All templates
Employee & HR

IT Role Evaluation & Future Staffing Needs Survey

Evaluates how well your current IT team is staffed, skilled, and equipped to meet workload demands, then helps forecast where hiring and budget should go next. Built for IT leaders, People/HR partners, and workforce planners; the AI follow-up interview turns staffing-gap flags and confidence ratings into concrete examples of what broke, what it cost, and what's most fragile going forward.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

12 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us evaluate our IT team's current workload and where we should invest in hiring next. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6-8 minutes, and honest answers — including where things are stretched thin — are the most useful.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Which best describes your current role in the IT organization?

  • IT manager or team lead
  • Individual contributor / engineer
  • IT director or VP
  • HR / People partner supporting IT
  • Other
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

Over the past 3 months, how would you rate your team's capacity to complete IT work on time?

Scale: 17
Min:Consistently overwhelmedMax:Comfortable capacity margin
Q04
MatrixRequired

Rate your current IT organization on each of the following.

5 rows × 5 columns
  • Overall staffing levels
  • Skill coverage for emerging technologies
  • Speed of hiring or backfilling open roles
  • Budget for tools and training
  • Cross-training / backup coverage for critical systems
Columns: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
Multiple Choice

Which IT functions are most understaffed right now?

  • Cybersecurity
  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Software development / engineering
  • Data & analytics
  • IT support / help desk
  • Network engineering
  • DevOps / platform engineering
Q06
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Thinking about hiring over the next 12 months, which of these roles matter most to prioritize?

  • Cybersecurity analyst
  • Cloud infrastructure engineer
  • Software developer / engineer
  • Data engineer or analyst
  • DevOps / platform engineer
  • IT support specialist
  • AI / ML engineer
  • Network engineer
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most critical to hireWorst:Least critical to hire
Q07
Point AllocationRequired

If you had 100 points of future IT hiring budget to allocate across these areas, how would you split it?

  • Cybersecurity
  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Software development
  • Data & analytics
  • IT support
  • Emerging tech (AI/ML)
Allocate 100 points
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired

How confident are you that your current IT team can meet business demands over the next 12 months?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q09
AI Interview

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's confidence rating and the functions they flagged as understaffed. Ask for a specific recent example of when a capacity gap actually delayed or degraded a project or service, what the business impact was, and what stopgap was used (contractors, overtime, deprioritized work). If confidence was rated highly, ask what's most fragile that could break that confidence in the next 12 months. Push for concrete numbers — headcount short, timeline slipped, cost incurred — wherever possible.

Q10
Long Text

Beyond what you've already flagged, what's the single skill or role gap you're most worried about for the next 12 months, and why?

Q11
Multiple Choice

How many people currently work on your IT team, including yourself?

  • 1-5
  • 6-15
  • 16-50
  • 51-150
  • More than 150
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Message

That's everything — thank you! Your ratings and the follow-up interview will feed directly into our IT staffing plan and hiring priorities for the next year.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Pairs quantitative staffing signals (capacity ratings, matrix scoring, MaxDiff prioritization, budget-allocation constant sum) with an AI follow-up interview that turns low-confidence flags into concrete stories of what broke and what it cost.
  • Asks respondents directly which IT functions are understaffed and then probes those same flagged areas conversationally, rather than leaving gaps as an unexplained checkbox.
  • Includes a forced-tradeoff 100-point budget allocation exercise so hiring priorities are ranked, not just rated in the abstract.
  • Closes with an open-ended prompt for the one skill/role gap not yet captured, then feeds ratings plus the full interview into an auto-generated report for IT leaders and HR partners.

QuestionPro

IT Job Evaluation and Future Staff Needs Survey Template

This is a directly comparable, fielding-ready template covering IT staffing evaluation and future hiring needs, the closest match in scope to our template. It relies on standard static question types (likely rating scales and multiple choice) rather than any conversational follow-up. As a template library entry, it's ready to deploy but built around fixed-question logic rather than adaptive probing.

What it does well

  • Purpose-built for the same IT staffing/future-needs use case, so question framing is domain-relevant out of the box
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad distribution and reporting tooling
  • Likely includes standard IT-role and workload rating items similar to core sections of our survey

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to turn a low confidence score or 'understaffed function' flag into a concrete example of what broke or what it cost
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for richer qualitative detail
  • No transparent, published interview prompts or automated per-response quality scoring, so it's unclear how open-ended responses are evaluated or synthesized

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “IT Role Evaluation & Future Staffing Needs Survey” template?

The template includes 12 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us evaluate our IT team's current workload and where we should invest in hiring…” · “Which best describes your current role in the IT organization?” · “Over the past 3 months, how would you rate your team's capacity to complete IT work on time?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 12 questions in about 7 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Employee & HR

Employee Appreciation & Recognition Culture Survey

Measures how valued employees feel, which recognition channels actually land, and how often meaningful appreciation happens day to day. Includes a best-worst trade-off on recognition types and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment recognition worked (or fell flat) instead of generic satisfaction scores. Built for HR and people teams auditing or redesigning a recognition program.

View template
Employee & HR

New Hire Staff Request Intake Survey

Captures the business case, urgency, and role requirements behind a hiring manager's request for a new staff position, so HR can prioritize openings and staff the recruiting pipeline correctly. An AI follow-up interview digs into what happens if the role stays unfilled and where trade-offs on candidate qualifications are acceptable.

View template
Employee & HR

Headcount Request & Position Justification Survey

Captures the business case behind a request to open or backfill a role — driver, urgency, cost, alternatives considered, and success metrics — for HR and Finance to evaluate headcount requests consistently. An AI follow-up interview stress-tests the requester's reasoning on why now, why this level, and what happens if the request is delayed or denied.

View template
Employee & HR

IT Pre-Installation Readiness & Expectations Survey

Captures a client site's readiness before an IT hardware, software, or network installation — infrastructure state, scheduling constraints, and stakeholder concerns. An AI follow-up interview digs into the technical dependencies and edge cases that determine whether installation day goes smoothly, helping IT teams and project managers de-risk the rollout.

View template
Employee & HR

Employee Computer & Equipment Request Survey

Captures why an employee needs a new or replacement computer, how urgent the request is, and which specs and software matter most — built for IT and workplace teams triaging equipment requests. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific tasks the current device can't handle so IT can right-size the replacement instead of guessing.

View template
Employee & HR

Employee Information & Communication Needs Survey

Captures up-to-date employee profile details (team, tenure, work location) alongside how well-informed and equipped staff feel by company communications and HR resources. Includes an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment information broke down, so HR can fix real gaps instead of guessing.

View template