Q01
Message
All templatesIndustry-Specific
Classroom Observation and Coaching Feedback Survey
A structured post-lesson observation form for instructional coaches, administrators, and peer observers to rate teaching practices, student engagement, and instructional strategy — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moments behind the ratings so feedback is concrete enough to coach from.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
13 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Short TextRequired
What grade level and subject was observed (e.g., '7th grade math')?
Q03
MatrixRequired
Rate what you observed for each of the following teaching practices during this lesson.
5 rows × 4 columns
- Classroom management and routines
- Lesson pacing
- Checking for student understanding
- Student engagement strategies
- Differentiation for diverse learners
Columns: Not observed · Needs improvement · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how effectively did this lesson meet its stated learning objective?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Objective was not metMax:Objective was fully met
Q05
Rating ScaleRequired
How would you rate student engagement during the lesson overall?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Mostly disengagedMax:Highly engaged
Q06
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Which instructional format dominated the majority of the lesson?
- Whole-class lecture/direct instruction
- Small group or partner work
- Class discussion or Socratic seminar
- Independent seatwork
- Technology-based or self-paced activity
Q07
RankingRequired
Rank these areas from most to least in need of coaching focus for this teacher, based on what you observed.
- Questioning techniques
- Time management and pacing
- Differentiation
- Behavior/classroom management
- Use of formative assessment
- Student voice and participation
Drag to rank
Q08
AI Interview
Reconstruct the moment that most drove the overall effectiveness rating: ask the observer to describe what specifically happened, what the teacher and students were doing, and why it stood out. Also probe for the single most engaging moment and the single least engaging moment of the lesson with concrete detail. If the observer flagged a low-scoring practice in the ratings, ask what coaching support or resource would most directly address it.
Q09
Long TextRequired
Describe one specific strength you observed, with a concrete example (what the teacher said or did, and how students responded).
Q10
Long TextRequired
Describe one growth area you observed and one specific, actionable next step the teacher could try.
Q11
Multiple Choice
What is your role relative to this classroom?
- Peer teacher
- Instructional coach
- School administrator
- Department head
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice
How many years have you worked in education?
- Less than 2 years
- 2-5 years
- 6-10 years
- 11-20 years
- More than 20 years
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Message
Thank you for this observation! Your ratings and notes will be compiled into a feedback summary shared with the teacher to support their next coaching conversation.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a matrix rating of specific teaching practices plus an overall opinion-scale effectiveness rating and a student engagement rating, giving both granular and summary scores in one form
- Pairs a ranking question (coaching-focus priority areas) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual classroom moment behind the overall rating, turning a static score into a specific, coachable example
- Two structured long-text prompts require observers to name a concrete strength with an example and a growth area with an actionable next step, so feedback isn't vague
- Captures observer context (role, years in education) and lesson context (grade/subject, instructional format) so ratings can be filtered and compared across observers and classrooms
Jotform
Tier 1 Classroom Observation Form TemplateA fielding-ready static form for structured classroom observation, likely built around a specific tiered observation rubric. It covers standard rating fields but has no mechanism to probe further into why a rating was given. Best suited for compliance-style documentation rather than deep coaching conversations.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use template aligned to a named observation tier/rubric
- Jotform's drag-and-drop builder allows easy customization of fields
- Supports standard form logic and file/photo attachments common to Jotform forms
Where it falls short
- Static rating fields only — no adaptive follow-up to reconstruct the specific moment behind a score
- No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated coaching report
SurveySparrow
Classroom Observation Form Template | For Elementary LevelsA conversational-style survey template scoped specifically to elementary classrooms, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel less clinical. It's a ready-to-field template but appears narrowly targeted to elementary levels rather than general K-12 or subject-specific coaching. No indication it supports follow-up probing beyond preset questions.
What it does well
- Conversational UI can make observation forms feel quicker to fill out
- Template is explicitly tailored to elementary classroom contexts
- Likely supports SurveySparrow's standard reporting/dashboard views
Where it falls short
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific rating
- No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
- No transparent, published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Industry-Specific
Food Allergy Customer Trust & Safety Survey
Captures how confidently people managing food allergies navigate menus, ingredient labels, and staff interactions at restaurants and food brands — and where that trust breaks down. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs their most recent close call or unclear-labeling experience in detail. Built for restaurants, food manufacturers, and allergy-focused brands.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Personal Self-Reflection & Growth Check-In
A periodic check-in that measures how often people reflect, how self-aware they feel, and what's actually blocking deeper reflection — paired with an AI follow-up that walks through one real moment of insight instead of vague self-ratings. Built for coaches, HR wellbeing programs, and personal-development tools tracking growth over time.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Mid-Year Performance Review Pulse Survey
Captures how employees see their progress at the midpoint of the year — goal status, manager support, obstacles, and priorities for the second half — so managers and HR can course-correct before year-end reviews lock in. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind each person's progress rating and top obstacle instead of just the label they picked.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Client Project Satisfaction & Delivery Review
Measures how satisfied clients or stakeholders are with a completed or in-flight project — covering scope clarity, timeliness, budget adherence, communication, and deliverable quality — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind the overall rating instead of a generic star score. Built for agencies, consultancies, and internal project teams running post-project or milestone reviews.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Apple vs Samsung Brand Preference & Switching Survey
Compares how current Apple and Samsung owners rate each brand on camera, battery, software, design, and value, then uses a best-worst trade-off and point allocation to surface what actually drives purchase decisions. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real trigger behind brand loyalty or a planned switch. Built for mobile brand and product teams.
View templateIndustry-Specific
LGBTQ+ Representation in Media Consumption Survey
Measures how LGBTQ+ audiences and allies encounter and judge queer representation in film, TV, and streaming — how often they see it, where, and whether it feels authentic — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into one specific portrayal that shaped their view. Built for media researchers, studios, and advocacy orgs.
View template