Q01
Message
All templatesEducation & Academic
Student Perceptions of Grading Rubric Quality
Measures student perceptions of rubric clarity, fairness, and usefulness for learning. Designed for course designers and academic researchers seeking to improve grading transparency and rubric design.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
21 questions · ~10 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
Have you received and reviewed a grading rubric for any course assignment this term?
- Yes
- No
Q03
Multiple Choice
What type of course used the rubric you are evaluating?
- STEM lecture
- STEM lab
- Humanities
- Social sciences
- Arts/design
- Business
- Education
- Professional/health
- Other
Q04
Opinion Scale
Overall, how clear was the rubric in communicating what was expected?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all clearMax:Extremely clear
Q05
Ranking
Which of the following improvements to the rubric would be most valuable? Please rank your top three from highest to lowest priority.
- Clearer criterion descriptions
- More examples or sample work at each level
- Explanation of how points are weighted
- Sharing the rubric earlier in the course
- Greater consistency across graders
- More room for creativity or alternative approaches
Drag to rank
Q06
Dropdown
What is your current level of study?
- High school/secondary
- Undergraduate
- Graduate (Master's/Doctoral)
- Professional program (e.g., JD, MD)
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q07
Message
Thank you for sharing your feedback! Your responses will be used to improve rubric design and grading transparency. If you have any questions about this survey, please contact the research team.
Q08
Multiple Choice
What type of assignment used this rubric?
- Paper/essay
- Project or presentation
- Lab report
- Problem set or exam
- Participation/discussion
- Portfolio/studio
- Other
Q09
Opinion Scale
Overall, how fair was the grading you received based on this rubric?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all fairMax:Extremely fair
Q10
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts about how this rubric could be improved.
Q11
Multiple Choice
What is your enrollment status this term?
- Full-time student
- Part-time student
- Not currently enrolled
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice
When did you first receive or access the rubric for this assignment?
- At the start of the course or unit
- With the assignment prompt
- Shortly before the due date
- After submission
- After grading
Q13
Opinion Scale
How useful was the rubric in helping you understand how to improve your work?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q14
AI Interview
We'd like to understand your rubric experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.
Q15
Dropdown
What is your primary field of study?
- Arts & Humanities
- Business
- Education
- Engineering & Computer Science
- Health Professions
- Natural Sciences
- Social Sciences
- Undeclared
- Other
Q16
Opinion Scale
The criteria in the rubric were relevant to the learning objectives of the assignment.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q17
Dropdown
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–20
- 21–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q18
Opinion Scale
The performance levels in the rubric (e.g., excellent, good, needs improvement) were clearly distinguished from one another.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q19
Multiple Choice
What is your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Q20
Opinion Scale
I was able to use the rubric to assess my own work before submitting.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q21
Opinion Scale
The grade I received aligned with how I understood the rubric criteria.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale items isolating rubric clarity, fairness, usefulness for improvement, and criteria-objective alignment — not just general course satisfaction
- Pairs closed-ended rubric ratings with a ranking question on preferred rubric improvements and an open-text reflection, giving both quantifiable and qualitative signal
- Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe student reasoning behind their rubric ratings in depth, something static form builders cannot do
- Captures context (rubric type, assignment type, timing of receipt) and demographics so researchers can segment rubric perceptions by course/field/study level
Jotform
E-learning Student Performance Evaluation Form TemplateA general e-learning performance evaluation form rather than a rubric-specific perception survey; it targets broader student performance/course evaluation rather than isolating rubric clarity, fairness, or usefulness. Useful as a customizable static form but not purpose-built for rubric quality research.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use drag-and-drop form template within a widely used form builder
- Likely supports broad customization of fields and branding for e-learning contexts
- Familiar interface for instructors already using Jotform for course administration
Where it falls short
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe why a rubric felt unclear or unfair
- Not focused on rubric-specific constructs (clarity, fairness, usefulness, criteria-objective alignment)
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
QuestionPro
Course evaluation sample questions and survey templateA course/teacher evaluation template aimed at overall course quality and instructor performance, not specifically at grading rubric perceptions. It's a reasonable adjacent tool for academic researchers but requires significant editing to focus on rubric clarity and fairness. Presented as a sample question set/template rather than a rubric-focused instrument.
What it does well
- Established survey platform with course/teacher evaluation question banks
- Likely offers standard analytics dashboards and reporting for closed-ended responses
- Template designed with academic researchers and course designers in mind
Where it falls short
- No rubric-specific question set covering criteria relevance, performance-level clarity, or self-assessment ability
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to explore student reasoning beyond scaled/multiple-choice answers
- No transparent, published methodology for how any follow-up probing or scoring would work, since none is offered
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Education & Academic
Remote Exam Fairness & Privacy Perceptions Survey
Measures student perceptions of fairness, privacy, and acceptability of proctoring practices in remote exams. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking to evaluate and improve remote assessment policies.
View templateEducation & Academic
Online & Hybrid Learning Student Experience Survey
Measures student engagement, satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and support needs in online and hybrid courses to guide evidence-based program improvements.
View templateEducation & Academic
Pre-Analysis Plan Peer Review Assessment
A structured instrument for expert reviewers to evaluate the clarity, completeness, and pre-specification quality of a pre-analysis plan or preregistration draft before data collection begins.
View templateEducation & Academic
Post-Study Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment
Assesses whether research participants understood key elements of informed consent—study purpose, risks, data handling, and participant rights. Designed for post-study administration to support IRB compliance and iterative improvement of consent materials.
View templateEducation & Academic
Student Perceptions of Certificates & Microcredentials
Measures student awareness, perceived value, enrollment drivers, outcomes, and barriers related to certificates and microcredentials. Designed for higher-education and online-learning researchers seeking actionable segmentation and intent data.
View templateEducation & Academic
Student Internship Support & Learning Outcomes Survey
Measures the quality of institutional internship support, supervision quality, and skill development outcomes to guide program improvement for higher education administrators and career services teams.
View template