Q01
Message
All templatesEducation & Academic
Parent Attitudes Toward AI Tutors For Their Children
Measures how comfortable, trusting, and price-sensitive parents are about AI tutoring tools for their kids — covering current usage, top concerns, feature priorities, and willingness to pay. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific worry or hesitation behind each parent's answers, surfacing what would actually change their mind.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
12 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Which best describes your family's experience with AI tutoring tools (apps or platforms that use AI to help kids with schoolwork)?
- Currently using one regularly
- Tried one but stopped
- Considered one but haven't used it
- Not aware of these tools before now
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how comfortable are you with the idea of your child using an AI tutor to help with schoolwork?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all comfortableMax:Extremely comfortable
Q04
MatrixRequired
How much of a concern is each of the following when it comes to your child using an AI tutor?
5 rows × 4 columns
- Data privacy and security
- Less human interaction
- Accuracy of the AI's answers
- Increased screen time
- Cost compared to a human tutor
Columns: Not a concern · Minor concern · Moderate concern · Major concern
Q05
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
From the features below, which matters most and which matters least to you in an AI tutor?
- Personalized pace matched to my child's level
- Instant feedback on answers
- Available any time of day
- Lower cost than a human tutor
- Alignment with what's taught in school
- Progress reports I can review
- Content and safety filtering for kids
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most important to meWorst:Least important to me
Q06
Rating ScaleRequired
How much do you trust an AI tutor to give your child accurate, age-appropriate help?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all trustworthyMax:Completely trustworthy
Q07
Price Sensitivity (Van Westendorp)Required
Thinking about a monthly subscription to an AI tutoring service for your child, please answer the four pricing questions below.
- At what monthly price would this service be so cheap you'd worry about its quality?
- At what monthly price would this service start to feel like a bargain?
- At what monthly price would this service start to feel expensive, but you'd still consider it?
- At what monthly price would this service be too expensive to consider at all?
Q08
AI Interview
Probe the reasoning behind this parent's comfort score and their top-rated concern. If they flagged data privacy or accuracy as major concerns, ask what specific evidence or safeguard would make them more willing to trust the tool. If they said they haven't used one, ask what's holding them back and what would prompt them to try it. If they're already using one, ask for a concrete recent example of how it helped or fell short.
Q09
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely are you to recommend an AI tutor to another parent?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q10
Multiple Choice
What age group is the child you have most in mind when answering this survey?
- Under 5
- 5-8
- 9-12
- 13-15
- 16-18
- Prefer not to say
Q11
Multiple Choice
Which range best describes your household income?
- Under $50,000
- $50,000-$99,999
- $100,000-$149,999
- $150,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Message
Thank you for sharing your perspective! Your answers will help shape more trustworthy, useful AI tutoring tools for families like yours.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that probes the specific worry behind each parent's comfort score and top concern, surfacing what would actually change their mind — something static question lists can't do
- Pairs a Van Westendorp pricing exercise with a MaxDiff feature-priority question, so willingness-to-pay and feature trade-offs are measured with real trade-off methodology, not just single rating items
- Covers the full funnel in one flow: current usage, comfort, trust, concern ranking (matrix), feature priorities, pricing sensitivity, and likelihood to recommend, plus household income and child age group for segmentation
- Every prompt used in the AI follow-up interview is transparent and viewable, and results roll into an auto-generated report — no manual coding of open-ends required
Jotform
60+ Parent Feedback FormsThis is a broad template category/gallery page for parent feedback forms rather than a single fielding-ready survey on AI tutoring attitudes. It's useful for quickly assembling a generic form with drag-and-drop fields, but none of the listed forms are built around AI tutor comfort, trust, or pricing specifically.
What it does well
- Large library of pre-built parent feedback form layouts to start from
- Familiar drag-and-drop form builder for quick customization
- Supports standard question types (ratings, multiple choice, short answer)
Where it falls short
- No template addresses AI tutoring specifically, let alone parent trust, concerns, or pricing sensitivity toward it
- Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind an answer
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated analysis/report generation
SurveySparrow
Parental Involvement Survey Questionnaire For StudentsA ready-to-use template, but it's scoped to general parental involvement in a child's schooling (homework help, communication with teachers, engagement) rather than attitudes toward AI tutoring tools specifically. Good conversational form styling, but the content doesn't touch trust, comfort, or pricing for AI tutors.
What it does well
- Purpose-built for the parent/education audience, so question phrasing is age-appropriate and school-context aware
- Conversational, mobile-friendly survey format typical of SurveySparrow
- Easy to customize question wording for a different education sub-topic
Where it falls short
- No questions on AI tutoring comfort, trust, or price sensitivity — would require substantial rewriting to fit this use case
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into the 'why' behind a parent's rating — all questions are fixed and identical for every respondent
- No transparent prompt library or automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Parent Attitudes Toward AI Tutors For Their Children” template?
The template includes 12 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Hi! We're exploring how parents feel about AI tutoring tools for their kids — the good, the concerning, and everything i…” · “Which best describes your family's experience with AI tutoring tools (apps or platforms that use AI to help kids with sc…” · “Overall, how comfortable are you with the idea of your child using an AI tutor to help with schoolwork?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 12 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Education & Academic
AI Upskilling Program Impact & Skill Transfer Survey
Measures whether an AI skills training program actually changed how employees work — confidence gains, specific skill areas, and real on-the-job use — for L&D teams evaluating a completed cohort. The AI follow-up interview digs into what participants actually did differently at work and what's blocking wider adoption.
View templateEducation & Academic
AI Tutor Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes Survey
Measures how effectively an AI tutor supports student comprehension, engagement, and skill growth, for educators and edtech teams evaluating tutoring tools, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a recent tutoring session to surface what helped or confused the student.
View templateEducation & Academic
Student Attitudes Toward AI Writing Tools
An academic research survey examining how college and university students perceive and use AI writing tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and similar technologies. The survey covers usage patterns, perceived benefits and dependency concerns, academic integrity perspectives, quality comparisons, and instructor communication about AI policies.
View templateEducation & Academic
Faculty Perspectives on AI in Grading & Assessment
An academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
View templateEducation & Academic
AI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes
Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.
View templateEducation & Academic
AI Therapist Chatbot Experience and Trust Survey
Measures how people actually use an AI therapist chatbot, how helpful and trustworthy they find it, and whether it has ever felt unsafe or judgmental — for product and clinical safety teams. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific real conversation instead of relying on vague satisfaction ratings.
View template