All templates
Healthcare & Clinical

Clinical Trial Site Workload & Data Capture Assessment

Measures documentation burden, system usability, and data capture pain points among clinical trial site staff. Designed for site coordinators, investigators, and research personnel to identify operational bottlenecks and prioritize workflow improvements.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

29 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Clinical Trial Site Workload & Data Capture Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with clinical documentation and trial data capture over the past 30 days. Your responses will help identify opportunities to reduce site burden and improve data capture workflows. • Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we want your honest perspective. • All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. • Estimated completion time: 8–10 minutes. Please proceed to begin.

Q02
Multiple Choice

In the past 12 months, have you worked on clinical trials at your site?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
Dropdown

Outside of clinical trials, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on clinical documentation and data entry in the past 30 days?

  • Less than 2 hours
  • 2–5 hours
  • 6–10 hours
  • 11–20 hours
  • 21–30 hours
  • More than 30 hours
Q04
Dropdown

On average, how many hours per week did you spend on trial documentation and data entry in the past 30 days?

  • Less than 2 hours
  • 2–5 hours
  • 6–10 hours
  • 11–20 hours
  • 21–30 hours
  • More than 30 hours
Q05
Multiple Choice

Which tools did you use for trial data capture in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • Sponsor-specific EDC
  • eSource platform
  • EHR-to-EDC integration
  • Paper source
  • Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel)
  • Other (please specify)
Q06
Ranking

Please rank your top 3 biggest trial data capture pain points (1 = biggest).

  1. Protocol complexity impacting data entry
  2. Duplicate entry between source and EDC
  3. System performance/downtime
  4. High query volume
  5. Training/retraining requirements
  6. Scheduling/coordination conflicts
Drag to rank
Q07
Opinion Scale

How confident are you that your site can meet sponsor data timelines over the next 3 months?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Very confident
Q08
Multiple Choice

What type of site do you primarily work at?

  • Academic medical center
  • Community hospital
  • Private practice
  • Independent research site/SMO
  • FQHC/Public clinic
  • Other (please specify)
Q09
Message

Thank you for your time. Your input will directly inform efforts to reduce site burden and improve data capture workflows. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.

Q10
Multiple Choice

What is your primary role in clinical trials at your site?

  • Principal Investigator (PI)
  • Sub-Investigator
  • Study Coordinator/CRC
  • Research Nurse
  • Data Manager
  • Pharmacist
  • Other (please specify)
Q11
Opinion Scale

Overall, how burdensome was non-trial clinical documentation in the past 30 days?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all burdensomeMax:Extremely burdensome
Q12
Opinion Scale

Overall, how burdensome was trial data capture at your site in the past 30 days?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all burdensomeMax:Extremely burdensome
Q13
Dropdown

Which was your primary system for entering trial data in the past 30 days?

  • Sponsor-specific EDC
  • eSource platform
  • EHR-to-EDC integration
  • Paper source
  • Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel)
  • Other
Q14
Ranking

Which of the following trial activities took the most of your time in the past 30 days? Please rank your top 3 (1 = most time).

  1. Source documentation
  2. EDC data entry
  3. Query management/resolution
  4. Visit scheduling/coordination
  5. Regulatory/IRB documentation
  6. Training/meetings
Drag to rank
Q15
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about site documentation or data capture.

Q16
Dropdown

How many years have you worked in clinical research (any role)?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–6 years
  • 7–10 years
  • 11–15 years
  • More than 15 years
Q17
Dropdown

How many interventional trials did you actively support in the past 30 days?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • More than 10
Q18
Multiple Choice

Which systems took most of your non-trial documentation time in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • EHR
  • Quality registry portals
  • Prior authorization portals
  • Spreadsheets
  • Paper forms
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
Opinion Scale

Thinking about your primary trial data entry system, how easy or difficult was it to navigate between forms and pages?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q20
Long Text

What one change would most reduce trial data capture burden at your site?

Q21
AI Interview

We'd like to understand your experience with trial documentation and data capture in more depth. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q22
Multiple Choice

What patient population do you primarily serve?

  • Adults
  • Pediatrics
  • Both
Q23
Long Text

What was the single biggest barrier to efficient non-trial documentation in the past 30 days?

Q24
Opinion Scale

How easy or difficult was it to enter and save patient data in your primary system?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q25
Multiple Choice

Which trial phases do you typically support? Select all that apply.

  • Phase I
  • Phase II
  • Phase III
  • Phase IV/Post-market
  • Medical device studies
  • Other (please specify)
Q26
Opinion Scale

How easy or difficult was it to manage and resolve queries in your primary system?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q27
Dropdown

In which region do you primarily work?

  • North America
  • Western Europe
  • Eastern Europe
  • Latin America
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Other
Q28
Opinion Scale

How easy or difficult was it to generate reports or export data from your primary system?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q29
Opinion Scale

Overall, how satisfied are you with your primary system for trial data entry?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all satisfiedMax:Extremely satisfied

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview block that lets site staff elaborate in their own words on documentation and data-capture pain points, going beyond fixed-choice questions
  • Combines burden ratings (opinion scales), tool/system usage questions, and ranking questions to pinpoint which specific systems and activities create the most workload
  • Captures role, trial phase, region, and experience context so results can be segmented by coordinator vs. investigator vs. site type
  • Asks directly about confidence in meeting sponsor data timelines, giving a forward-looking operational risk signal that a generic form does not capture

Typeform

Data Capture Form Template

This is a generic data capture form template, not a clinical trial or research-specific survey, and it appears to be a static form rather than a fielding-ready assessment with branching or scoring logic. It could be manually adapted for research use but includes none of the clinical-trial-specific content (system usability, query resolution, timeline confidence) found in QuestionPunk's template.

What it does well

  • Clean, simple UI for basic data collection
  • Easy to customize field types for general-purpose intake
  • Part of a well-known no-code form builder ecosystem

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe open-ended pain points
  • Not tailored to clinical trial workflows, roles, or terminology
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated operational report generation

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Healthcare & Clinical

Post-Visit Patient Support & Education Experience Survey

Measures patient perceptions of post-visit support access, health education clarity, and care coordination quality. Designed for healthcare organizations seeking to identify gaps in patient communication and follow-up processes.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Patient-Provider Fit & Care Preference Assessment

Measures patient-provider alignment across clinical, communication, and access dimensions to identify mismatch drivers and care preferences. Designed for healthcare organizations, insurers, or researchers seeking to improve provider matching and patient retention.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment

Evaluates laboratory information system usability, data accuracy, and workflow efficiency for biotech and healthcare lab professionals based on recent 30–90 day experience.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Patient Scheduling & Reminder Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates patient satisfaction with healthcare appointment booking, confirmation, and reminder processes to identify friction points, optimize communication timing, and reduce no-show rates.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Group Therapy Informed Consent & Readiness Check

Confirms that a new group therapy member understands confidentiality limits, voluntary participation, and what to expect, while gauging comfort with sharing in front of others. An AI follow-up interview surfaces the specific worries behind low comfort or confusion so facilitators can address them before the first session. Built for therapists and group practices running intake.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Hospital Discharge Experience & Readiness Survey

Assesses whether patients left the hospital genuinely prepared to manage recovery at home — covering instruction clarity, medication confidence, and follow-up care arrangements. An AI follow-up interview digs into what actually happened after discharge, especially for patients who needed unplanned care, to surface where the handoff broke down.

View template