All templates
Sample Templates

Developer Integration Experience Survey

Captures developer feedback on API, SDK, and documentation experiences to identify friction points, measure satisfaction, and prioritize improvements post-onboarding or post-release.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

21 questions · ~10 min
Q01
Message

Welcome! This survey captures your feedback on our APIs, SDKs, and documentation based on your experience over the last 30 days. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate to improve our developer experience. There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest perspective. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. Estimated time: 10 minutes.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which integration methods have you used? Select all that apply.

  • REST API
  • GraphQL API
  • JavaScript SDK
  • iOS SDK
  • Android SDK
  • Webhooks
  • Other (please specify)
Q03
Dropdown

Which SDK did you primarily use?

  • JavaScript SDK
  • iOS SDK
  • Android SDK
  • I did not use an SDK
Q04
Opinion Scale

How clear were the API reference docs you used?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unclearMax:Very clear
Q05
Opinion Scale

How easy was it to find what you needed in the documentation?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q06
Dropdown

Approximately how many hours did your most recent integration take?

  • Less than 1 hour
  • 1–4 hours
  • 5–10 hours
  • 11–24 hours
  • 25–40 hours
  • More than 40 hours
Q07
Opinion Scale

Overall, how satisfied are you with the integration experience?

Scale: 17
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q08
Dropdown

What is your primary role?

  • Backend developer
  • Frontend developer
  • Mobile developer
  • Full-stack developer
  • DevOps/SRE
  • Product manager
  • Data/ML engineer
  • Other
Q09
Message

Thank you for your time! Your feedback directly helps us improve the developer experience.

Q10
Opinion Scale

How easy was it to set up the SDK you used?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q11
Opinion Scale

How consistent are endpoints and parameters across our APIs?

Scale: 17
Min:Very inconsistentMax:Very consistent
Q12
Multiple Choice

Which documentation resources did you rely on most? Select all that apply.

  • API reference
  • Getting started guides
  • Code samples/snippets
  • Tutorials/walkthroughs
  • Changelog/release notes
  • Community forums/Stack Overflow
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
Multiple Choice

Where did you encounter the most friction? Select all that apply.

  • Authentication and keys
  • Data model clarity
  • Pagination and filtering
  • Rate limits and quotas
  • Webhooks reliability
  • SDK versioning/compatibility
  • Testing sandbox
  • Error messages and troubleshooting
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to recommend our developer platform to a colleague?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unlikelyMax:Very likely
Q15
Dropdown

How many years have you worked with APIs/SDKs professionally?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–7 years
  • 8–12 years
  • 13+ years
Q16
Long Text

What, if anything, felt missing or confusing in the SDK?

Q17
Long Text

What one change would most reduce friction for you?

Q18
Dropdown

What is your company size?

  • 1 (just me)
  • 2–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
Q19
Multiple Choice

Did you also call our APIs directly, in addition to using an SDK?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not applicable
Q20
AI Interview

Based on your responses, we'd like to explore your integration experience in a bit more depth. Please share your thoughts and our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.

Q21
Dropdown

Where are you primarily located?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Sample Templates

Consumer Demand for Retail Recommerce Programs

Measures consumer awareness, purchase likelihood, barriers, and feature preferences for retailer take-back, buyback, and recommerce programs to validate demand and inform program design.

View template
Sample Templates

Passenger Biometric Boarding Trust & Privacy Survey

Measures air traveler comfort, trust, and privacy expectations around facial recognition and fingerprint verification at airports. Designed for airlines, airports, and travel-tech firms researching passenger acceptance of biometric boarding systems.

View template
Sample Templates

RAG System Quality & Grounding Assessment (Developer Survey)

Evaluates developer experiences with Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems across retrieval quality, grounding accuracy, evaluation practices, and infrastructure. Designed for ML engineers, backend engineers, and data scientists actively building or maintaining RAG pipelines.

View template
Sample Templates

Refund Experience & Policy Satisfaction Survey

Measures customer satisfaction with refund policies, processing speed, communication, and perceived effort. Designed for consumer research teams seeking to identify friction points and prioritize improvements in return and refund workflows.

View template
Sample Templates

Leisure Travel Behavior & Preferences Survey

Measures leisure travelers' trip frequency, destination decision drivers, transportation preferences, satisfaction, and likelihood to recommend — providing actionable segmentation and experience insights for travel brands, tourism boards, or academic research.

View template
Sample Templates

Content Findability & Search UX Assessment

Measures content findability, search satisfaction, navigation confidence, and filter effectiveness for recent site or app visitors. Designed for UX and information architecture teams seeking actionable data on how users locate and evaluate content.

View template