All templates
Industry-Specific

Website Building Process & Workflow Survey

Captures how people and teams actually spend their time building or redesigning websites — which tools they rely on, where friction piles up, and how satisfied they are at each stage. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest bottleneck respondents hit, reconstructing what happened and what workaround (if any) they used.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for sharing your experience building websites! This helps us understand where time and frustration go in a typical build. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes, and there are no wrong answers.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Which best describes your role on your most recent website build?

  • Freelance web builder/developer
  • In-house marketing or IT team
  • Agency team member
  • Business owner building it myself
  • Other
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired

In the last 6 months, what type(s) of website have you built or significantly redesigned?

  • Business/marketing site
  • E-commerce store
  • Blog or content site
  • Portfolio
  • Web application
  • Landing page(s) only
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Which platform or tool did you primarily use for that build?

  • WordPress
  • Squarespace
  • Wix
  • Webflow
  • Shopify
  • Custom code (no CMS)
  • Other
Q05
Point AllocationRequired

Thinking about your most recent website build, allocate 100 points across these activities based on how much time each one actually took.

  • Planning & wireframing
  • Design & layout
  • Development/coding
  • Content writing & population
  • SEO setup
  • Testing & QA
  • Launch & deployment
Allocate 100 points
Q06
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Which of these parts of building a website cause you the most friction, and which cause the least?

  • Mobile responsiveness
  • Cross-browser/device testing
  • Content migration
  • SEO optimization
  • Client or stakeholder feedback rounds
  • Hosting & deployment setup
  • Page speed/performance optimization
  • Accessibility compliance
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most frustratingWorst:Least frustrating
Q07
MatrixRequired

How satisfied were you with each stage of your most recent build?

6 rows × 5 columns
  • Planning & wireframing
  • Design
  • Development
  • Content creation
  • Testing
  • +1 more
Columns: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend the platform/tool you used to a peer building a similar website?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q09
Rating Scale

How would you rate the overall speed of your last website-build process from start to launch?

Range: 15
Min:Very slowMax:Very fast
Q10
AI Interview

Identify the single biggest bottleneck or source of friction in the respondent's most recent website build — anchor on their max-diff and time-allocation answers if available. Reconstruct exactly what happened at that stage, what caused the delay or frustration, and what workaround or tool (if any) they used to get past it. If they describe a smooth build with no real friction, probe what specifically made it go well so it can be replicated.

Q11
Number

In the last 6 months, how many websites have you built or significantly redesigned?

Q12
Multiple Choice

How many people are typically involved in your website builds?

  • Just me
  • 2-3 people
  • 4-10 people
  • More than 10 people
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed into a report on where website-building time and effort really go, so tools and processes can better match how people actually work.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that digs into the single biggest bottleneck each respondent hit, reconstructing what happened and what workaround they used — something no static form can do
  • Combines quantitative measures (constant-sum tool-time allocation, MaxDiff friction ranking, satisfaction matrix, speed rating, recommend-likelihood scale) with qualitative depth in one flow
  • Captures both individual and team context (role, team size, tools/platforms used, number of builds in 6 months) for segmenting results by workflow type
  • Auto-generates a report on where website-build friction concentrates, drawing on both the structured ratings and the AI-probed bottleneck stories

QuestionPro

Digital Marketing Activities Survey Template

This is a static, fixed-question template centered on digital marketing activities more broadly, with website-building as one of several possible activity areas rather than the sole focus. It's fielding-ready out of the box, but it doesn't drill into build workflow specifics like tool allocation, per-stage satisfaction, or bottleneck root-causing the way a dedicated website-build survey would. No adaptive follow-up exists to explore any one respondent's experience in more depth.

What it does well

  • Ready-to-deploy template requiring no build time
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad template library and distribution tools
  • Likely covers general marketing-activity benchmarking, not just web builds

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interview to follow up on an individual's specific bottleneck or workaround
  • No voice-based interview option for richer qualitative capture
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Industry-Specific

Graduation Exit Survey for Outgoing Students

Captures how graduating students rate their academic program, career preparation, and overall value as they leave — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moments behind their satisfaction score. Built for registrars, program directors, and student success teams who need both a benchmark number and the story behind it.

View template
Industry-Specific

Supplier Service Performance Evaluation Survey

Gathers structured performance ratings and behavioral feedback on a supplier's delivery, quality, and responsiveness, for procurement and vendor management teams conducting periodic reviews. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the lowest-rated area so scorecards reflect what actually happened, not just a number.

View template
Industry-Specific

Primary Trauma Exposure & Workplace Support Survey

For organizations in high-risk professions (first responders, healthcare, social services, journalism) to understand how often staff are directly exposed to traumatic events on the job and whether current support systems actually help. An AI follow-up interview explores what support was present or missing after a recent difficult incident, without asking anyone to relive graphic details.

View template
Industry-Specific

Forced-Choice Agreement Survey (No Neutral Option)

Measures agreement with a set of statements using an even-numbered rating scale that removes the neutral midpoint, forcing respondents to lean agree or disagree rather than sit on the fence. Built for HR, product, and policy teams who want to reduce central-tendency bias in attitude research. The AI follow-up digs into the concrete reason behind each respondent's strongest lean and what would change their mind.

View template
Industry-Specific

Patient Visit Experience Survey (CAHPS-Aligned)

Measures how a patient experienced a specific provider visit — getting the appointment, provider communication, staff courtesy, and an overall rating — modeled on the CAHPS Clinician & Group Visit 2.0 survey used across medical practices and health systems. An AI follow-up interview digs into the exact moment or interaction that drove the patient's overall rating, turning a single number into an actionable story.

View template
Industry-Specific

Gym Habits and Fitness Goals of GLP-1 Medication Users

Explores how people taking GLP-1 medications (semaglutide, tirzepatide, and similar) approach exercise — workout frequency, strength training, muscle-preservation concerns, and goal prioritization — with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their top fitness goal or biggest barrier. Built for gyms, fitness apps, and health researchers studying this fast-growing population.

View template