Internal Communication & Information Flow Survey
Measures how well information, decisions, and priorities actually reach employees across teams and levels — covering channels, managers, and cross-department flow. An AI follow-up interview digs into a real recent breakdown to surface what would have actually fixed it, not just abstract complaints.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the last 30 days, how often did you have the information you needed to do your job well?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
How much do you agree with each statement about communication at our company?
- Leadership shares information transparently
- I understand how major decisions get made
- Information flows well between different departments/teams
- I get updates in time to actually act on them
- The tools we use for communication work well for my day-to-day needs
How well-informed do you feel about the company's current goals and priorities?
Which channel do you rely on most for work-related communication day to day?
- Chat app (e.g. Slack, Teams)
- Video calls
- In-person meetings
- Company intranet or wiki
- Project management tool
Which of these improvements would make the biggest difference to communication at our company, and which would matter least?
- More frequent updates from leadership
- Clearer, more organized project documentation
- Faster responses from other teams/departments
- Better tools for team collaboration
- More chances to give feedback upward
- Less email/message overload
- More live team or all-hands meetings
- More transparency around how decisions get made
How would you rate your direct manager's communication with you?
In the past month, how often have you felt out of the loop on decisions that affected your work?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent instance where communication broke down at work — what was supposed to happen, what actually happened, and what impact it had on their work. Anchor on their lowest-rated item from the agreement statements or the improvement they picked as mattering most, and probe concretely what change would have prevented the breakdown. If they say communication is generally fine, ask about a time they were surprised by a decision or change they should have known about earlier.
Just a few quick background questions to help us spot patterns — all optional.
Which department or team are you part of?
- Engineering/Product
- Sales
- Marketing
- Customer Support
- Operations
- Finance/Legal
- HR/People
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been with the company?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your role level?
- Individual contributor
- Team lead/supervisor
- Manager
- Senior leadership/executive
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with your colleagues' feedback to identify where communication is breaking down and prioritize fixes. No individual answers will be shared.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a matrix and multiple-choice questions covering channel reliance, manager communication, and how often employees feel out of the loop on decisions — not just a single satisfaction score
- Pairs quantitative items (rating, opinion scale, max-diff on improvement priorities) with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through one specific, recent communication breakdown
- The AI interview digs past abstract complaints to surface what would have actually fixed that specific incident, giving qualitative root-cause data alongside the quantitative scores
- Closes with optional department, tenure, and role-level questions so patterns can be segmented by team and level, with results auto-compiled into a report
QuestionPro
Company Communication Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire and question bank for internal communication surveys rather than a ready-to-field adaptive interview tool. It's useful as a reference for question wording and covers many of the same themes (channels, managers, awareness of goals) but is presented as a static template/guide, not a product with built-in follow-up logic.
What it does well
- Broad library of pre-written communication survey questions to draw from
- Established survey platform with standard question types (multiple choice, rating, matrix)
- Content framed around common internal communication themes like channel use and manager communication
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe a specific recent breakdown — respondents just answer fixed questions
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Brand Awareness, Attitudes & Usage (AAU) Tracker
A classic funnel study for brand and category teams: measures unaided and aided awareness, consideration, recent usage, and attitudes toward your brand versus competitors, plus a purchase-driver trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind consideration and switching decisions — the 'why' that closed-ended funnel questions can't capture.
View templateNews Media Accountability and Trust Survey
Assesses how news consumers judge the accountability practices of the outlets they follow — corrections, sourcing, transparency about ownership and conflicts of interest — and prioritizes which practices matter most to trust. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific incident where trust in a news source was gained or lost. Built for newsrooms, media watchdogs, and researchers studying press credibility.
View templateHardware Post-Installation Satisfaction Survey
Captures how customers experienced the installation of physical equipment — from scheduling and technician conduct to whether the hardware has performed as promised since setup. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment satisfaction dropped (or held), turning vague complaints into fixable installation-process issues.
View templateIT Pre-Installation Readiness & Expectations Survey
Captures a client site's readiness before an IT hardware, software, or network installation — infrastructure state, scheduling constraints, and stakeholder concerns. An AI follow-up interview digs into the technical dependencies and edge cases that determine whether installation day goes smoothly, helping IT teams and project managers de-risk the rollout.
View templateOnline Bookstore Customer Experience Survey
Tracks how readers discover, buy, and receive books from your online store — covering selection, pricing, delivery, and format preferences — with an AI follow-up that digs into the story behind their most recent order and their recommendation score. Built for bookstore teams optimizing catalog, fulfillment, and retention.
View templateAltruistic Gift-Giving Motivations & Behavior Survey
Explores how people actually give — money, time, or goods — to causes and people outside their immediate family, and unpacks the emotional, social, and practical trade-offs behind those choices. Built for nonprofits, gifting platforms, and CSR teams; the AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind a respondent's most recent act of generosity instead of the tidy, stated reason.
View template