All templates
Operations & Data

Supplier ESG Audit Burden & Improvement Survey

Assesses the operational effort, data challenges, and improvement priorities suppliers face during customer-requested ESG audits. Designed for manufacturing and supply chain professionals involved in ESG compliance processes.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

25 questions · ~11 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Supplier ESG Audit Experience Survey. This survey explores the operational effort and challenges your organization faces during customer-requested ESG audits. Your responses will help identify practical improvements to the audit process. • Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest experience. • All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. • Estimated completion time: 6–8 minutes. Please proceed to begin.

Q02
Multiple Choice

In the last 12 months, has your organization completed any customer-requested ESG supplier audits?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
Multiple Choice

What are the main reasons your organization has not completed a customer-requested ESG audit in the last 12 months? (Select all that apply.)

  • Customers have not requested audits
  • Limited internal resources
  • Unclear audit requirements
  • Costs or fees are a concern
  • ESG data not readily available
  • Low perceived value of audits
  • Audit is in progress but not yet completed
  • Other
Q04
Dropdown

Approximately how many customer-requested ESG audits did your organization complete in the last 12 months? (Include on-site, remote, and hybrid.)

  • 1
  • 2–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • More than 10
Q05
Dropdown

Approximately how many internal person-hours did a typical customer ESG audit require from start to finish?

  • Fewer than 10
  • 10–24
  • 25–49
  • 50–99
  • 100–199
  • 200 or more
  • Not sure
Q06
Multiple Choice

Which systems or sources did your organization use to provide ESG data during audits? (Select all that apply.)

  • ERP system
  • EHS/HSE management system
  • Customer supplier portal(s)
  • Spreadsheets
  • Third-party ESG platforms (e.g., EcoVadis, Sedex)
  • Manual/paper records
  • Other
Q07
Opinion Scale

Overall, how valuable are customer-requested ESG audits to your organization?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all valuableMax:Extremely valuable
Q08
Dropdown

Which of the following best describes your primary role?

  • Operations/Plant management
  • Supply chain/Procurement
  • Quality
  • EHS/HSE
  • Sustainability/ESG
  • Compliance/Legal
  • Executive/General management
  • Other
Q09
Message

Thank you for your time and insights. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to help improve future ESG audit requests and processes.

Q10
Multiple Choice

Which audit formats did your organization complete in the last 12 months? (Select all that apply.)

  • On-site assessments
  • Remote/virtual audits
  • Document-only reviews
  • Hybrid (mix of on-site and remote)
  • Other
Q11
Opinion Scale

How burdensome was the preparation and document collection phase of a typical audit?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all burdensomeMax:Extremely burdensome
Q12
Opinion Scale

To what extent did different customers' audit requests overlap in the information or evidence they required?

Scale: 17
Min:No overlap at allMax:Very high overlap
Q13
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to recommend that your organization continue participating in customer ESG audits?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q14
Dropdown

How many employees does your organization have in total?

  • 1–49
  • 50–249
  • 250–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000–9,999
  • 10,000+
Q15
Opinion Scale

How burdensome was the on-site or remote assessment phase of a typical audit?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all burdensomeMax:Extremely burdensome
Q16
Multiple Choice

Which ESG standards or frameworks were most frequently referenced in your customers' audit requests? (Select all that apply.)

  • ISO 14001
  • ISO 45001
  • SA8000
  • SMETA/Sedex
  • RBA Code of Conduct
  • GRI Standards
  • SASB/ISSB
  • CDP
  • Not sure
  • Other
Q17
Ranking

Please rank the following improvements by how much they would reduce your audit burden. (Drag to reorder; top = most helpful.)

  1. Fewer unique questionnaires across customers
  2. Standardized evidence library accepted by multiple customers
  3. Pre-assessment to scope effort in advance
  4. Clear lead times and schedules from customers
  5. Shared acceptance of audit results across customers
  6. Digital integration (APIs/portals) for data submission
Drag to rank
Q18
Dropdown

In which region is your organization's main facility located?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
Q19
Opinion Scale

How burdensome was the corrective action and response phase of a typical audit?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all burdensomeMax:Extremely burdensome
Q20
Long Text

What single change would most improve the ESG audit experience for your team?

Q21
Dropdown

Which manufacturing sector best describes your organization?

  • Automotive
  • Electronics
  • Industrial equipment
  • Chemicals
  • Consumer goods
  • Food & beverage
  • Textiles/Apparel
  • Pharma/Biotech
  • Other
Q22
Opinion Scale

How burdensome was the final reporting and close-out phase of a typical audit?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all burdensomeMax:Extremely burdensome
Q23
AI Interview

Based on your survey responses, please share more about your ESG audit experience. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions.

Q24
Dropdown

How many production sites does your organization operate?

  • 1
  • 2–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • More than 10
Q25
Dropdown

How many years has your organization been involved in supplier audits or ESG reporting?

  • Less than 1
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • More than 10

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes dedicated opinion-scale questions breaking down burden across preparation, on-site assessment, corrective action, and reporting phases of an ESG audit — not just a generic satisfaction score
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview question that adapts to each respondent's prior answers to probe deeper into their specific ESG audit experience
  • Captures structured firmographic and audit-context data (role, employee count, region, manufacturing sector, production sites, years of audit involvement) to segment results
  • Ends with a ranking exercise and open-text question specifically targeting improvement priorities, paired with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report

Jotform

Manufacturing Supply Chain Form Template

This is a generic manufacturing/supply chain form template rather than a survey built around ESG audit burden or improvement priorities. It's fielding-ready as a basic data-collection form but has no ESG-specific question logic, scaled burden breakdowns, or audit-phase structure. Useful as a starting point for supply chain teams but requires heavy customization for ESG audit research.

What it does well

  • Fielding-ready drag-and-drop form builder
  • Manufacturing/supply chain audience fit at a general level
  • Likely supports file uploads and standard form fields common to Jotform templates

Where it falls short

  • No ESG-specific or audit-burden question structure out of the box
  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up probing based on responses
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated analysis/report generation

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Operations & Data

Drone Delivery Consumer Acceptance & Trust Study

Measures consumer trust, noise tolerance, adoption likelihood, and barriers for retail drone delivery. Designed for market researchers evaluating residential readiness for aerial last-mile logistics.

View template
Operations & Data

Internal Data Product SLA Expectations Survey

Captures stakeholder expectations for data product availability, freshness, and quality to inform internal SLO/SLA definitions. Designed for data consumers across engineering, analytics, and business teams.

View template
Operations & Data

Data Literacy & Self-Service Analytics Adoption Assessment

An internal assessment for measuring employees' data literacy, self-service analytics confidence, tool adoption, and support needs — designed to surface skill gaps, trust issues, and barriers that inform data-enablement strategy.

View template
Operations & Data

Data Catalog Governance Health Survey: Findability, Ownership & Trust

Diagnoses catalog discoverability, ownership clarity, and data trust across teams. Designed for internal data practitioners to identify governance gaps and prioritize catalog improvements using NPS and behavioral metrics.

View template
Operations & Data

Construction Safety Wearables Adoption & Impact Survey

Measures adoption rates, usability barriers, perceived safety outcomes, and data trust related to IoT wearables and site sensors among construction workers. Designed for safety managers and operations teams evaluating wearable technology programs on active job sites.

View template
Operations & Data

Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey

Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.

View template