Q01
Message
All templatesEmployee & HR
Call Center Agent Performance Evaluation Survey
A supervisor-facing evaluation of a call center agent's call quality, adherence, and soft skills, paired with a best-worst training-priority ranking and an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific recent call to explain the reasoning behind the ratings. Built for team leads and quality analysts running periodic performance reviews.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
13 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Short TextRequired
Which agent are you evaluating? (Name or employee ID)
Q03
Short TextRequired
What period does this evaluation cover? (e.g., 'Q3 2024' or 'last 30 days')
Q04
MatrixRequired
Based on calls you've monitored or reviewed this period, rate this agent on each dimension.
6 rows × 3 columns
- Professionalism and tone
- Active listening
- Accuracy of information provided
- Issue resolution effectiveness
- Adherence to scripts and processes
- +1 more
Columns: Needs improvement · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how would you rate this agent's call handling quality this period?
Scale: 1 – 10
Min:PoorMax:Excellent
Q06
Multiple ChoiceRequired
In the last 30 days, how often did this agent adhere to their scheduled shift and break times?
- Always
- Most of the time
- Sometimes
- Rarely
- Never
Q07
Rating Scale
How would you rate this agent's teamwork and collaboration with peers and other departments?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:PoorMax:Excellent
Q08
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
Which training areas are most and least urgent for this agent right now?
- Product knowledge
- De-escalation and conflict handling
- Systems and software proficiency
- Compliance and script adherence
- Time management and call efficiency
- Communication clarity
- Upselling or cross-selling technique
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most urgent training needWorst:Least urgent training need
Q09
AI Interview
Ask the supervisor to walk through one specific recent call from this agent that stands out, good or bad, and reconstruct exactly what happened: what the customer needed, how the agent handled it, and what the outcome was. Probe for concrete behavioral detail behind the lowest-rated dimension in the earlier ratings rather than general impressions. If the supervisor gives conflicting signals (e.g., high overall quality but low adherence), ask them to reconcile the two directly.
Q10
Long Text
Any other specific examples worth noting — an exceptional save, a difficult call, or a recurring issue?
Q11
Multiple Choice
What is your role relative to this agent?
- Team lead
- Quality analyst
- Operations manager
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Dropdown
How long have you been directly supervising or reviewing this agent?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-2 years
- Over 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Message
Thank you for completing this evaluation. Your ratings and comments will feed directly into this agent's coaching plan and the next training cycle.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a supervisor-facing matrix and rating scales covering call quality, adherence, and teamwork alongside a best-worst max-diff ranking to pinpoint the single most urgent training priority
- Pairs static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that has the supervisor reconstruct one specific recent call, surfacing the reasoning and context behind the scores rather than just the numbers
- Captures rater context (role relative to agent, tenure supervising) so results can be segmented and trusted, plus an open-ended field for exceptional saves or difficult calls
- Feeds directly into an auto-generated report, with transparent prompts showing exactly how the AI follow-up was conducted for this evaluation cycle
Jotform
Call Center Employee Evaluation Form TemplateA fielding-ready, customizable form builder template covering standard call center evaluation criteria like communication and professionalism. It's built for quick deployment and integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a static rating form rather than an interview-driven evaluation.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use drag-and-drop template with broad form-building customization
- Part of a mature form platform with wide integration options
- Likely supports conditional logic for basic branching
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe the reasoning behind ratings
- No mechanism to reconstruct or discuss a specific recent call in the supervisor's own words
- No published prompt-level methodology or transparency into how responses are scored
SurveySparrow
Call Center Employee Evaluation TemplateA conversational-style survey template aimed at call center employee evaluations, leveraging SurveySparrow's chat-like UI for a more engaging respondent experience. It covers standard evaluation dimensions but remains a fixed-question format without follow-up probing.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that may improve completion rates
- Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup
- Likely includes basic scoring/reporting dashboards
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into specifics of a particular call
- No best-worst/max-diff style prioritization for training needs
- No transparent, published prompt methodology for how follow-up or scoring works
Typeform
Call Center Employee Evaluation Form TemplateA polished, fielding-ready form built on Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time interface, suited for call center performance reviews. It emphasizes design and respondent experience but relies on fixed questions rather than dynamic follow-up.
What it does well
- Clean, high-completion-rate one-question-at-a-time interface
- Fielding-ready with minimal setup required
- Established platform with logic jumps for basic branching
Where it falls short
- No AI-driven follow-up interview to reconstruct specific call scenarios
- No automated per-response quality scoring tied to a defined rubric
- No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative context
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Call Center Agent Performance Evaluation Survey” template?
The template includes 13 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to evaluate this agent's recent performance. Your honest, specific feedback helps shape…” · “Which agent are you evaluating? (Name or employee ID)” · “What period does this evaluation cover? (e.g., 'Q3 2024' or 'last 30 days')”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 13 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Employee & HR
New Hire SaaS Tool Onboarding Experience Survey
Captures how effectively new employees are onboarded onto your company's core software tools in their first weeks — covering training quality, self-sufficiency, and time-to-productivity — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment onboarding broke down. Built for HR and IT/People Ops teams refining new-hire tech ramp-up.
View templateEmployee & HR
Employee Attitude & Engagement Pulse Survey
Measures how employees feel about their role, manager, and the organization overall — covering recognition, motivation, and intent to stay — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind low or high scores instead of settling for a number. Built for HR teams running regular engagement pulses.
View templateEmployee & HR
Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection
A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, combining competency self-ratings, goal progress, and development priorities with an AI follow-up that draws out the specific evidence behind an employee's accomplishments and challenges. Built for HR teams and managers running annual or quarterly review processes.
View templateEmployee & HR
Workplace Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Climate Survey
Measures how included, respected, and fairly treated employees feel day-to-day — covering belonging, fairness in advancement, exposure to exclusionary behavior, and which DEI investments matter most. An AI follow-up interview turns the lowest-scoring signals into concrete, specific stories HR can act on. For HR and DEI teams running an annual or pulse climate check, about 8 minutes.
View templateEmployee & HR
Employee Write-Up Experience & Fairness Check
Captures how an employee experienced a formal write-up or written warning — clarity of the issue, perceived fairness, and what support would help them improve. Built for HR teams and people managers auditing disciplinary conversations, with an AI follow-up interview that surfaces exactly what the employee understood, agreed with, or found unclear.
View templateEmployee & HR
Manager Effectiveness & Upward Feedback Survey
Captures how direct reports experience their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and support — with a rating battery, a prioritization exercise on where to improve, and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their satisfaction score. Built for HR teams and leaders running 360 or upward-feedback cycles.
View template