Supplier ESG Audit Burden & Improvement Survey
Assesses the operational effort, data challenges, and improvement priorities suppliers face during customer-requested ESG audits. Designed for manufacturing and supply chain professionals involved in ESG compliance processes.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the last 12 months, has your organization completed any customer-requested ESG supplier audits?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
What are the main reasons your organization has not completed a customer-requested ESG audit in the last 12 months? (Select all that apply.)
- Customers have not requested audits
- Limited internal resources
- Unclear audit requirements
- Costs or fees are a concern
- ESG data not readily available
- Low perceived value of audits
- Audit is in progress but not yet completed
- Other
Approximately how many customer-requested ESG audits did your organization complete in the last 12 months? (Include on-site, remote, and hybrid.)
- 1
- 2–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- More than 10
Approximately how many internal person-hours did a typical customer ESG audit require from start to finish?
- Fewer than 10
- 10–24
- 25–49
- 50–99
- 100–199
- 200 or more
- Not sure
Which systems or sources did your organization use to provide ESG data during audits? (Select all that apply.)
- ERP system
- EHS/HSE management system
- Customer supplier portal(s)
- Spreadsheets
- Third-party ESG platforms (e.g., EcoVadis, Sedex)
- Manual/paper records
- Other
Overall, how valuable are customer-requested ESG audits to your organization?
Which of the following best describes your primary role?
- Operations/Plant management
- Supply chain/Procurement
- Quality
- EHS/HSE
- Sustainability/ESG
- Compliance/Legal
- Executive/General management
- Other
Thank you for your time and insights. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to help improve future ESG audit requests and processes.
Which audit formats did your organization complete in the last 12 months? (Select all that apply.)
- On-site assessments
- Remote/virtual audits
- Document-only reviews
- Hybrid (mix of on-site and remote)
- Other
How burdensome was the preparation and document collection phase of a typical audit?
To what extent did different customers' audit requests overlap in the information or evidence they required?
How likely are you to recommend that your organization continue participating in customer ESG audits?
How many employees does your organization have in total?
- 1–49
- 50–249
- 250–999
- 1,000–4,999
- 5,000–9,999
- 10,000+
How burdensome was the on-site or remote assessment phase of a typical audit?
Which ESG standards or frameworks were most frequently referenced in your customers' audit requests? (Select all that apply.)
- ISO 14001
- ISO 45001
- SA8000
- SMETA/Sedex
- RBA Code of Conduct
- GRI Standards
- SASB/ISSB
- CDP
- Not sure
- Other
Please rank the following improvements by how much they would reduce your audit burden. (Drag to reorder; top = most helpful.)
- Fewer unique questionnaires across customers
- Standardized evidence library accepted by multiple customers
- Pre-assessment to scope effort in advance
- Clear lead times and schedules from customers
- Shared acceptance of audit results across customers
- Digital integration (APIs/portals) for data submission
In which region is your organization's main facility located?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
How burdensome was the corrective action and response phase of a typical audit?
What single change would most improve the ESG audit experience for your team?
Which manufacturing sector best describes your organization?
- Automotive
- Electronics
- Industrial equipment
- Chemicals
- Consumer goods
- Food & beverage
- Textiles/Apparel
- Pharma/Biotech
- Other
How burdensome was the final reporting and close-out phase of a typical audit?
Based on your survey responses, please share more about your ESG audit experience. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions.
How many production sites does your organization operate?
- 1
- 2–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- More than 10
How many years has your organization been involved in supplier audits or ESG reporting?
- Less than 1
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale questions breaking down burden across preparation, on-site assessment, corrective action, and reporting phases of an ESG audit — not just a generic satisfaction score
- Uses an AI follow-up interview question that adapts to each respondent's prior answers to probe deeper into their specific ESG audit experience
- Captures structured firmographic and audit-context data (role, employee count, region, manufacturing sector, production sites, years of audit involvement) to segment results
- Ends with a ranking exercise and open-text question specifically targeting improvement priorities, paired with automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report
Jotform
Manufacturing Supply Chain Form TemplateThis is a generic manufacturing/supply chain form template rather than a survey built around ESG audit burden or improvement priorities. It's fielding-ready as a basic data-collection form but has no ESG-specific question logic, scaled burden breakdowns, or audit-phase structure. Useful as a starting point for supply chain teams but requires heavy customization for ESG audit research.
What it does well
- Fielding-ready drag-and-drop form builder
- Manufacturing/supply chain audience fit at a general level
- Likely supports file uploads and standard form fields common to Jotform templates
Where it falls short
- No ESG-specific or audit-burden question structure out of the box
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up probing based on responses
- No per-response quality scoring or automated analysis/report generation
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Drone Delivery Consumer Acceptance & Trust Study
Measures consumer trust, noise tolerance, adoption likelihood, and barriers for retail drone delivery. Designed for market researchers evaluating residential readiness for aerial last-mile logistics.
View templateInternal Data Product SLA Expectations Survey
Captures stakeholder expectations for data product availability, freshness, and quality to inform internal SLO/SLA definitions. Designed for data consumers across engineering, analytics, and business teams.
View templateData Literacy & Self-Service Analytics Adoption Assessment
An internal assessment for measuring employees' data literacy, self-service analytics confidence, tool adoption, and support needs — designed to surface skill gaps, trust issues, and barriers that inform data-enablement strategy.
View templateData Catalog Governance Health Survey: Findability, Ownership & Trust
Diagnoses catalog discoverability, ownership clarity, and data trust across teams. Designed for internal data practitioners to identify governance gaps and prioritize catalog improvements using NPS and behavioral metrics.
View templateConstruction Safety Wearables Adoption & Impact Survey
Measures adoption rates, usability barriers, perceived safety outcomes, and data trust related to IoT wearables and site sensors among construction workers. Designed for safety managers and operations teams evaluating wearable technology programs on active job sites.
View templateMeeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey
Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.
View template