QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
Start free
All templates
Education & Academic

Group Project Peer Evaluation Survey

Captures how students rate a teammate's contribution, communication, reliability, and work quality on a shared project, plus how they'd split credit across the team. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific behavior behind the rating instead of settling for a vague number, giving instructors evidence to catch free-riders and recognize strong collaborators.

Use this templateBrowse more templates

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

10 questions · ~6 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your group project experience. This helps your instructor understand how the team actually worked together, not just the final result. Your individual answers are kept confidential from teammates. About 5 minutes.

Q02
Short TextRequired

Which teammate are you evaluating in this response? Enter their full name.

Q03
MatrixRequired

Thinking about this teammate's work on the project, how much do you agree with each statement?

5 rows × 5 columns
  • Contributed a fair share of the overall workload
  • Communicated clearly and responded to messages promptly
  • Produced work that met the quality the project needed
  • Met deadlines and followed through on commitments
  • Handled disagreements or setbacks constructively
Columns: Strongly Disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly Agree
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how would you rate this teammate's contribution to the final project outcome?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Did not contributeMax:Outstanding contribution
Q05
Point AllocationRequired

Allocate 100 points across everyone on your team, including yourself, based on how much each person actually contributed to the final result. (Template note: replace the placeholder names below with your actual team roster before launching.)

  • Yourself
  • (Replace with teammate 1 name)
  • (Replace with teammate 2 name)
  • (Replace with teammate 3 name)
  • (Replace with teammate 4 name, delete if not needed)
Allocate 100 points
Q06
Multiple Choice

Would you choose to work with this teammate again on a future group project?

  • Yes, definitely
  • Probably
  • Probably not
  • No
Q07
AI Interview

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific moment or task that best illustrates their overall rating of this teammate's contribution. If their point allocation gave this teammate notably fewer or more points than an equal split, probe directly on why. If the rating was high on all statements but the 'work again' answer was lukewarm (or vice versa), surface and resolve that tension with a concrete example.

Q08
Long Text

Name one specific thing this teammate did well, and one thing they could improve on for future group work.

Q09
Multiple Choice

What was your primary role on this team?

  • Team leader / coordinator
  • Core contributor
  • Peripheral or occasional contributor
  • Not sure
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
Message

All done — thank you for your honest feedback. Your instructor will review these responses alongside the final project deliverable, and your individual answers won't be shared directly with teammates.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond a single overall rating by pairing structured questions (agreement matrix, contribution scale, credit-allocation split) with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through one specific moment illustrating the teammate's behavior — turning vague scores into concrete evidence.
  • Includes a constant-sum credit allocation across the whole team, not just the one teammate being rated, so instructors can compare how multiple team members perceive the same distribution of effort.
  • Captures the respondent's own role on the team and asks for one specific strength and one specific improvement area in their own words, giving context for interpreting their ratings.
  • Produces an auto-generated report built from transparent, visible prompts, so instructors can see exactly what was asked and why a follow-up probe was triggered, rather than reviewing raw open-text alone.

Jotform

Student Peer Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-field static form for rating a teammate on standard peer-evaluation criteria, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop builder. It's a solid starting point for basic collection but relies entirely on fixed rating fields with no mechanism to probe further when a rating looks off. Best suited for instructors who just need a simple, quick-to-deploy scorecard.

What it does well

  • Fielding-ready template usable immediately without survey design work
  • Familiar drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's broader form ecosystem
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's existing reporting and data export tools

Where it falls short

  • Static rating fields only — no adaptive follow-up when a response is vague or suggests a free-rider situation
  • No voice-based interview option for richer qualitative context
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Typeform

Student Peer Evaluation Form

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time peer evaluation template that benefits from Typeform's polished respondent experience and higher completion rates. It covers the standard peer-review criteria but, like other form builders, cannot dynamically dig into a specific answer beyond what's pre-scripted. Good for a clean, low-friction survey rather than an investigative one.

What it does well

  • Engaging, mobile-friendly conversational form format known to boost completion
  • Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup
  • Clean visual design consistent with Typeform's brand

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — question flow is fixed regardless of how a respondent answers
  • No voice AI interview mode for capturing spoken detail on teammate behavior
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated evidence report for instructors

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Use this templateStart free

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Education & Academic

Student Perception of Course Quality Survey

Captures how students genuinely experience a course or program — clarity of teaching, fairness, workload, and engagement — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors, program leads, and academic affairs teams who want more than end-of-term star ratings.

View template
Education & Academic

Personal Training Client Intake & Goal Assessment

A new-client intake for personal trainers and coaches that captures training goals, current fitness level, injury/medical history, scheduling needs, and consistency barriers before the first session. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real motivation and biggest obstacle behind the client's stated goal so the trainer can program around it from day one.

View template
Education & Academic

Parent Exit Survey: Understanding School Withdrawals

For K-12 schools that want to understand why families disenroll, this survey captures the stated reason, satisfaction across key factors, and where the child is heading next. An AI follow-up interview digs past the checkbox answer to the real timeline of dissatisfaction and what might have changed the outcome — insight schools can act on to reduce future attrition.

View template
Education & Academic

College Student Retention Risk and Belonging Survey

Measures students' intent to re-enroll, sense of belonging, and satisfaction with academic, financial, and mental-health support, then uses an AI follow-up interview to surface the real story behind low re-enrollment intent or a student weighing whether to leave. Built for student affairs, advising, and retention teams who need to spot risk before it becomes attrition.

View template
Education & Academic

Train-the-Trainer Program Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates whether a train-the-trainer program actually builds facilitation skill and gets used back on the job — covering content relevance, confidence delivering sessions, and skill transfer. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real training session the respondent led afterward, not just their impression of the course.

View template
Education & Academic

Advancement Opportunities and Training Access Survey

Measures how clearly employees understand what it takes to move up, how well current training and development options meet their needs, and what's actually slowing their progress — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real advancement attempt instead of collecting generic complaints about 'lack of opportunity.'

View template