Q01
Message
All templatesEducation & Academic
End-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation
A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
26 questions · ~11 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
What is the primary format of this course?
- Lecture
- Seminar
- Lab/Studio
- Online (synchronous)
- Online (asynchronous)
- Hybrid
Q03
Opinion Scale
The instructor explained concepts clearly.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q04
Opinion Scale
How useful were the course materials (e.g., textbook, slides, readings) for learning key concepts?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q05
Dropdown
In the last 4 weeks, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on this course (including class time and independent study)?
- Fewer than 3 hours
- 3–5 hours
- 6–9 hours
- 10–14 hours
- 15–19 hours
- 20–24 hours
- 25 or more hours
Q06
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with this course overall?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all satisfiedMax:Extremely satisfied
Q07
Long Text
What specific changes, if any, would most improve the teaching or course materials?
Q08
Multiple Choice
What is your current program level?
- Undergraduate (lower division)
- Undergraduate (upper division)
- Graduate (Master's)
- Graduate (Doctoral)
- Professional/Continuing education
Q09
Message
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve future course offerings.
Q10
Dropdown
How often did you attend scheduled class sessions this term?
- Every session
- Most sessions
- About half
- Rarely
- Never
Q11
Opinion Scale
The instructor was well-prepared for class sessions.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q12
Multiple Choice
Which of the following resources did you use most often in the last 4 weeks? Select all that apply.
- Textbook
- Lecture slides
- Recorded videos
- Readings/articles
- Practice problems/quizzes
- Discussion boards
- Lab manuals
- Software/tools
- Instructor notes
- Other (please specify)
Q13
Multiple Choice
Compared with your expectations, the workload this term was…
- Much lighter than expected
- Slightly lighter than expected
- About right
- Slightly heavier than expected
- Much heavier than expected
Q14
Opinion Scale
How likely are you to recommend this course to a fellow student?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q15
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience in this course.
Q16
Multiple Choice
What is your current enrollment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Non-degree/Auditing
Q17
Opinion Scale
The instructor encouraged student questions and participation.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q18
Opinion Scale
How easy was it to access course materials (e.g., links, platforms, files)?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q19
Opinion Scale
The pace of the course this term was…
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Much too slowMax:Much too fast
Q20
AI Interview
We'd like to learn more about your course experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.
Q21
Dropdown
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–20
- 21–24
- 25–29
- 30–39
- 40–49
- 50+
- Prefer not to say
Q22
Opinion Scale
The instructor provided timely and helpful feedback on assignments.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q23
Multiple Choice
Which of the following best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q24
Opinion Scale
Overall, how effective was the instructor in this course?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all effectiveMax:Extremely effective
Q25
Dropdown
Where are you primarily located while taking this course?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q26
Ranking
Rank the following teaching methods from most helpful to least helpful for your learning.
- Live demonstrations
- Group discussions
- Problem-solving exercises
- Lectures
- Peer review
- Real-world examples
Drag to rank
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that lets students elaborate on their ratings in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice questions
- Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on instructor clarity, preparation, feedback, and pace with a ranking question on teaching methods for richer, comparable data
- Captures workload and material-usage patterns (hours per week, resource usage in last 4 weeks, access ease) alongside satisfaction and NPS-style recommendation questions
- Pairs quantitative scoring with two open-text questions and an AI interview, then auto-generates a report — with a free tier and $50/mo Business plan (no academic-only tier)
Jotform
Student Course Evaluation Form TemplateA static, drag-and-drop form template covering standard course/instructor rating fields. It's built for quick deployment and customization within Jotform's broader form-builder ecosystem, but it doesn't dynamically follow up on student responses. Reporting is limited to Jotform's standard form-response views rather than an automated evaluation report.
What it does well
- Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
- Likely integrates with Jotform's wider app/payment/notification ecosystem
- Quick to deploy for basic end-of-term feedback collection
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open responses
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No published methodology for automated per-response quality scoring
QuestionPro
Course evaluation & improvement survey questions + Sample questionnaire templateThis page reads more as a guide with sample survey questions and a downloadable questionnaire than a ready-to-field interactive template. It's useful as a question-bank reference for building a course evaluation survey, but it doesn't demonstrate a live adaptive experience. Actual fielding would require assembling and configuring the questions within QuestionPro's survey platform.
What it does well
- Broad sample question bank covering multiple course-evaluation dimensions
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics tools
- Useful as a reference/starting point for drafting evaluation questions
Where it falls short
- Presented as a question list/guide rather than a fielding-ready adaptive template
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview capability
- No transparent, published AI-prompt methodology
SurveyMonkey
Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback GuideA standard static survey template aimed at training/course evaluation, backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics dashboards. It covers typical satisfaction and effectiveness questions but relies on fixed question flows rather than conversational follow-up. Framed generally for 'training' evaluation rather than specifically for higher-education instructor/course review.
What it does well
- Mature survey platform with established analytics and benchmarking
- Simple, familiar template structure for quick setup
- Wide integration options within SurveyMonkey's ecosystem
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on student answers
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task options
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure
SurveySparrow
Sample Course Evaluation Form Template | Collect Instructor FeedbackSurveySparrow's template uses its signature conversational, chat-style form UI, which can feel more engaging than a static grid of questions. However, this conversational styling is a fixed-script presentation layer, not an adaptive interview that reasons about individual answers. It's positioned as a general instructor-feedback template rather than one built for detailed workload/pace analysis with AI-generated reporting.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style presentation that may improve completion rates
- Mobile-friendly form design typical of SurveySparrow templates
- Established survey platform with reporting dashboards
Where it falls short
- Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task functionality
- No automated per-response quality scoring or disclosed AI methodology
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “End-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation” template?
The template includes 26 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the End-of-Term Course Evaluation. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes and asks about your experience…” · “What is the primary format of this course?” · “The instructor explained concepts clearly.”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 26 questions in about 11 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Education & Academic
Capstone Project Support & Learning Outcomes Survey
Evaluates students' capstone project experiences—including mentorship quality, resource availability, skill development, and key challenges—to inform data-driven program improvement decisions.
View templateEducation & Academic
Course Evaluation: Teaching Effectiveness & Workload
Collects structured student feedback on instructor effectiveness, course materials, workload balance, and learning outcomes to inform end-of-term course improvements at the undergraduate or graduate level.
View templateEducation & Academic
Course Experience & Learning Outcomes Feedback Survey
A structured instrument for collecting student feedback on course satisfaction, instructional effectiveness, and learning outcomes. Designed for end-of-term deployment to support data-driven course improvement.
View templateEducation & Academic
End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey
Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.
View templateEducation & Academic
Professor Teaching Effectiveness Evaluation Survey
Measures how students experience a professor's teaching across clarity, engagement, feedback, availability, and fairness, plus overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend. Built for academic departments and course coordinators running end-of-term reviews, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment or assignment that most shaped a student's rating.
View templateEducation & Academic
End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey
Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.
View template