All templates
Privacy & Compliance

Contract Workflow Efficiency & Visibility Assessment

Assesses internal stakeholders' experience with contract workflow visibility, SLA adherence, and cycle times to identify process bottlenecks and prioritize improvements.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

21 questions · ~10 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Contract Workflow Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with contract workflows over the past 6 months—specifically visibility, timelines, and process efficiency. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to inform process improvements. Participation is voluntary, and you may exit at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we want your honest perspective. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your involvement with contract workflows?

  • I negotiate contracts directly
  • I review, approve, or request contracts
  • I am not involved in contract workflows
Q03
Opinion Scale

How clear is the end-to-end contract workflow in your organization today?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all clearMax:Extremely clear
Q04
Dropdown

Approximately how many calendar days does a typical standard contract take from intake to signature?

  • 1–5 days
  • 6–10 days
  • 11–20 days
  • 21–30 days
  • 31–45 days
  • 46–60 days
  • More than 60 days
  • Not sure
Q05
Multiple Choice

In the past 6 months, at which workflow stages did you most frequently encounter delays? (Select all that apply.)

  • Intake / request submission
  • Initial review and triage
  • Drafting
  • Internal review and approval
  • Negotiation / redlining
  • Final approval
  • Execution / signature
  • None — I did not experience significant delays
Q06
Ranking

Rank the following improvements by their potential to increase contract workflow transparency or speed. (Place the most impactful at the top.)

  1. Greater status visibility / dashboard
  2. Clearer and enforced SLAs
  3. Higher-quality intake (forms, required fields)
  4. Template and playbook standardization
  5. Automated reminders and escalations
  6. Additional resourcing or coverage
  7. Self-service for low-risk agreements
Drag to rank
Q07
AI Interview

Thank you for your answers so far. I'd like to explore your contract workflow experiences in a bit more depth. Could you walk me through a recent situation where the contract process worked well or where it broke down?

Q08
Multiple Choice

Which function best describes your role?

  • Sales
  • Legal
  • Procurement
  • Finance
  • Operations
  • IT
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
Message

Thank you for your time. Your input will directly inform improvements to contract workflows and processes.

Q10
Opinion Scale

Thinking about your contract requests in the past 6 months, how easy was it to see status updates?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q11
Multiple Choice

Does your team use documented SLAs for contract turnaround times?

  • Yes, for all standard requests
  • Yes, for some request types
  • No
  • Not sure
Q12
Multiple Choice

What are the most common causes of contract delays you experienced in the past 6 months? (Select all that apply.)

  • Unclear or incomplete intake requirements
  • High volume of redlines
  • Waiting on internal approvers
  • Template or clause mismatches
  • Team capacity constraints
  • Tooling or system limitations
  • External counterparty delays
  • Competing priorities
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
Long Text

What is the single most impactful change that could be made to contract workflows this quarter?

Q14
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, is there any additional context about contract workflow transparency or timelines you'd like to share?

Q15
Multiple Choice

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director
  • VP+
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
Opinion Scale

Thinking of your most recent contract request, how well were timeline expectations set at kickoff?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q17
Opinion Scale

When SLAs exist, how often were they met over the past 6 months?

Scale: 17
Min:Rarely metMax:Almost always met
Q18
Dropdown

How long have you worked at your organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
Multiple Choice

How do you currently track the status of your contract requests?

  • A system dashboard (e.g., CLM tool)
  • A shared tracker (e.g., spreadsheet)
  • Ad hoc updates (e.g., email, Slack)
  • I don't have a way to track status
  • Other (please specify)
Q20
Multiple Choice

Where do you primarily work?

  • On-site
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
Multiple Choice

Which region do you primarily support?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Multiple regions
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Pairs quantitative opinion-scale questions (workflow clarity, ease of initiating requests, SLA adherence) with a ranking exercise and open-text prompts to both measure and explain bottlenecks.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview segment that adaptively probes deeper into a respondent's specific contract workflow experience after the structured questions.
  • Captures function, role level, tenure, work location, and region so results can be segmented by stakeholder type rather than treated as one aggregate score.
  • Uses targeted multiple-choice questions on workflow stage and delay causes to help pinpoint where in the process bottlenecks actually occur, not just that they exist.

SurveySparrow

Internal Audit Risk Assessment Questionnaire

This is a fielding-ready internal assessment questionnaire aimed at the same type of internal-stakeholder audience, but its content is built around audit and risk controls rather than contract workflow, SLA adherence, or cycle-time visibility. It's the closest structural analog among available competitors (an internal process-assessment survey) rather than a topic match.

What it does well

  • Purpose-built internal assessment questionnaire format aimed at employee/stakeholder respondents
  • SurveySparrow's conversational survey UI is known to support multi-channel distribution
  • Ready to deploy as-is for a related internal-assessment use case

Where it falls short

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual risk or process answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
  • Content is oriented to audit/risk controls, not contract-specific workflow stages, SLAs, or cycle times

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “Contract Workflow Efficiency & Visibility Assessment” template?

The template includes 21 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the Contract Workflow Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with contract workflows over the pa…” · “Which best describes your involvement with contract workflows?” · “How clear is the end-to-end contract workflow in your organization today?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 21 questions in about 10 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Privacy & Compliance

Consent & Preference Center UX Evaluation

Evaluates how users discover, understand, and interact with cookie consent and preference-center interfaces. Use this survey to identify UX friction points, trust gaps, and feature priorities that affect compliance and conversion.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Internal Tools & Workflow Usability Assessment

Measures employee-perceived usability, reliability, and efficiency of internal tools and workflows. Use with cross-functional teams to identify friction points and prioritize improvements.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

SaaS Procurement Workflow Audit Survey

Evaluates the efficiency and pain points across SaaS request, approval, and renewal workflows. Designed for IT, procurement, finance, and operational stakeholders to identify bottlenecks and prioritize process improvements.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Internal Process Time-Waste & Automation Opportunity Survey

Pinpoints which internal processes waste the most employee time, how often people route around official steps with workarounds, and which tasks are the best candidates for automation. Built for ops, IT, or PMO teams doing a process-improvement audit; the AI follow-up reconstructs the actual workaround steps behind the numbers so you know exactly what to fix first.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Vendor Onboarding Efficiency & Compliance Assessment

Assesses internal stakeholders' experiences with vendor onboarding speed, process friction, and compliance steps over the past 6 months to identify bottlenecks and prioritize process improvements.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Statement of Work Clarity & Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates how clearly a Statement of Work defined scope, deliverables, timelines, pricing, and change control for a specific client-vendor engagement, and how well execution matched what was written. Built for procurement, PMO, and agency teams reviewing SOW quality after project close, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment scope ambiguity or a change order caused friction.

View template