Employee & HR

30-Day New Hire Onboarding Experience Survey

Captures how a new employee's first 30 days actually went — role clarity, manager support, tools access, and team integration — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment onboarding fell short. Built for HR and people teams who want to fix onboarding before new hires disengage or leave.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Welcome back! It's been about 30 days since you joined — we'd love to hear how onboarding actually went for you. Your honest feedback shapes what new hires experience next. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5 minutes.

Q02

의견 척도필수

Thinking about your role today, how clear are you on what's expected of you day to day?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not clear at all최대:Completely clear

Q03

매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your first 30 days?

5개 행 × 5개 열

I received a clear 30/60/90-day plan for my role
My manager was accessible when I had questions
I had the equipment and system access I needed on day one
I understood how my role contributes to the team's goals
I felt welcomed by my team

열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree

Q04

객관식필수

In your first 30 days, how many one-on-one check-ins did you have with your manager?

None
One
Two to three
Four to six
More than six

Q05

평점 척도필수

How would you rate the support you got from your manager during onboarding?

범위: 1 – 5

최소:Poor최대:Excellent

Q06

객관식필수

Do you currently have the tools and resources you need to do your job effectively?

Yes, fully
Mostly, a few gaps remain
Somewhat, several gaps remain
No, I'm missing key tools or access

Q07

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

If you could change one thing about onboarding, which of these would make the biggest difference — and which would matter least?

Clearer role expectations and goals
Faster IT and equipment setup
More structured training schedule
More frequent manager check-ins
Better introductions to teammates
Clearer 30-60-90 day milestones
Smoother HR paperwork and benefits enrollment

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would improve onboarding the most최악:Would improve onboarding the least

Q08

의견 척도필수

Based on your first 30 days, how likely are you to recommend this company as a great place to work?

척도: 0 – 10

최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely

Q09

AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through the single moment in their first 30 days where onboarding felt most confusing, unsupported, or frustrating — get specifics on what happened, who was involved, and what they wish had happened instead. If they rated manager support or role clarity low, anchor there; if everything scored well, probe what almost went wrong or could break for the next new hire. Close by asking what one change would have made the biggest difference.

Q10

메시지

That's everything we need — thank you for the honest feedback! Your answers feed directly into how we redesign onboarding for future new hires, and HR will follow up on any specific gaps you flagged.

Q11

객관식

Which department are you part of?

Engineering
Sales
Marketing
Customer Support
Operations
Finance
People/HR
Other
Prefer not to say

Q12

객관식

What is your primary work arrangement?

Fully remote
Hybrid
Fully on-site
Prefer not to say

Q13

객관식

Which best describes your employment type?

Full-time
Part-time
Contract
Intern
Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Goes beyond static rating questions with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through the specific moment onboarding fell short, surfacing root causes a fixed-question survey can't reach.
Combines quantitative pulse checks (role clarity opinion scale, manager support rating, a matrix of agreement statements, max-diff prioritization) with open-ended probing in one flow.
Segments results automatically by department, work arrangement, and employment type, so HR can see whether onboarding gaps cluster in specific teams or hiring types.
Every response is automatically scored for quality and rolled into an auto-generated report, so HR teams get a synthesized read on onboarding health without manually reading transcripts.

Jotform

New Hire Onboarding Status Control Form Template

This is an internal HR/admin tracking form for monitoring onboarding task completion (paperwork, equipment, access), not a survey designed to capture the new hire's own experience. Useful for process control, but it doesn't ask employees how onboarding felt or where it fell short. Best viewed as a checklist template rather than a fielding-ready experience survey.

잘하는 점

Purpose-built for tracking onboarding task/status completion
Fits Jotform's broader form-builder and workflow ecosystem

아쉬운 점

Not designed to capture employee sentiment, role clarity, or manager support
Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up questioning
No mechanism for probing a specific negative moment in the onboarding journey

SurveyMonkey

Onboarding Survey Template with Ready-to-Send Questions

A ready-to-send, fixed-question onboarding survey template aimed at gauging general new hire satisfaction. It's a genuine fielding-ready survey, backed by SurveyMonkey's established distribution and analytics tools, but the question set is static rather than adaptive.

잘하는 점

Ready-to-send template with an established survey distribution platform
Backed by broad benchmarking and analytics tooling

아쉬운 점

Fixed question list with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific bad moment
No per-response quality scoring or automated qualitative synthesis
No transparent prompt/methodology disclosure since there's no AI interviewing layer

SurveySparrow

Onboarding Experience Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style feedback form focused on onboarding experience, in keeping with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It captures structured feedback well but appears to be a fixed-flow form rather than one with true adaptive interviewing based on each answer.

잘하는 점

Conversational, chat-style UI that feels more human than a typical form
Focused specifically on onboarding experience feedback

아쉬운 점

Chat-style presentation is scripted, not adaptive AI follow-up probing per response
No automated quality scoring of individual answers
No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks

Typeform

New Hire Onboarding Form Template

A polished, conversational-style form template well suited to collecting general new hire information and feedback, leveraging Typeform's known design strengths. It's a fixed sequence of questions rather than a survey that adapts based on what a respondent says.

잘하는 점

Clean, engaging conversational form design
Easy to build and customize within Typeform's ecosystem

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore a respondent's specific onboarding pain point
No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report synthesis
No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task capability

자주 묻는 질문