Q01
Message
All templatesProduct & UX
Unmoderated Usability Test with Screen Share & Voice
A self-serve usability session: participants share their screen, complete guided tasks on your website or prototype while thinking aloud, and the AI moderator watches, prompts, and probes — then debriefs them. You get recordings, transcripts, and task-level analysis without scheduling a single session.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
7 questions · ~10 min
Q02
ConsentRequired
Before we start, please review and confirm.
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired
How familiar are you with our product?
- I use it regularly
- I've tried it once or twice
- This is my first time seeing it
Q04
Voice AI Interview
Moderated task session
Moderate a think-aloud usability session. For each task: read the task aloud, then stay quiet while the participant works — prompt only if they go silent for a while ('What are you thinking right now?', 'What did you exp…
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how easy or difficult was it to complete the tasks?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q06
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely would you be to use this product for real, based on what you just experienced?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q07
Message
Thank you — that was genuinely helpful. Your recording and reasoning go straight to the team who can fix what you struggled with.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Guided tasks with screen share and recording, moderated by an AI that prompts think-aloud, never leads, and debriefs at the end — no scheduling, no moderator hours
- Recording consent is built into the flow, and every session produces a transcript plus task-level analysis
- Standard measures included (SEQ-style ease rating, adoption likelihood) so results benchmark across rounds
- The moderator asks the question human moderators forget under time pressure: 'what did you expect that to do?'
Maze
Usability Testing Template (Testing a New Product)A structured unmoderated usability template that mixes screening, scenario-based tasks, expectation-validation, and open-ended wrap-up, backed by automatic behavioral metrics (bounce rates, misclicks, heatmaps) and reporting within hours. Very strong on quantitative interaction capture, but follow-up questions are pre-scripted rather than adaptive to what a participant just did.
What it does well
- Scenario/task framing ('imagine you were trying to accomplish X') that produces realistic task-based testing
- Combines expectation-validation questions with open-ended wrap-up for qualitative signal
- Automatic behavioral metrics: bounce rates, misclicks, heatmaps, and a usability score for prototype navigation
- Automated reporting delivered within hours, lowering analyst effort
Where it falls short
- Follow-up questions are fixed in the flow; there is no AI probing when a participant struggles or gives a surprising answer
- Unmoderated by design means no live voice interviewer to ask 'why did you do that?' in the moment
- Screen interaction is captured as heatmaps/misclicks, not a full guided-task screen-share recording with narration
- Insights are metric-driven; less emphasis on a synthesized qualitative narrative per participant
Maze
11 Usability Testing Templates for Building Great ProductsA library of 11 purpose-specific usability templates spanning planning, prototype testing, mobile, feature discoverability, sign-up flow, and standardized instruments (SUS, SEQ) plus a reporting template. Excellent breadth and inclusion of validated metrics, but each is a self-serve question/task form with no adaptive interviewer or voice component.
What it does well
- Broad coverage: plan, early-prototype, new-product, mobile, feature-discoverability, sign-up-flow, and feedback templates in one library
- Includes validated quantitative instruments (System Usability Scale, Single Ease Question) for benchmarkable scores
- Ships a matching usability-testing report template so findings roll straight into a stakeholder deliverable
- Metrics baked in: task completion, misclicks, time-on-task, difficulty ratings
Where it falls short
- Templates are static task/question sets, so they cannot ask an adaptive AI follow-up when a task fails
- No voice-AI interview mode to capture think-aloud reasoning conversationally
- No guided-task screen-share + recording flow; behavioral signal is limited to click/heatmap metrics
- Report template is a manual fill-in rather than an auto-written report generated from the session data
SurveySparrow
Website Usability Survey TemplateA website usability feedback survey in chat format — good for scaled self-reported usability sentiment. It asks users what they think of the site; it cannot watch them actually use it.
What it does well
- Quick way to collect usability sentiment from real visitors at scale
- Conversational format keeps completion rates healthy
- Recurring runs support tracking scores across releases
Where it falls short
- Self-report only — no screen share, no task observation, no recordings
- No think-aloud moderation or expectation probing at the moment of confusion
- No task-level success metrics, just opinions after the fact
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Product & UX
System Usability Scale (SUS) with AI Debrief
The standard 10-item SUS questionnaire, scored 0–100 and benchmarkable against decades of published research — with correct alternating positive/negative wording preserved. An AI debrief interview follows the score, so you learn what to fix, not just where you stand.
View templateProduct & UX
Importance vs. Satisfaction Gap Analysis
Find your biggest opportunities by measuring the same attributes twice — how much each matters, and how well you deliver it today. The gaps become your priority list, and slider matrices keep it fast enough that people actually finish. AI follow-ups dig into the biggest gap each respondent reports.
View templateProduct & UX
First-Click Test: Findability & Visual Priority
Where do people click first when given a task on your design? First-click success is one of the strongest predictors of task completion. Upload your screenshot, set the task, and let the AI interviewer ask what they expected to happen — turning a click map into a usability diagnosis.
View templateProduct & UX
MaxDiff Feature Prioritization Survey
Force real trade-offs with best-worst scaling: respondents pick the most and least valuable feature in rotating sets, then an AI interviewer probes the reasoning behind their top pick. Produces a true preference ranking instead of everything-is-important rating inflation.
View templateProduct & UX
UAT Plan Clarity & Feedback Loop Effectiveness Survey
Assesses User Acceptance Testing plan quality, feedback loop efficiency, and release confidence from the perspective of UAT participants. Designed for QA, product, and engineering teams seeking to diagnose process gaps and prioritize improvements.
View templateProduct & UX
Site Search UX Evaluation: Intent, Relevance & Filtering
Evaluates users' search experiences across intent expression, result relevance, and filter/sort usability to identify actionable improvements for product search, UX, and conversions.
View template