모든 템플릿
Strategy & Transformation

Annual Planning Priorities, Risks, and Bold Bets Survey

Collects input from every level of the organization on top priorities, resourcing tradeoffs, biggest risks, and the bold bets people would make for next year. An AI follow-up presses into the reasoning, blockers, and resources behind each person's proposed bet, so planning starts with real signal instead of guesses.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for weighing in on next year's plan. Your priorities, concerns, and ideas genuinely shape what leadership decides to fund. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 6-8 minutes.

Q02
순위 매기기필수

Rank these potential company priorities for next year from most to least important, in your view.

  1. (Replace with Priority A - e.g., Expand into new markets)
  2. (Replace with Priority B - e.g., Improve product reliability)
  3. (Replace with Priority C - e.g., Grow enterprise sales)
  4. (Replace with Priority D - e.g., Invest in AI capabilities)
  5. (Replace with Priority E - e.g., Strengthen operational efficiency) (Template note: swap in your own draft priorities before launching.)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q03
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

From this list of potential bets for next year, which would create the most value for the business, and which the least?

  • (Replace with new product/feature bet)
  • (Replace with new market or segment bet)
  • Invest heavily in AI or automation tooling
  • Increase headcount in customer-facing teams
  • Sunset or consolidate an underperforming product line
  • (Replace with a key partnership or channel bet)
  • Redesign the core product experience
  • Build out data and analytics infrastructure
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Highest-value bet최악:Lowest-value bet
Q04
점수 배분필수

If you had 100 points to allocate across these areas for next year's investment, how would you split them?

  • Product development
  • Sales & marketing
  • Customer support/success
  • Operations & infrastructure
  • People, culture & hiring
  • Research & innovation
100점 배분
Q05
의견 척도필수

Right now, how confident are you that your team has what it needs to hit an ambitious goal next year?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q06
매트릭스필수

For each area, how much of a risk do you see for the business over the next 12 months?

6개 행 × 4개 열
  • Talent and retention risk
  • Competitive risk
  • Macroeconomic/market risk
  • Technology or security risk
  • Execution and operational risk
  • 외 1개
: Low risk · Moderate risk · High risk · Severe risk
Q07
객관식필수

What is the single biggest constraint limiting your team's ability to execute well next year?

  • Headcount or staffing
  • Budget
  • Tooling or technology
  • Cross-team dependencies or support
  • Unclear priorities or leadership direction
Q08
장문형

If you could make one bold bet for the organization next year — something bigger than business as usual — what would it be and why?

Q09
AI 인터뷰

Dig into the respondent's bold bet: what would concretely change day-to-day, what resources, budget, or permission it would require, and what has stopped the organization from doing it already. If they flagged any risk area as 'Severe', ask what a leading indicator of that risk showing up would look like and what mitigation they'd prioritize first. If their bold bet was vague, push for a specific first step someone could take within 90 days.

Q10
메시지

Almost done — just a couple of quick optional questions about your role, so we can see how priorities differ across the organization.

Q11
객관식

Which area of the business do you primarily work in?

  • Product
  • Engineering
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer success/support
  • Operations
  • People/HR
  • Finance
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which best describes your level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Director/senior manager
  • VP/executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for the input! Your priorities, risk read, and bold bet feed directly into the planning discussion — leadership will see aggregated results before final decisions are made.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs a open-text bold-bet prompt with a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that digs into what would concretely change day-to-day, blockers, and resources needed — turning a one-line idea into real signal instead of a guess.
  • Uses ranking, best-worst trade-off, and point-allocation (100-point allocation) together so leadership gets forced trade-offs on priorities and investment, not just unranked opinions.
  • Includes a matrix question rating risk across multiple business areas over the next 12 months plus a multiple-choice constraint question, giving a structured risk-and-blocker map alongside the qualitative bets.
  • Closes with optional role/level segmentation (area of business, level) so priorities, risk reads, and bold bets can be cut by who is saying them, without forcing identification up front.

Jotform

Capacity Planning Checklist Form Template

This is a static checklist form focused narrowly on tracking capacity/resource items, not a survey designed to collect organization-wide input on strategic priorities, risks, and bold bets. It's fielding-ready as a form but scoped to operational capacity tracking rather than annual planning strategy. Useful for ops teams doing resource checklists, but not a direct substitute for a cross-level planning-input survey.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Simple, structured checklist format that's easy for respondents to complete fast
  • Backed by Jotform's broad template library and integrations

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — it's a fixed checklist, so there's no way to probe reasoning, blockers, or resourcing behind any answer
  • No prioritization methodology like ranking, max-diff, or constant-sum allocation for trading off competing priorities
  • No cross-level role/level segmentation or automated per-response quality scoring, and no publicly stated methodology behind the checklist's structure

자주 묻는 질문

“Annual Planning Priorities, Risks, and Bold Bets Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 13개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Thanks for weighing in on next year's plan. Your priorities, concerns, and ideas genuinely shape what leadership decides…” · “Rank these potential company priorities for next year from most to least important, in your view.” · “From this list of potential bets for next year, which would create the most value for the business, and which the least?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 13개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Digital Transformation Readiness & Change Fatigue Survey

Assesses how ready employees are for digital transformation across tool adoption willingness, skill confidence, process pain points, and change fatigue. Built for operations, IT, and transformation leaders sequencing a rollout. An AI follow-up digs into the specific reason behind hesitation or exhaustion that scale scores alone can't explain.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Strategic Plan Clarity, Alignment, and Execution Survey

Gauges whether employees or leaders understand the organization's strategic priorities, believe resources and daily work are aligned to them, and feel confident execution will succeed — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real barriers behind low-confidence or low-alignment answers.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Leadership Alignment on AI Strategy Pulse Check

A short pulse check for executive and senior leadership teams that surfaces where AI strategy is genuinely shared versus quietly contested — covering clarity, priorities, budget trade-offs, and adoption stage. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision or disagreement behind the lowest-rated alignment statement instead of settling for a vague 'somewhat aligned' score.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Budget Allocation & Priority Trade-Off Survey

Give stakeholders 100 points and make them spend it: constant-sum allocation across initiatives forces the prioritization that agree-scale surveys hide. Follow-up questions capture what they'd cut entirely, and the AI interviewer pressure-tests their biggest bet.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Personal Life Goals & Priorities Assessment

Explores what people are actually working toward in life — which domains they're prioritizing, how they allocate time and energy, and how confident they feel about progress. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind their single most important goal: why it matters and what's really standing in the way. Built for coaches, researchers, and wellbeing programs benchmarking goal-setting behavior.

템플릿 보기
Strategy & Transformation

Marketing Plan Readiness & Confidence Checklist

A self-assessment for marketers, founders, and agency teams to check how complete, resourced, and confidence-inspiring their current marketing plan actually is — covering goals, audience, budget, channels, and measurement. The AI follow-up interview digs into whichever plan component the respondent flags as weakest, uncovering the real blocker instead of a generic 'needs work' answer.

템플릿 보기