Electronics Retailer Shopping Experience Survey
Evaluates how customers research, compare, and buy consumer electronics from your store — covering website usability, price perception, and trust in shipping/support — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the real decision journey behind their most recent purchase. Built for e-commerce and electronics retail teams optimizing conversion and retention.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
What type of electronic product did you most recently purchase from us?
- Laptop or computer
- Smartphone or tablet
- TV or home theater
- Audio (headphones, speakers)
- Smart home device
- Gaming hardware
- Other
Where did you research this product before buying it here?
- Our website or app
- Search engines
- Manufacturer's website
- Review sites (e.g., CNET, RTINGS)
- Social media or influencer content
- In-store browsing at another retailer
- Friends or family recommendation
Thinking about your most recent purchase, how well did each part of the experience go?
- Finding the product you wanted
- Comparing specs or models
- Checkout process
- Shipping speed
- Product arrived as described
- 외 1개
How likely are you to recommend this retailer to a friend shopping for electronics?
Thinking about (Replace with product category, e.g., 'wireless noise-cancelling headphones') from a retailer like ours, please answer honestly:
- At what price would you consider this product so cheap that you'd question its quality?
- At what price would you consider this product a bargain — a great buy for the money?
- At what price would you consider this product starting to feel expensive, though you'd still consider buying it?
- At what price would you consider this product too expensive to consider buying?
When choosing where to buy electronics online, which of these factors matter most to you, and which matter least?
- Lowest price
- Fast, free shipping
- Easy returns policy
- Detailed product specs and comparisons
- Customer reviews and ratings
- Live chat or phone support
- Wide selection of brands
- Loyalty or rewards program
Reconstruct the respondent's actual decision path for their most recent electronics purchase: what almost stopped them from buying (price, uncertainty about specs, shipping time, trust), what tipped them into completing checkout, and whether they compared us against another retailer along the way. If they rated shipping or support poorly in the earlier ratings, probe exactly what went wrong and what resolution they expected.
How likely are you to buy your next electronics purchase from us again?
- Definitely will
- Probably will
- Not sure
- Probably won't
- Definitely won't
Is there anything about researching, buying, or receiving electronics from us that we should fix first?
What is your age range?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
How would you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a report on where we can smooth out the electronics shopping journey.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Includes a matrix question covering website usability, price perception, and trust in shipping/support in one structured block
- Features an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's actual decision path for their most recent electronics purchase, going beyond static rating questions
- Combines Van Westendorp price sensitivity and MaxDiff prioritization of purchase-decision factors, giving quantifiable pricing and trade-off data alongside qualitative journey reconstruction
- Ends with an automated report generation step, turning raw responses directly into a report on where the purchase journey breaks down or succeeds
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Boredom Proneness Scale for Workplace Engagement
Measures how prone employees are to feeling bored or understimulated at work, using a trait-style statement battery, situational triggers, and coping responses. Built for HR, L&D, and people-analytics teams. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent boring moment to separate personality-driven boredom proneness from fixable role-design problems.
템플릿 보기Colleague Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey
Measures how motivated, supported, and connected colleagues feel day to day, benchmarks a recommend-to-a-friend engagement score, and identifies which drivers (recognition, growth, workload, manager support) matter most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each person's score instead of settling for a number.
템플릿 보기사내 커뮤니케이션 효과성 설문조사
이메일, 전체 회의, 채팅 도구 같은 채널 전반에서 귀사의 사내 커뮤니케이션이 직원에게 얼마나 잘 정보를 전달하고, 참여를 이끌어 내며, 도달하는지를 평가합니다. 진술 배터리와 우선순위 지정 활동, 그리고 효과가 있었거나 부족했던 최근의 구체적인 커뮤니케이션 사례를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문을 포함합니다.
템플릿 보기User Interface Usability & Satisfaction Survey
Measures how easy, clear, and satisfying your product's interface is to use in real day-to-day tasks — combining a multi-element usability rating, a trade-off exercise on what to fix first, and an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the exact moment a user got stuck instead of relying on vague complaints.
템플릿 보기Focus Group Participant Screening & Recruitment Survey
Qualifies and recruits candidates for a focus group by screening for category usage, conflicts of interest, prior research participation, and scheduling fit, then capturing core demographics. An AI follow-up interview asks candidates to describe their real experience with the topic in their own words, surfacing rehearsed 'professional respondent' answers and gauging how articulate and engaged they'll be in the room.
템플릿 보기Couple Compatibility & Love Language Assessment
A relationship health check that scores satisfaction, trust, intimacy, communication, and love languages, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into whichever dimension scored lowest. Built for dating apps, matchmakers, and relationship coaches who need more than a vague compatibility score.
템플릿 보기