Shared Prompt Library: Discovery & Reuse Experience Survey
Assesses how users find, customize, and derive value from a shared AI prompt library. Use this to identify discovery friction, reuse patterns, and outcome perceptions to prioritize product improvements.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Have you used one or more shared prompts from the library in the past 30 days?
- Yes
- No
In the last 30 days, how often did you use shared prompts from the library?
- Multiple times a day
- About once a day
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- Less than once a week
Where do you usually find shared prompts you try or reuse? Select all that apply.
- In-product gallery or browse
- Search results
- Home page or recommendations
- From teammates or community
- External links or articles
- Templates or starter packs
- Direct share from a colleague
- Other (please specify)
When you reuse a shared prompt, what do you typically do?
- Use it exactly as-is
- Make small edits (minor wording or parameters)
- Heavily customize it for my context
- Use it as inspiration only
- Other (please specify)
Using shared prompts has improved the quality of my AI outputs.
What one or two improvements would most enhance your experience discovering and reusing shared prompts?
Which best describes your primary role?
- Engineering / Developer
- Data / ML
- Product / Design / UX
- Operations / IT
- Marketing / Sales
- Support / Service
- Education / Research
- Other (please specify)
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to the shared prompt library. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.
Approximately how many distinct shared prompts did you reuse in the last 30 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21 or more
How easy or difficult is it to find a suitable shared prompt when you need one?
After finding a useful shared prompt, which of the following do you typically do? Select all that apply.
- Save or favorite it
- Add to a collection or folder
- Copy into my personal library
- Share it with others
- Follow updates or new versions
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Using shared prompts has saved me time compared to writing prompts from scratch.
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your experience with shared prompts in a bit more depth. Please share any additional thoughts about what works well, what frustrates you, or what you'd change—our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
How many people are in your organization?
- 1 (Just me)
- 2–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
Shared prompts in the library are named clearly enough that I can tell what they do.
Of the last 5 new shared prompts you tried, how many did you end up reusing?
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- I haven't tried 5 new prompts yet
Shared prompts have helped me achieve more consistent results across tasks.
Which best describes your organization type?
- Startup
- Small / Medium business
- Enterprise
- Non-profit
- Government
- Education
- Other (please specify)
I can quickly assess whether a shared prompt will produce good results for my task.
Overall, how would you rate the impact of shared prompts on your productivity?
How long have you been using shared prompts?
- Less than 1 month
- 1–3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–2 years
- More than 2 years
The metadata provided (tags, descriptions, examples) helps me evaluate shared prompts before trying them.
Rank the following barriers to finding shared prompts from biggest blocker (top) to smallest (bottom).
- Too many results to sift through
- Search doesn't surface what I need
- Unclear or inconsistent naming
- Low or variable content quality
- Hard to tell if a prompt fits my task
- Lack of metadata (tags, examples)
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Evaluation Fairness & Representation Perceptions Survey for Developers
Measures software developers' perceptions of fairness, bias, and representativeness in their evaluation practices. Ideal for engineering leadership and DEI teams seeking to identify gaps in evaluation methodology and build more inclusive processes.
View templateAI Error Reporting Friction & Trust Impact Survey
Measures how AI users experience error reporting workflows and how unresolved issues affect trust and future reporting intent. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to reduce reporting friction and improve AI reliability perceptions.
View templateAI Error Tolerance & Recovery Experience Survey
Measures user experiences with AI errors, recovery preferences, and resulting trust impact. Designed for AI product teams seeking to prioritize reliability improvements and reduce error-driven churn.
View templateOn-Device AI Training: Consumer Trust & Privacy Perceptions
Measures consumer awareness, trust, privacy concerns, and adoption intentions regarding on-device AI training. Designed for product, UX, and privacy teams seeking to understand how users perceive and evaluate local AI learning features.
View templateData Labeling QA, Bias & Instruction Clarity Audit
An operational audit survey for data labeling teams, measuring instruction clarity, bias mitigation practices, QA rigor, and workflow bottlenecks over the last 30 days. Designed for labelers, reviewers, and QA leads.
View templateAI Changelog Clarity & Adoption Impact Survey
Measures how users perceive the clarity, usefulness, and behavioral impact of AI product changelogs. Designed for product and developer experience teams seeking to optimize release communication and drive feature adoption.
View template