Q01
Message
All templatesIndustry-Specific
Internal Knowledge Management Effectiveness Survey
Assesses whether employees can actually find, trust, and contribute to your organization's documentation, wikis, and knowledge base — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real moment someone got stuck instead of relying on abstract satisfaction ratings. Built for IT, L&D, and operations teams evaluating or improving a knowledge management system.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
14 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired
In a typical week, how often do you search internal documentation or a knowledge base to do your job?
- Daily or almost daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- A few times a month
- Rarely or never
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired
When you need specific information to do your job, how easy is it to find something accurate?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Where do you most often go first when you need information you don't already know?
- Company wiki or knowledge base
- Shared drive or folder
- Asking a teammate directly
- Chat/Slack search
- Email search
- A manager or team lead
- Trial and error / figuring it out myself
Q05
MatrixRequired
How much do you agree with each statement about our current documentation and knowledge base?
5 rows × 5 columns
- The information I find is accurate
- The information I find is up to date
- Content is easy to search and locate
- It's clear who owns or maintains each document
- New employees could get up to speed using it alone
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
Rating ScaleRequired
Overall, how satisfied are you with our current knowledge management tool(s)?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q07
Multiple ChoiceRequired
In the last 3 months, how often have you added, corrected, or updated a document or wiki page yourself?
- Never
- Once
- A few times
- Regularly, it's part of my routine
Q08
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
Which of these improvements would help you most, and which would help you least?
- Better search functionality
- Clear ownership for each page
- More consistent formatting/templates
- Faster updates when things change
- Easier way to flag outdated content
- AI-assisted search or summaries
- Better onboarding to the tool itself
- Fewer duplicate or conflicting pages
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most helpfulWorst:Least helpful
Q09
AI Interview
Ask the respondent to walk through the most recent specific time they needed information and couldn't find it easily: what they were trying to do, where they looked first, how long it took, and what they ended up doing instead (asking a person, giving up, guessing). Probe for the actual business impact — delay, rework, wrong answer given to a customer — not just frustration. If they say finding information is easy, ask what makes their team's documentation better than others they've encountered.
Q10
Multiple Choice
What stops you from contributing more to shared documentation? Select all that apply.
- Not enough time
- Unclear where or how to add content
- Not sure my input is 'official' enough
- No recognition or incentive to do it
- Past edits got overwritten or ignored
- Don't know who to check with before publishing
Q11
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely are you to recommend our current knowledge management tool to a new colleague joining your team?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q12
Multiple Choice
Which department or team are you part of?
- Engineering / IT
- Operations
- Sales
- Customer Support
- Marketing
- HR / People
- Finance
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Multiple Choice
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 2 years
- 2 to 5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Q14
Message
That's everything, thank you! Your answers, along with everyone else's, will directly shape how we prioritize fixes to our documentation and knowledge base this quarter.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through a real recent moment they got stuck finding information, instead of relying only on abstract satisfaction ratings
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale on findability, rating on tool satisfaction, matrix agreement statements, max-diff prioritization of improvements) with qualitative depth from the AI interview
- Directly measures contribution behavior (how often employees add or correct documentation) and the specific barriers stopping them from contributing more, not just consumption habits
- Segments by department and tenure so IT, L&D, and operations teams can see whether pain points differ by team or how long someone has been onboarded onto the knowledge base
QuestionPro
Company - Knowledge Management Survey TemplateThis is a fielding-ready template covering satisfaction and usage of internal knowledge management systems, similar in topic scope to ours. It relies on standard static question types (ratings, multiple choice) rather than adaptive follow-up, so depth comes from the number of questions asked rather than dynamic probing. Good for benchmarking broad sentiment but not for surfacing specific stuck-moments or root causes in a respondent's own words.
What it does well
- Purpose-built specifically for knowledge management topic, not a generic repurposed template
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad template library and distribution tools
- Likely covers standard KM satisfaction metrics familiar to HR/IT survey designers
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct a specific real incident where someone couldn't find information
- No indication of per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for observing actual search behavior
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Internal Knowledge Management Effectiveness Survey” template?
The template includes 14 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes on this! We're looking at how well our documentation, wiki, and knowledge base actually…” · “In a typical week, how often do you search internal documentation or a knowledge base to do your job?” · “When you need specific information to do your job, how easy is it to find something accurate?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 14 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Industry-Specific
Workplace Diversity and Inclusion Climate Survey
Measures how included, respected, and fairly treated employees feel across belonging, fairness, and access to opportunity, plus whether they've witnessed or experienced exclusionary behavior. Built for HR and DEI teams benchmarking climate over time. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment behind a respondent's inclusion score instead of leaving it as just a number.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Internal Knowledge Findability & Trust Audit
Assesses how employees find, evaluate, and trust internal knowledge resources—measuring findability, content quality, ownership clarity, and tool effectiveness to prioritize knowledge management improvements.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Knowledge Base Content Effectiveness Survey
Measures article findability, clarity, completeness, and task-completion outcomes for knowledge base users. Use to identify content gaps and prioritize help center improvements.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Industry Knowledge Check & Training Confidence Survey
A multiple-choice knowledge assessment for industry-specific training, certification prep, or compliance programs — checks whether staff can correctly apply role-relevant rules and scenarios, then uses an AI follow-up to reconstruct the reasoning behind wrong or low-confidence answers so trainers can fix the actual gap, not just the test score.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Technical Documentation Usability & Effectiveness Survey
Evaluates whether developers, engineers, and other technical users can actually find answers, understand concepts, and finish tasks using your documentation — not just whether they like it. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the last real incident where the docs helped or failed them, surfacing specifics a satisfaction score alone would miss.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Internal Company Communications Effectiveness Survey
Evaluates how well your company's internal communications inform, engage, and reach employees across channels like email, town halls, and chat tools. Includes a statement battery and a prioritization exercise, plus an AI follow-up that digs into a specific recent example of a communication that worked or fell short.
View template