Crypto Wallet Setup & Recovery UX Study
Evaluates user comprehension, confidence, and preferences around non-custodial wallet setup flows, seed phrase recovery, and network fee transparency to identify UX friction points and reduce drop-off.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Have you ever set up a crypto wallet (e.g., MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Ledger)?
- Yes, I have set up a wallet
- No, this would be my first time
- Not sure / Can't remember
To what extent do you agree or disagree: "If I lose my seed phrase and have no other backup, no one—including the wallet company—can recover my funds."
Which recovery approaches have you heard of for non-custodial wallets? Select all that apply.
- Seed phrase (12/24 words) written or stored securely
- Encrypted cloud backup (protected by a password or passkey)
- Hardware device backup (e.g., hardware wallet)
- Social recovery with trusted contacts
- Email/SMS one-time codes
- Device-based recovery (MPC, no seed phrase)
- Custodial recovery by verifying identity with a company
- None of the above
Which best describes your current understanding of network fees (sometimes called 'gas fees') during wallet setup or first use?
- I know when fees occur and who receives them
- I somewhat understand fees but not all the details
- I thought fees were charged by the wallet company
- I did not notice any fees during setup
- I'm unsure
Which setup flow length would you prefer for a new wallet?
- One quick step now; guide me later as needed
- A guided flow of 3–5 concise steps
- A detailed flow of 6–8 steps with explanations
- Not sure
If a wallet app used the setup flow you described as preferred, how likely would you be to complete the entire setup process?
We'd like to explore your wallet setup and recovery experiences in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
Thank you for your time! Your feedback will help improve wallet setup, recovery, and fee transparency for all users.
For this survey, imagine you are setting up a new non-custodial (self-custody) crypto wallet today. If you've done this in the last 12 months, please answer based on your most recent setup experience. Otherwise, answer based on what you would expect from a clear setup flow.
How familiar are you with cryptocurrencies and Web3 concepts?
To what extent do you agree or disagree: "My private keys are stored by the wallet app company and they can reset them for me if needed."
If you had to choose one primary recovery method for a new non-custodial wallet, which would you prefer?
- Seed phrase backup (12/24 words)
- Encrypted cloud backup with password/passkey
- Social recovery with trusted contacts
- Device-based recovery (MPC, no seed phrase)
- Custodial recovery by verifying identity
- I'm not sure yet
Which parts of the wallet setup process feel most confusing or risky to you? Select all that apply.
- Choosing a recovery method
- Writing / storing a seed phrase
- Backing up to cloud storage
- Understanding what is actually backed up
- Estimating or approving network fees
- Linking or restoring on a second device
- App permissions or privacy notices
- Nothing felt confusing or risky
How would you rate your overall confidence in managing a non-custodial wallet on your own?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions for making wallet setup and recovery clearer.
What is your gender?
- Female
- Male
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
To what extent do you agree or disagree: "I understand the difference between a custodial wallet (e.g., Coinbase account) and a non-custodial wallet (e.g., MetaMask)."
How confident are you that you could recover access to your wallet if you lost your phone?
In which country or region do you currently reside?
- United States
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- European Union
- Australia
- India
- Singapore
- Latin America
- Africa
- Other
Please rank the following factors by how important they are to you when choosing a wallet recovery method, from most important to least important.
- Security / robustness
- Ease of use
- Privacy of my data
- Cost / fees
- Speed to recover
- Works across my devices
- No single point of failure (resilience)
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- High school or less
- Some college / Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate / Professional degree
- Other
In your own words, what is a seed phrase and when would you use it?
Which of the following best describes your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Combines structured opinion-scale and multiple-choice questions on seed phrase understanding, private key custody, and network fee comprehension with an adaptive AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper into individual answers in real time
- Includes an open-text question asking respondents to explain a seed phrase in their own words, giving richer qualitative signal on comprehension gaps than closed-ended forms alone
- Captures preference data via ranking and multiple-choice questions on setup flow length and recovery method, plus a dedicated question on which parts of setup feel most confusing or risky
- Pairs quantitative confidence/familiarity scales with a final open-text reflection and demographic questions, then rolls everything into an automated report with transparent, reviewable AI prompts
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Crypto Wallet Setup & Recovery UX Study” template?
The template includes 25 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thank you for participating in this study about crypto wallet setup experiences. Your responses are voluntary and confi…” · “Have you ever set up a crypto wallet (e.g., MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Ledger)?” · “To what extent do you agree or disagree: "If I lose my seed phrase and have no other backup, no one—including the wallet…”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 25 questions in about 11 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Credit Card Dispute Resolution Experience Survey
Measures cardholder satisfaction, effort, and friction across the end-to-end dispute lifecycle—from initiation through resolution—to identify process improvements and support retention.
View templateCrypto Wallet Setup, Recovery & Transaction UX Survey
Evaluates self-custody wallet onboarding friction, seed phrase recovery confidence, and on-chain transaction clarity to identify UX improvements. Designed for crypto wallet product teams targeting active wallet users.
View templateWeb3 Onboarding Knowledge & Confidence Assessment
Measures new and early-stage crypto users' comprehension of gas fees, blockchain networks, and wallet/dApp permissions to identify knowledge gaps and UX friction points in Web3 onboarding flows.
View templateError Message Clarity & Recovery UX Survey
Evaluates software error message clarity, perceived responsibility, user confidence, and recovery experience to optimize UX copy, reduce support volume, and improve trust.
View templateEcommerce Checkout & Payment UX Friction Survey
Diagnose friction points across the ecommerce checkout and payment flow—from cart to confirmation—to identify drivers of cart abandonment and prioritize UX improvements that boost conversion rates.
View templateCheckout Fraud-Prevention vs. Conversion UX Survey
Measures how ecommerce customers perceive and respond to fraud-prevention steps during checkout, identifying the trade-offs between security friction and conversion to guide UX optimization.
View template