All templates
Strategy & Transformation

Workday Time Audit: Meetings, Interruptions & Deep Focus

Measures employee meeting load, interruption frequency and recovery cost, and deep-focus availability to identify productivity blockers and inform schedule optimization.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

19 questions · ~9 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Workday Time Audit Survey. This survey takes approximately 9 minutes and asks about your recent experience with meetings, interruptions, and focus time. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate — no individual answers will be shared with managers or leadership. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we simply want your honest perspective. Please answer based on your experience over the past 1–2 weeks.

Q02
Dropdown

In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many hours did you spend in scheduled meetings?

  • 0 hours
  • 1–3 hours
  • 4–6 hours
  • 7–10 hours
  • 11–15 hours
  • 16–20 hours
  • 21–25 hours
  • More than 25 hours
Q03
Dropdown

On a typical workday in the past week, approximately how many times was your focus interrupted (e.g., messages, drop-ins, unscheduled calls)?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–15
  • 16–20
  • More than 20
Q04
Dropdown

In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many hours did you have for uninterrupted deep work (blocks of 30+ minutes)?

  • 0 hours
  • 1–3 hours
  • 4–6 hours
  • 7–10 hours
  • 11–15 hours
  • 16–20 hours
  • More than 20 hours
Q05
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional context that would help us understand your experience (e.g., peak meeting days, common interruption sources, tools that help or hinder focus).

Q06
Dropdown

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months – 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q07
Message

Thank you for completing this survey — your input helps us identify ways to protect focus time and improve how we work together.

Q08
Dropdown

In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many scheduled meetings did you attend?

  • 0
  • 1–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11–15
  • 16–20
  • 21–25
  • More than 25
Q09
Dropdown

After a typical interruption, approximately how many minutes does it take you to regain full focus?

  • Less than 1 minute
  • 1–2 minutes
  • 3–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • 11–15 minutes
  • 16–20 minutes
  • More than 20 minutes
Q10
Opinion Scale

Over the past two weeks, how sufficient has your uninterrupted focus time been for completing your core work?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all sufficientMax:Completely sufficient
Q11
AI Interview

We'd like to learn more about your workday experience. An AI moderator will ask 1–2 brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q12
Dropdown

Which of the following best describes your role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead / Supervisor
  • Manager
  • Senior manager / Director
  • VP / Executive
  • Other
Q13
Opinion Scale

Overall, how would you describe your meeting load over the past two weeks?

Scale: 17
Min:Very lightMax:Very heavy
Q14
Opinion Scale

How disruptive are interruptions to your ability to complete your core work?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all disruptiveMax:Extremely disruptive
Q15
Multiple Choice

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • Fully on-site
  • Hybrid (mix of on-site and remote)
  • Fully remote
Q16
Opinion Scale

Over the past two weeks, most meetings I attended had a clear agenda or purpose.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q17
Opinion Scale

Over the past two weeks, my presence was necessary in most meetings I attended.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q18
Opinion Scale

Over the past two weeks, most meetings I attended ended with clear next steps or decisions.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q19
Opinion Scale

Over the past two weeks, many of the meetings I attended could have been handled via email or a shared document.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “Workday Time Audit: Meetings, Interruptions & Deep Focus” template?

The template includes 19 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the Workday Time Audit Survey. This survey takes approximately 9 minutes and asks about your recent experienc…” · “In the past week (5 working days), approximately how many hours did you spend in scheduled meetings?” · “On a typical workday in the past week, approximately how many times was your focus interrupted (e.g., messages, drop-ins…”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 19 questions in about 9 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Strategy & Transformation

Manager 1:1 Quality & Cadence Survey

Measures the frequency, coaching quality, and follow-through of manager 1:1 meetings. Designed for HR and people operations teams seeking to identify gaps and improve manager effectiveness across teams.

View template
Strategy & Transformation

Meeting Availability & Scheduling Preferences Survey

Maps when employees are genuinely available and willing to meet, how their meeting time actually breaks down, and where scheduling friction eats into focus work. An AI follow-up interview digs into one specific recent meeting that went wrong and what would have fixed it. Built for ops, IT, and people teams auditing meeting culture.

View template
Strategy & Transformation

Meeting Effectiveness & Culture Pulse Survey

Measures how employees actually experience the meetings on their calendar — frequency, agenda discipline, time well spent, and what they'd fix first — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific meeting that felt like a waste of time and what would have made it worth attending.

View template
Strategy & Transformation

Meeting Planning Tool Experience & Pain Points

Measures how people actually schedule, reschedule, and coordinate meetings today — time spent, satisfaction with current tools, and which features would save the most time. Built for product and operations teams evaluating or building meeting planning software. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent scheduling breakdown instead of relying on a generic satisfaction score.

View template
Strategy & Transformation

Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey

Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.

View template
Strategy & Transformation

Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll

Finds the best date, time, and format for an upcoming meeting or event by checking real availability against a shortlist of options — for anyone coordinating a group across busy calendars. The AI follow-up digs into the scheduling conflicts and recurring constraints that a simple poll misses, so organizers don't pick a slot that quietly excludes key people.

View template