Q01
Message
All templatesNonprofit & Civic
Election Administration Confidence & Trust Survey
A non-partisan measure of public trust in how elections are run — confidence in vote counting, poll worker conduct, mail voting, and the information sources people rely on. It does not ask about candidates or parties. An AI follow-up digs into the 'why' behind each respondent's confidence rating so administrators can see which specific process step is driving trust or doubt.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
14 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how confident are you that votes in your area are counted accurately?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Completely confident
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired
How did you vote in the most recent election you participated in?
- In person on Election Day
- In person during early voting
- By mail or absentee ballot
- Did not vote in the most recent election
Q04
Slider MatrixRequired
How confident are you in each part of the election process?
5 rows, one slider each
- Ballots being counted accurately
- Voter rolls being accurate and secure
- Poll workers following proper procedures
- Voting equipment functioning correctly
- Mail ballots being processed securely
Slider 0–10Min:Not at all confidentMax:Completely confident
Q05
Rating Scale
If you voted in person, how would you rate your interaction with poll workers? (Skip if you didn't vote in person.)
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Very negativeMax:Very positive
Q06
Multiple Choice
If you voted by mail or absentee ballot, which best describes your experience?
- Did not vote by mail or absentee
- Requesting and returning my ballot was easy
- I had some difficulty requesting or returning my ballot
- I wasn't confident my mail ballot would actually be counted
Q07
RankingRequired
Rank these sources from most to least trusted for information about how to vote and how elections are run.
- Official election office website
- Local news coverage
- National news coverage
- Social media
- Friends or family
- Nonpartisan civic organizations (e.g., League of Women Voters)
Drag to rank
Q08
Multiple Choice
In the last election, did you personally encounter any of the following problems?
- Long wait times
- Confusion about voting location or hours
- Registration or ID issues
- Ballot or equipment malfunctions
Q09
AI Interview
Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's overall confidence rating in vote counting accuracy. If they rated it low (0-4), probe which specific stage of the process concerns them most — counting, mail ballot handling, poll worker conduct, or equipment — and what would meaningfully restore their trust. If they rated it high (7-10), probe what specific experience or information source gives them that confidence. Always clarify whether their view is grounded in personal experience voting or in something they read, saw, or heard secondhand.
Q10
Opinion ScaleRequired
How confident are you that the official results announced after your most recent election accurately reflected how people voted?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Completely confident
Q11
Multiple Choice
What is your age range?
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary or another identity
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Multiple Choice
Which best describes where you live?
- Urban
- Suburban
- Rural
- Prefer not to say
Q14
Message
That's everything — thank you for sharing your honest perspective. Your responses will be combined with others (never linked to your identity) into a report on where confidence in election administration is strong and where it needs to be rebuilt.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes an rating-scale item on vote-counting confidence paired with an AI follow-up interview step that adaptively probes the specific reasoning behind that rating, rather than stopping at a static number
- Separates the election process into distinct trust dimensions via a slider grid (counting, poll workers, mail voting, etc.) so administrators can pinpoint which step drives doubt
- Captures both in-person (rating on poll worker interaction) and mail/absentee (multiple-choice experience) voting paths, plus a ranking question on trusted information sources, giving process-level and channel-level detail
- Explicitly non-partisan in scope — no candidate or party questions — with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report to summarize findings for administrators
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Election Administration Confidence & Trust Survey” template?
The template includes 14 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on how elections are run. This survey is non-partisan — we're not as…” · “Overall, how confident are you that votes in your area are counted accurately?” · “How did you vote in the most recent election you participated in?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 14 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Nonprofit & Civic
2026 Midterm Voter Issue Priorities Survey
A nonpartisan pulse-check on what's driving voters ahead of the 2026 midterms: which issues matter most, how affordability is hitting household budgets, what qualities voters want in a candidate, and how likely they are to turn out. An AI follow-up digs into the concrete, personal reason behind each respondent's top issue instead of a generic label.
View templateNonprofit & Civic
U.S. Political News Consumption & Trust Survey
Measures how Americans discover, verify, and trust political news across cable, print, social media, podcasts, and word of mouth. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific story or moment that most shaped a respondent's trust — useful for newsrooms, media researchers, civic-tech teams, and policy groups tracking the health of the information ecosystem.
View templateNonprofit & Civic
U.S. Presidential Approval & Trust Tracker
Tracks how the public rates the current President's overall performance, trust, and handling of specific issues like the economy and foreign policy — for pollsters, newsrooms, and researchers who need a quick pulse read. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific event or issue actually driving each respondent's rating, not just the label they picked.
View templateNonprofit & Civic
News Media Accountability and Trust Survey
Assesses how news consumers judge the accountability practices of the outlets they follow — corrections, sourcing, transparency about ownership and conflicts of interest — and prioritizes which practices matter most to trust. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific incident where trust in a news source was gained or lost. Built for newsrooms, media watchdogs, and researchers studying press credibility.
View templateNonprofit & Civic
Election Preference & Issue Priorities Poll
Tracks voter intent, approval of current leadership, and which issues actually drive the decision — with an AI follow-up that surfaces the real reasoning behind a candidate choice instead of the socially acceptable version. Built for campaigns, pollsters, and newsrooms running pre-election tracking surveys.
View templateNonprofit & Civic
U.S. Voter Registration Experience Survey
Captures how eligible voters actually register in the U.S. — the method they used, where friction or confusion showed up, and how confident they feel their registration is valid — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment a barrier appeared. Built for election offices, civic tech teams, and voter engagement nonprofits.
View template