All templates
Industry-Specific

Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey

Gathers structured peer feedback on a specific colleague's collaboration, reliability, and communication habits, plus a best-worst ranking of their standout strengths. An AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example behind the ratings, so the feedback reads as evidence, not just scores.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

10 questions · ~6 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to give feedback on a colleague. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Be specific and constructive — this helps them grow, and your responses will be shared thoughtfully. About 5 minutes.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

What is your working relationship with this person? (Template note: pair this survey with a single named colleague per send.)

  • Direct peer or teammate
  • Their manager
  • Their direct report
  • Cross-functional partner
Q03
MatrixRequired

Based on your experience working with this person in the last few months, how often do they do each of the following?

5 rows × 4 columns
  • Communicates clearly and proactively
  • Follows through on commitments and deadlines
  • Collaborates well across teams or functions
  • Responds constructively when given feedback
  • Takes initiative on problems outside their core role
Columns: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Almost always
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to want to work with this person again on a future project?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q05
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

From this list, which trait is most and least representative of this person?

  • Clear communication
  • Reliability
  • Technical expertise
  • Collaboration
  • Problem-solving
  • Mentorship
  • Adaptability
  • Initiative
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most representativeWorst:Least representative
Q06
Multiple ChoiceRequired

If this person focused on developing one area, which would have the biggest impact on their effectiveness?

  • Clearer or more frequent communication
  • Following through more consistently
  • Collaborating earlier with other teams
  • Taking more initiative
  • Deeper technical skill
  • Mentoring or supporting others more
Q07
AI InterviewRequired

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent situation where they worked with this person, focusing on what the person did well and what got in the way if anything. If the respondent flagged a growth area above, probe for a concrete example of that gap and what a better version of that moment would have looked like. Avoid letting the answer stay abstract — anchor on one real event, not a general impression.

Q08
Long Text

Anything else about this person's impact on the team you'd like to add?

Q09
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your own role level? (Optional, used only to see if feedback patterns differ by seniority.)

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Senior leader
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
Message

Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Your ratings and comments will be summarized alongside other feedback for this person to support their development conversation.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Combines structured rating questions (matrix of collaboration/reliability/communication habits, opinion scale, best-worst ranking of strengths) with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through one specific, recent example behind their ratings.
  • Turns generic scores into evidence: the AI interview probes for a concrete situation, so reports include real examples rather than just numbers.
  • Includes role-level context (optional) so feedback patterns can be checked against seniority, plus a closing message setting expectations that responses will be summarized for the colleague.
  • Auto-generates a report from the combined rating and interview data, removing manual write-up work for whoever compiles peer feedback.

Jotform

Peer Feedback Forms

A template gallery page offering multiple static peer feedback form layouts that can be customized with Jotform's form builder. Good for quick deployment and integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a fixed-question form rather than an interview-style survey. No mention of follow-up probing or automated scoring of open responses.

What it does well

  • Multiple ready-made form layouts to choose from
  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Can embed in existing workflows/integrations Jotform supports

Where it falls short

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questions to get at specifics behind a rating
  • No automated quality scoring of open-text responses
  • No published methodology for how questions were designed or validated

SurveyMonkey

Workplace Peer Feedback Template

A single ready-to-use peer feedback survey template built for SurveyMonkey's platform, with standard rating and open-text questions. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's reporting dashboards and distribution tools, but the question set is fixed at send-time with no dynamic branching based on individual answers. There's no voice-based or interview component.

What it does well

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics tools
  • Simple, familiar rating-scale question format for respondents
  • Quick to launch as a fielding-ready template

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into specific examples behind ratings
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended answers

Typeform

Peer Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready form template using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UI, which makes it feel more personal than a typical grid form. It still relies on pre-set questions rather than any AI-driven follow-up, and reporting is limited to Typeform's standard results summaries.

What it does well

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Fielding-ready template that's quick to publish
  • Good completion-friendly design for shorter feedback forms

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to probe for concrete examples
  • No automated quality scoring of responses
  • No transparent, published prompt/methodology behind question design

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey” template?

The template includes 10 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to give feedback on a colleague. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymiz…” · “What is your working relationship with this person? (Template note: pair this survey with a single named colleague per s…” · “Based on your experience working with this person in the last few months, how often do they do each of the following?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 10 questions in about 6 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Industry-Specific

Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey

Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.

View template
Industry-Specific

360 Peer Evaluation & Working Relationship Survey

A structured peer-review template for 360-degree feedback cycles — covering core collaboration competencies, an overall effectiveness rating, and a best-worst prioritization of development areas — plus an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the concrete incident behind the rating so feedback isn't just a number. Built for HR, people ops, and team leads running peer review cycles.

View template
Industry-Specific

Group Project Peer Evaluation Survey

Captures how students rate a teammate's contribution, communication, reliability, and work quality on a shared project, plus how they'd split credit across the team. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific behavior behind the rating instead of settling for a vague number, giving instructors evidence to catch free-riders and recognize strong collaborators.

View template
Industry-Specific

Presentation Peer Feedback and Skill-Building Survey

Gathers structured, behavior-specific feedback from colleagues who watched a presentation — covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A — plus a trade-off ranking of what most needs work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that stood out, turning vague 'good job' feedback into a concrete example the presenter can act on.

View template
Industry-Specific

360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review

Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.

View template
Industry-Specific

Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey

Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.

View template