News Media Accountability and Trust Survey
Assesses how news consumers judge the accountability practices of the outlets they follow — corrections, sourcing, transparency about ownership and conflicts of interest — and prioritizes which practices matter most to trust. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific incident where trust in a news source was gained or lost. Built for newsrooms, media watchdogs, and researchers studying press credibility.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the last 30 days, how often have you come across a news story you suspected was inaccurate or misleading?
- Never
- Once or twice
- Several times
- Almost every time I checked the news
- Not sure
Thinking about the mainstream news outlets you follow, how would you rate them on each of the following?
- Issuing prompt, visible corrections when they get something wrong
- Citing original sources clearly
- Disclosing conflicts of interest
- Distinguishing opinion content from straight news reporting
- Disclosing who owns and funds them
How confident are you that major news outlets correct their mistakes when errors are pointed out?
The last time you noticed a factual error in a news story, what did you do?
- Contacted the outlet directly
- Posted about it on social media
- Mentioned it to friends or family
- Looked for confirmation from another source
- Stopped trusting that outlet
- Nothing, I let it go
From the accountability practices below, which matters most to you and which matters least when deciding whether to trust a news outlet?
- Issuing prompt, visible corrections
- Clearly citing original sources
- Disclosing conflicts of interest
- Distinguishing opinion from news reporting
- Disclosing ownership and funding
- Having an accessible corrections or complaints process
- Explaining how a story was reported
- Using independent fact-checking
If you had 100 points to spend on improving how much you trust a news outlet, how would you divide them across these factors?
- Prompt, visible corrections when errors occur
- Clear citation of sources
- Transparent ownership and funding
- Clear labeling of opinion vs. news content
- An accessible way to report errors or complaints
Read the correction notice below. Highlight the parts that make you more confident in the outlet, and the parts that make you less confident.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that the new policy took effect in March. It took effect in April. This version has been updated, and we regret the error. (Template n…
Reconstruct a specific, recent incident where the respondent's trust in a news outlet was gained or lost over an accountability issue — what happened, whether the outlet acknowledged it, and how the respondent reacted. Anchor on their confidence rating and the action they said they took after noticing an error, and probe what specifically the outlet would have needed to do to restore or strengthen trust. If they say they 'let it go,' probe whether that was resignation or genuine indifference.
That covers the accountability questions — thank you for the thoughtful answers. Just a few optional background questions to help us compare views across groups.
What is your age range?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Where do you primarily get your news? (select all that apply)
- Social media
- Television
- Print newspapers or magazines
- Online news sites or apps
- Radio
- Podcasts
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your political leaning?
- Left
- Center-left
- Center
- Center-right
- Right
- Prefer not to say
All done — thank you! Your responses will be combined with others to build a report on which accountability practices actually move audience trust, shared with newsroom and research partners.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond static rating questions with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific incident where the respondent's trust in a news outlet was gained or lost, surfacing concrete stories rather than just abstract scores.
- Uses a max-diff exercise and a constant-sum allocation to force real trade-offs between accountability practices (corrections, sourcing, ownership transparency) instead of letting everything score 'important.'
- Includes a text-highlight exercise where respondents mark which parts of an actual correction notice build their confidence, giving qualitative, evidence-level detail on what 'good' transparency looks like.
- Combines matrix ratings, an opinion-scale trust-in-corrections item, and behavioral recall questions (what did you do the last time you spotted an error) with an auto-generated report, on a platform with a free tier and transparent prompts.
QuestionPro
Media Accountability Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire/guide page listing example media accountability questions rather than an interactive, fielding-ready survey experience. It's a reasonable starting point for question wording but reads as static reference content. There's no indication of adaptive follow-up or built-in scoring on the page.
What it does well
- Provides ready-made sample question wording specifically on media accountability topics
- Backed by a large, established survey platform with broad question-type support
- Useful as a quick-start question bank for researchers drafting their own instrument
Where it falls short
- Presents fixed sample questions with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual incidents or reasoning
- No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published prompt methodology
- Appears to be a static questionnaire template/guide rather than a voice- or chat-based interview experience
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “News Media Accountability and Trust Survey” template?
The template includes 14 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your views on news media accountability — how outlets handle mistakes, sourcing…” · “In the last 30 days, how often have you come across a news story you suspected was inaccurate or misleading?” · “Thinking about the mainstream news outlets you follow, how would you rate them on each of the following?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 14 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Hardware Post-Installation Satisfaction Survey
Captures how customers experienced the installation of physical equipment — from scheduling and technician conduct to whether the hardware has performed as promised since setup. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment satisfaction dropped (or held), turning vague complaints into fixable installation-process issues.
View templateNews Trust Signals & Credibility Assessment
Measures which editorial, platform, and social cues drive audience trust in news sources across channels. Designed for media researchers, newsrooms, and platform teams seeking to benchmark perceived credibility and identify the trust signals that matter most.
View templateU.S. Political News Consumption & Trust Survey
Measures how Americans discover, verify, and trust political news across cable, print, social media, podcasts, and word of mouth. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific story or moment that most shaped a respondent's trust — useful for newsrooms, media researchers, civic-tech teams, and policy groups tracking the health of the information ecosystem.
View templateTraditional TV & Newspaper Usage Habits Survey
Measures how often people watch TV news and read newspapers, which formats and sources they trust most, and what factors drive their choice of news media — with an AI follow-up that uncovers the real story behind rising or falling engagement. Built for media researchers, broadcasters, and publishers tracking audience shifts.
View templateElection Administration Confidence & Trust Survey
A non-partisan measure of public trust in how elections are run — confidence in vote counting, poll worker conduct, mail voting, and the information sources people rely on. It does not ask about candidates or parties. An AI follow-up digs into the 'why' behind each respondent's confidence rating so administrators can see which specific process step is driving trust or doubt.
View templateMedia Consumption Habits & Platform Preferences Survey
Tracks how people actually spend time across streaming, social, news, podcasts, and print, which factors drive platform and subscription choices, and how much they trust what they consume. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind a recent change in habits — a dropped subscription, a new app, or a shift away from a channel — instead of just the stated reason.
View template