All templates
Industry-Specific

Boredom Proneness Scale for Workplace Engagement

Measures how prone employees are to feeling bored or understimulated at work, using a trait-style statement battery, situational triggers, and coping responses. Built for HR, L&D, and people-analytics teams. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent boring moment to separate personality-driven boredom proneness from fixable role-design problems.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how boredom shows up in your work day. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right or wrong answers here — honest responses are what make this useful. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
MatrixRequired

How much do you agree or disagree with each statement about yourself?

7 rows × 5 columns
  • It's easy for me to stay focused on my work tasks.
  • I often find myself with time on my hands and nothing to do.
  • During the day, time seems to drag on and on.
  • I get bored more easily than most of my coworkers.
  • I need a lot of variety in my work to stay interested in it.
  • +2 more
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

Thinking about the last 30 days, how often did you feel bored or understimulated during your work day?

Scale: 010
Min:NeverMax:Nearly all day, every day
Q04
Multiple Choice

Which of the following most often leave you feeling bored at work? Select all that apply.

  • Routine or repetitive tasks
  • Meetings without a clear agenda
  • Waiting for input or approval from others
  • Training or onboarding sessions
  • Slow periods with light workload
  • Tasks that don't match my skills or interests
Q05
Ranking

When you feel bored at work, how do you typically respond? Rank these from your most common response (top) to your least common (bottom).

  1. Look for something else productive to do
  2. Let my mind wander
  3. Ask for additional or different work
  4. Scroll social media or browse online
  5. Chat with coworkers
  6. Push through and wait it out
Drag to rank
Q06
Slider Matrix

How boring do you find each of these, on a typical day?

5 rows, one slider each
  • Attending routine meetings
  • Doing repetitive administrative tasks
  • Waiting for approvals or handoffs
  • Completing required training
  • Working during slow or quiet periods
Slider 0–10Min:Not boring at allMax:Extremely boring
Q07
AI Interview

Ask the respondent to describe the most recent specific moment they felt bored at work: what task or situation triggered it, how long it lasted, and what they did in response. Anchor on whether the boredom came from too little stimulation (repetitive tasks, understaffed slow periods) or too much friction (unclear priorities, waiting on others). If their earlier answers suggested high boredom proneness overall, probe whether this feels like a lasting personal trait or a symptom of how their current role is designed.

Q08
Message

Just a few quick background questions — all optional — to help us see patterns across teams.

Q09
Multiple Choice

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
Multiple Choice

How long have you worked at your current organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • 5-10 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Multiple Choice

What best describes your current work arrangement?

  • Fully onsite
  • Hybrid
  • Fully remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Dropdown

Which department or team are you part of? (Template note: replace this list with your organization's actual department names before launching.)

  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Engineering/Production
  • Administration
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed into a report on where and why boredom shows up in day-to-day work, so we can redesign the parts that don't need to be dull.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes a dedicated agree/disagree statement battery for trait-level boredom proneness, not just a generic Likert template
  • Adds situational triggers (multiple-choice) and a ranked coping-response question so responses map to real workplace behavior, not just abstract agreement
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct a specific recent boring moment, separating personality-driven boredom proneness from fixable role-design issues — something no static form can do
  • Pairs a slider matrix on daily task boredom with optional demographic and tenure questions so HR/L&D teams can segment results by department, work arrangement, and time at company

QuestionPro

Boredom Proneness Scale Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a directly comparable, topic-matched template built around the classic Boredom Proneness Scale item set. It's presented as a static questionnaire with sample questions rather than an adaptive interview, so it works well for straightforward academic-style scoring but not for probing individual responses. Good reference for question wording, less useful for distinguishing trait boredom from workplace/role factors.

What it does well

  • Directly matches the boredom proneness topic with a recognizable scale-based question set
  • Likely includes sample questionnaire structure useful for quick deployment
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and reporting tools

Where it falls short

  • Static Likert-style form with no adaptive follow-up to explore why a respondent feels bored
  • No mechanism to separate stable trait boredom proneness from situational or role-design causes
  • No published methodology on how per-response scoring or interpretation is derived

SurveyMonkey

Likert Scale Survey Template

This is a generic Likert scale template, not a boredom-proneness-specific instrument — a team would need to substitute in all boredom-related statements themselves. It's a solid general-purpose scaffold for agree/disagree batteries but offers no boredom triggers, coping-response ranking, or workplace-engagement framing out of the box.

What it does well

  • Flexible, well-known template usable for any agree/disagree statement battery
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature distribution and basic reporting features
  • Easy starting point for teams already familiar with the platform

Where it falls short

  • No boredom-specific content — trigger questions, coping rankings, and situational context must be built from scratch
  • Purely static scale with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual boredom experiences
  • No built-in way to separate personality-driven boredom from fixable job-design issues

SurveySparrow

Free Likert Scale Questionnaire Template

Another generic, customizable Likert scale template rather than a purpose-built boredom proneness instrument — 'boredom' isn't the subject, agreement-scale methodology is. It's a reasonable base for building a trait statement battery but lacks any of the situational, coping, or interview-based components the topic calls for, and would need substantial customization for workplace boredom research.

What it does well

  • Customizable Likert framework adaptable to many survey topics
  • Conversational survey format may improve completion rates
  • Simple to adapt for HR teams already using SurveySparrow

Where it falls short

  • Not boredom-specific out of the box; all trait statements, triggers, and coping items must be authored manually
  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a real recent boring moment or probe root causes
  • No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation tied to boredom proneness specifically

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “Boredom Proneness Scale for Workplace Engagement” template?

The template includes 13 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how boredom shows up in your work day. Your responses are completely confi…” · “How much do you agree or disagree with each statement about yourself?” · “Thinking about the last 30 days, how often did you feel bored or understimulated during your work day?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 13 questions in about 7 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Industry-Specific

Colleague Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey

Measures how motivated, supported, and connected colleagues feel day to day, benchmarks a recommend-to-a-friend engagement score, and identifies which drivers (recognition, growth, workload, manager support) matter most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each person's score instead of settling for a number.

View template
Industry-Specific

Workplace Personality & Work Style Assessment

Assesses core work-style traits—organization, sociability, adaptability, decision-making, and stress response—through rating scales, a values ranking, and a trade-off allocation exercise. Built for hiring, team formation, or coaching contexts. An AI follow-up interview asks about one real recent situation to check whether stated preferences match actual behavior under pressure.

View template
Industry-Specific

Employee Attitude & Workplace Morale Survey

Tracks how employees genuinely feel about their work, managers, and leadership — using a validated advocacy score, a multi-statement morale battery, and a best-worst trade-off on what would move the needle. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each person's score instead of settling for the number alone. Built for HR and people teams running quarterly or annual pulse checks.

View template
Industry-Specific

Employee Engagement & Satisfaction Assessment

A structured engagement survey for HR teams to measure role satisfaction, workplace drivers, and improvement priorities across departments. Combines scaled measures with AI-moderated qualitative follow-up.

View template
Industry-Specific

The Proust Questionnaire: Team Personality Profile

A modernized version of the classic Proust Questionnaire — used by media teams, HR and culture leads, and creative agencies to build candid personality profiles for onboarding pages, podcast intros, or team retrospectives. Closed questions capture the classic prompts verbatim; the AI follow-up interview digs into whichever answer sounds most emotionally loaded to surface the real story behind it.

View template
Industry-Specific

Employee Job Stress and Burnout Diagnostic Survey

Measures how stressed employees feel at work, what's actually driving it, and how burnout shows up day to day — built for HR and people teams tracking well-being over time. The AI follow-up interview digs into a specific recent stressful moment behind each person's top stressor, surfacing detail closed questions can't capture.

View template