AI Therapist Chatbot Experience and Trust Survey
Measures how people actually use an AI therapist chatbot, how helpful and trustworthy they find it, and whether it has ever felt unsafe or judgmental — for product and clinical safety teams. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific real conversation instead of relying on vague satisfaction ratings.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 30 days, how often have you used this chatbot?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- A few times this past month
- This is my first time using it
What do you typically use the chatbot for? Select all that apply.
- General stress relief
- Managing anxiety
- Coping with depression or low mood
- Working through a specific problem or decision
- Loneliness or wanting someone to talk to
- Filling the gap between human therapy sessions
- Crisis or urgent emotional support
- Just curious or testing it out
How much do you agree with each statement about your experience with the chatbot?
- It understood what I was trying to say
- I felt judged by its responses
- I trust its suggestions almost as much as advice from a person
- I feel comfortable sharing sensitive or embarrassing topics with it
- I would recommend it to someone who is struggling emotionally
Overall, how helpful has (Replace with your chatbot's name) been in helping you cope with what you're going through?
Which of these matter most to you when you choose to talk to the chatbot instead of a person?
- Available 24/7
- No cost or low cost
- Anonymity and privacy
- Non-judgmental tone
- Immediate response, no waiting
- Personalized suggestions
- No appointment or waiting list needed
- Feels like talking to a real therapist
Has the chatbot ever given you a response that felt unsafe, inappropriate, or unhelpful for what you were going through?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
How likely are you to recommend this chatbot to someone else facing similar struggles?
If the respondent flagged a response that felt unsafe, inappropriate, or unhelpful, reconstruct exactly what they typed, what the chatbot said back, and what they did next — ignored it, sought a human, kept using the app, or stopped. If they didn't flag one, probe the single most meaningful conversation they've had with the chatbot: what they were going through, what it said that landed or fell flat, and what a human therapist might have done differently in that same moment. Push past generic 'it helped' or 'it's fine' answers for concrete detail.
If a human therapist were just as affordable and available as this chatbot, what would you do?
- Switch to a human therapist
- Keep using the chatbot instead
- Use both
- Not sure
What's your relationship to human therapy right now?
- Currently seeing a human therapist
- Have seen one in the past, but not currently
- Never seen a human therapist
- Prefer not to say
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing this with us — especially anything that felt uncomfortable to admit. Your answers will be used to make the chatbot safer and more genuinely helpful, and any flagged safety concerns will be reviewed by our clinical team.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Reconstructs a specific real conversation the respondent had with the chatbot via an AI follow-up interview, rather than asking them to rate 'satisfaction' in the abstract
- Directly asks whether the chatbot ever felt unsafe, inappropriate, or judgmental, and routes flagged respondents into a deeper AI-driven follow-up on that exact incident — built for clinical safety review, not just product feedback
- Combines usage frequency, use-case selection, a matrix of trust/agreement statements, and a max-diff on why people choose the bot over a human, giving product and clinical teams multiple angles in one instrument
- Closes with context on the respondent's relationship to human therapy, so 'would you recommend this over a therapist' answers can be interpreted correctly
SurveySparrow
Therapist Chatbot | Template for CounsellorsThis is a static, fielding-ready survey template aimed at counsellors gathering feedback on a therapist chatbot, so it's a genuine topical match. It appears built around fixed question sets rather than reconstructing individual conversations, and is framed more generally for counsellor use than specifically for product/clinical safety teams flagging unsafe responses.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built specifically for therapist chatbot feedback, giving it direct topical relevance
- Framed for counsellors, suggesting language and question framing suited to a therapeutic context
- Likely quick to deploy given SurveySparrow's template-driven form builder
아쉬운 점
- No indication of adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents who flag an unsafe or unhelpful moment likely can't be probed further on that specific exchange
- No visible mechanism for reconstructing what actually happened in a specific conversation, relying instead on standard rating-style questions
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how any AI-assisted elements (if present) generate or score responses
자주 묻는 질문
“AI Therapist Chatbot Experience and Trust Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 13개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Hi! We're trying to understand how people actually experience (Replace with your chatbot's name) — the good, the unhelpf…” · “In the last 30 days, how often have you used this chatbot?” · “What do you typically use the chatbot for? Select all that apply.”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 13개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Patient Waiting List Experience Survey
Captures how patients experience the wait between referral and treatment — expectations vs. reality, communication quality, anxiety, and health impact — for clinics and health systems managing waiting lists. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment communication broke down or worked well, surfacing fixes that satisfaction scores alone can't show.
템플릿 보기AI Chatbot Effectiveness in Student Advising & Support
This survey evaluates student experiences with AI chatbot advising and support services. It measures usage patterns, task types, perceived success rates, satisfaction, trust, comparison to human advisors, and areas for improvement.
템플릿 보기Doctor Appointment Chatbot Experience Survey
Measures how well an AI scheduling chatbot helps patients book, reschedule, or get answers about medical appointments, covering task completion, trust, and friction points — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment the chatbot helped or failed.
템플릿 보기Flight Booking Chatbot Usability & Trust Survey
Evaluates how well an airline or travel site's AI chatbot handles real booking, change, and support tasks — covering task completion, trust, and where users bail out to a human. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened in the respondent's most recent chatbot session, not just how they'd rate it in hindsight.
템플릿 보기Marketing Chatbot Experience & Effectiveness Survey
Measures how well your website or marketing chatbot resolves visitor questions, builds trust, and moves people toward a purchase or signup. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the respondent's most recent chatbot conversation in detail, surfacing exactly where it helped or broke down. Built for marketing and CX teams evaluating a live chatbot deployment.
템플릿 보기엔터테인먼트 챗봇 참여도 및 만족도 설문조사
사람들이 엔터테인먼트 챗봇(친구 역할, 롤플레이, 유머, 스토리텔링)을 얼마나 자주 사용하는지, 무엇이 재방문을 유도하는지, 그리고 경험이 어디에서 기대에 못 미치는지를 측정합니다. 또한 AI 후속 질문을 통해 기억에 남는 특정 대화를 재구성하여 실제로 무엇이 재미있고, 그럴듯하며, 혹은 실망스러웠는지를 드러냅니다. 캐릭터 또는 엔터테인먼트 중심의 AI 경험을 출시하는 제품 및 콘텐츠 팀을 위해 제작되었습니다.
템플릿 보기