Q01
Message
All templatesDeveloper & Engineering
Developer Toolchain & Setup Experience Survey
Measures project setup friction, tooling usability, and productivity flow for software developers. Use to identify onboarding bottlenecks, prioritize tool investments, and benchmark developer experience.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
29 questions · ~12 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
Which code editor or IDE do you primarily use?
- VS Code
- JetBrains IDE (e.g., IntelliJ, PyCharm)
- Visual Studio
- Vim/Neovim
- Emacs
- Xcode
- Eclipse
- Other
Q03
Multiple Choice
In the past 3 months, approximately how many new projects have you set up from scratch?
- None
- 1
- 2 to 3
- 4 or more
Q04
Opinion Scale
Overall, how would you rate the ease of use and comfort of your current development tools?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Extremely poorMax:Excellent
Q05
Opinion Scale
In the past 14 days, how often did your development tools help you stay in a state of flow?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:NeverMax:Always
Q06
Long Text
If you could make one change to your development setup or tooling, what would most improve your day-to-day productivity?
Q07
Multiple Choice
Which role best describes your current work?
- Backend engineer
- Frontend engineer
- Full-stack engineer
- Mobile developer
- Data/ML engineer
- DevOps/SRE/Platform
- QA/Testing
- Student
- Other
Q08
Message
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses will help improve developer tooling and onboarding experiences. If you have any questions, please contact the research team.
Q09
Dropdown
For your most recent new project, approximately how long did the end-to-end setup take?
- Less than 15 minutes
- 15–30 minutes
- 31–60 minutes
- 1–2 hours
- 2–4 hours
- More than 4 hours
- I don't recall
Q10
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: My development tools integrate well with each other.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q11
Opinion Scale
Overall, how has your current toolchain affected your speed on routine development tasks?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Significantly slowed me downMax:Significantly sped me up
Q12
AI Interview
We'd like to learn more about your experience with developer tools. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
Q13
Multiple Choice
How many years of professional software development experience do you have?
- Less than 1
- 1–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- 11+
Q14
Opinion Scale
How difficult was cloning or downloading the project source?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very easyMax:Very difficult
Q15
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Keyboard shortcuts and navigation in my tools feel intuitive.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q16
Ranking
Thinking about the past 30 days, rank the following from your biggest productivity bottleneck (1) to smallest (6).
- Slow builds or installs
- Flaky tests
- IDE/editor lag or crashes
- Unclear or noisy tool feedback
- Context switching between tools
- Dependency resolution issues
Drag to rank
Q17
Multiple Choice
What is your primary operating system for development?
- Windows
- macOS
- Linux
- Other
Q18
Opinion Scale
How difficult was installing dependencies and packages?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very easyMax:Very difficult
Q19
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Error messages and feedback from my tools are clear and actionable.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q20
Opinion Scale
How likely are you to recommend your current development toolchain to a colleague?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q21
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your current employment status?
- Full-time employee
- Part-time employee
- Contractor/Freelancer
- Student
- Not currently employed
Q22
Opinion Scale
How difficult was configuring environment variables or credentials?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very easyMax:Very difficult
Q23
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Customizing my tools to fit my workflow is straightforward.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q24
Dropdown
Approximately how many employees work at your current organization?
- Just me
- 2–9
- 10–49
- 50–249
- 250–999
- 1,000+
- Not applicable
Q25
Opinion Scale
How difficult was connecting to databases or external services?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very easyMax:Very difficult
Q26
Dropdown
Which region are you primarily based in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q27
Opinion Scale
How difficult was running the first successful build?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very easyMax:Very difficult
Q28
Opinion Scale
How difficult was getting the test suite to pass?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very easyMax:Very difficult
Q29
Multiple Choice
Which of the following blockers, if any, did you encounter during your most recent project setup? Select all that apply.
- Unclear or outdated documentation
- Version conflicts or incompatibilities
- Access permissions or credentials issues
- Slow package downloads or installs
- Flaky or non-reproducible setup scripts
- OS-specific issues
- Corporate network or proxy constraints
- Large repository or asset downloads
- Hardware or architecture differences
- None of the above
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Breaks setup friction into discrete, measurable steps (cloning, dependency install, env/credential config, DB connections, first build, test suite) rather than asking one vague 'how was setup' question
- Includes a ranking question on the biggest productivity blockers over the past 30 days plus opinion-scale ratings on tool integration, shortcuts, error clarity, and customization
- Adds an AI follow-up interview so developers can elaborate in their own words on friction points a fixed-choice form would miss, with transparent prompts and auto-generated reporting
- Segments results by role, experience level, OS, employment status, org size, and region so DevEx bottlenecks can be benchmarked across cohorts, not just averaged
SurveySparrow
Software Developer Performance Review Template | For Software EngineersThis template targets the same software developer audience but is built for periodic performance/competency review rather than toolchain or setup friction. It's a ready-to-field static form, useful as a general engineering review starting point but not designed to diagnose onboarding or tooling pain points. Overlap with our survey is audience-level, not content-level.
What it does well
- Purpose-built for software engineers within an established employee-review template library
- Likely structured around standard performance/competency review dimensions (goals, code quality, collaboration)
- Ready to deploy without customization for basic review cycles
Where it falls short
- Focuses on performance evaluation, not setup friction, tooling usability, or productivity flow
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option to probe open-ended pain points
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Developer & Engineering
Developer Experience Survey: Docs, Samples & Events
Measures developer satisfaction and outcomes across documentation, code samples, and community events to surface actionable improvement priorities for developer relations and product teams.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
DevOps Reliability & Incident Response Assessment
Benchmarks uptime, incident response, on-call burden, error handling, and SLA priorities across engineering teams. Designed for SREs, DevOps engineers, and software developers managing production systems.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
Developer API Pricing & Willingness-to-Pay Research
Measures developer willingness to pay, pricing model preferences, and fairness perceptions for third-party APIs using Van Westendorp price sensitivity analysis and structured qualitative probes.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
Project Management Software Usage & Satisfaction Survey
Measures how teams actually use their project management tool day to day — adoption, feature-level satisfaction, and the friction points that drive people back to spreadsheets — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific recent workflow moment instead of general sentiment. Built for product, IT, and operations teams evaluating or renewing tools.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
CRM Software Developer & Integration Experience Survey
Evaluates how engineers, sales-ops developers, and technical admins experience building on, customizing, and integrating with your CRM platform — covering API reliability, documentation, customization limits, and workflow tooling — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific integration blocker behind the ratings, not just general sentiment.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
LLM Prompt Injection Awareness & Mitigation Practices Survey
Measures developer awareness of prompt injection threats, captures current security mitigation practices, and identifies gaps in LLM application defense. Designed for engineering teams building or evaluating LLM-integrated features.
View template