All templates

Manager 1:1 Effectiveness Pulse Survey

Assesses the cadence, quality, and follow-through of manager one-on-one meetings over a 90-day period. Designed for HR and People teams seeking actionable data to improve meeting practices and manager effectiveness.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

28 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Manager 1:1 Effectiveness Pulse. This short survey asks about your one-on-one meetings with your direct manager over the past 90 days. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate — no individual answers will be shared with your manager or leadership. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we simply want your honest perspective. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. If you had no 1:1 meetings in this period, please select 'Not applicable' where offered.

Q02
Multiple Choice

In the past 3 months, did you have at least one scheduled 1:1 meeting with your direct manager?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
Multiple Choice

How often were 1:1s with your manager typically scheduled in the past 3 months?

  • Weekly
  • Every 2 weeks
  • Monthly
  • Less often than monthly
  • Irregular / only as needed
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q04
Opinion Scale

Overall, how useful have your 1:1s been for you in the past 3 months?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q05
Multiple Choice

How are action items from your 1:1s usually captured?

  • Shared document or tracker
  • Ticket or project tool (e.g., Jira, Asana)
  • Chat or email recap
  • Verbal agreement only
  • I capture my own notes separately
  • Not applicable (no action items typically set)
Q06
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, what one change would make your 1:1s more valuable for you?

Q07
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager (manages direct reports)
  • Leads managers (manager of managers)
  • Other / Not sure
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input is valuable and will be used to help improve the quality of 1:1 meetings across the organization.

Q09
Multiple Choice

What was the typical length of your 1:1s in the past 3 months?

  • 15 minutes or less
  • 30 minutes
  • 45 minutes
  • 60 minutes
  • More than 60 minutes
  • Varies significantly
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q10
Opinion Scale

How useful have your 1:1s been for getting feedback on your work and performance?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q11
Multiple Choice

Who is primarily accountable for following up on 1:1 action items?

  • Mostly me
  • Mostly my manager
  • Shared evenly
  • It varies by item
  • We rarely set action items
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q12
AI Interview

You've shared some thoughts about your 1:1 meetings. I'd like to explore a couple of those in more depth. Can you tell me more about what's working well or what you'd most like to change about your 1:1s with your manager?

Q13
Dropdown

What is your primary function or department?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Design / UX
  • Data / Analytics
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support / Success
  • HR / People
  • Finance / Legal / Operations
  • Other
Q14
Opinion Scale

In the past 3 months, how often were your scheduled 1:1s canceled or rescheduled?

Scale: 15
Min:NeverMax:Very often
Q15
Opinion Scale

How useful have your 1:1s been for discussing your career growth and development?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q16
Dropdown

Approximately what share of action items from your 1:1s are completed by the next meeting?

  • None (0%)
  • About 25%
  • About 50%
  • About 75%
  • Nearly all (90%+)
  • Not applicable (no action items or 1:1s)
Q17
Dropdown

How long have you been at your current company?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
Multiple Choice

How is the agenda typically set for your 1:1s?

  • I prepare most of it
  • My manager prepares most of it
  • We co-create it in advance
  • We co-create it at the start of the meeting
  • There is usually no agenda
  • Not applicable (no 1:1s)
Q19
Opinion Scale

How useful have your 1:1s been for removing blockers or escalating issues?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q20
Opinion Scale

Action items from my 1:1s are clear and specific.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q21
Dropdown

How long have you reported to your current direct manager?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
Opinion Scale

How useful have your 1:1s been for aligning on priorities and goals?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q23
Dropdown

What is the approximate size of the team you work with most closely (including your manager)?

  • Just me (1)
  • 2–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21–50
  • 51+
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
Opinion Scale

How useful have your 1:1s been for building a stronger working relationship with your manager?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q25
Multiple Choice

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • On-site
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
Opinion Scale

My manager comes prepared to our 1:1s.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q27
Dropdown

Which region best describes where you are primarily based?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
Ranking

Rank the following topics by how much time they typically receive in your 1:1s, from most time (1) to least time (5).

  1. Status updates and project progress
  2. Problem-solving and removing blockers
  3. Career development and growth
  4. Feedback (giving and receiving)
  5. Relationship building and well-being
Drag to rank

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond static Likert questions with six separate usefulness ratings (overall, feedback, career growth, blockers, priorities, relationship-building) so HR can pinpoint exactly which function of the 1:1 is failing.
  • Includes a ranking question on topic time allocation plus concrete process questions (agenda ownership, action-item capture method, completion-rate dropdown, accountability owner) that diagnose process breakdowns, not just sentiment.
  • The open-text 'one change' question feeds directly into an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes the respondent's own wording for specifics — something a fixed-question form cannot do.
  • Rich segmentation block (role level, department, tenure with company and with manager, team size, work arrangement, region) lets People teams cut results by cohort without redesigning the survey.

Jotform

Manager Effectiveness Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use static form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, aimed at general manager feedback collection. It's easy to customize and embed but is a fixed-question form rather than an adaptive interview instrument. Good for quick deployment, less suited to deep qualitative follow-up.

What it does well

  • Simple drag-and-drop customization
  • Large existing template/integration ecosystem
  • Fast to deploy for basic feedback collection

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — all respondents see the same fixed question set
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions probe deeper

QuestionPro

Manager Effectiveness Survey Template

Part of QuestionPro's broad enterprise survey template library, with the platform's standard analytics and reporting tools behind it. It targets general manager-effectiveness measurement rather than the specific 90-day 1:1 cadence and follow-through focus of our template. Strong on statistical reporting, static on question logic.

What it does well

  • Established enterprise survey/analytics platform
  • Broad reporting and dashboard capabilities
  • Large template library for HR use cases

Where it falls short

  • Static branching logic only, no true adaptive AI interviewing of open responses
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated response-level quality scoring disclosed

SurveySparrow

Manager Effectiveness Survey Template

Delivered through SurveySparrow's conversational chat-style survey UI, which makes the experience feel more personal than a traditional form. It's still a pre-set question flow rather than an AI system that generates follow-ups based on what the respondent actually says. Useful for engagement-friendly presentation, not deep probing.

What it does well

  • Conversational, chat-like UI improves respondent experience
  • Employee-experience-focused template library
  • Mobile-friendly presentation

Where it falls short

  • Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI interviewing — no dynamic follow-up generation
  • No guided task or screen-share capability
  • No transparent prompt/methodology disclosure

Typeform

Manager Effectiveness Survey Template

A polished, one-question-at-a-time conversational form template well known for clean design and completion rates. Logic jumps allow some branching, but there's no AI generating new questions from respondent answers. Best suited to lightweight, aesthetically pleasing pulse checks rather than deep diagnostic interviews.

What it does well

  • Highly polished, well-tested conversational UX
  • Logic-jump branching for basic personalization
  • Wide brand recognition and ease of sharing

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — logic jumps are pre-authored, not generated from response content
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.