Group Therapy Program Interest and Preferences Survey
For behavioral health practices and clinics considering a group therapy offering, this survey gauges patient interest, preferred format and focus, and the barriers that hold people back. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reasons behind someone's interest or hesitation so program design reflects what patients would actually attend.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which best describes your current experience with therapy or counseling?
- Currently in individual therapy
- Currently in group therapy
- Have done individual therapy in the past, not currently
- Have done group therapy in the past, not currently
- Have never done therapy
How interested are you in joining a group therapy program if one were offered to you?
Which topics or focus areas would you want a group to address? Select all that apply.
- Anxiety
- Depression or low mood
- Grief and loss
- Relationship or family issues
- Stress and burnout
- Substance use or addiction recovery
- Trauma processing
- Chronic illness or pain coping
If you joined a group, which format would you prefer?
- In-person only
- Virtual (video call) only
- Either works for me
- I would not join either format
Thinking about joining a group therapy program, which of these concerns would matter most to you, and which would matter least?
- Scheduling conflicts with work or family
- Cost or insurance coverage
- Privacy or confidentiality within the group
- Discomfort sharing personal experiences with strangers
- Not feeling like I'd fit with other members
- Travel or transportation to sessions
- Length of the overall time commitment
- Uncertainty about whether it would actually help
How comfortable would you feel sharing personal experiences in front of a small group of people you don't know well?
What group size would feel most manageable to you?
- Small (4-6 people)
- Medium (7-10 people)
- Large (11+ people)
- No preference
How often would you realistically be able to attend group sessions?
- Weekly
- Every other week
- Monthly
- I'm not sure I could commit to a regular schedule
Explore the real drivers behind this person's interest level, anchoring on their stated interest score and their top-ranked concern from the trade-off question. If interest is high, probe what specifically appeals to them and what would make them sign up versus keep delaying. If interest is low or the biggest concern is discomfort/privacy, gently explore what (if anything) could change their mind, or confirm that one-on-one support is simply a better fit for them. If they mention past group therapy experience, ask what worked or didn't work about it.
What is your age range? (optional)
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
How do you describe your gender identity? (optional)
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! We'll use this to shape whether and how we offer group therapy — including topics, formats, and scheduling that actually fit people's lives. Your individual answers stay confidential and are only reviewed in aggregate by our clinical team.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that explores the real drivers behind a patient's interest or hesitation, anchored on their own prior answers, instead of stopping at closed-ended ratings
- Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force-rank which specific concerns (privacy, cost, scheduling, discomfort sharing, etc.) matter most, rather than just listing barriers as a checkbox
- Pairs a comfort rating on sharing personal experiences in a group with format, group-size, and frequency questions so clinics can right-size the program before launch
- Closes with optional age-range and gender-identity demographics and an auto-generated report, keeping the core survey short while still supporting program planning
Jotform
Group Therapy Interest Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use static form template for gauging patient interest in group therapy, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers the basics of interest and availability but relies on fixed question sets rather than any adaptive follow-up. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering nuanced reasons behind hesitation.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template within a widely used, easy-to-customize form builder
- Likely supports quick embedding on a practice website or patient portal
- Simple interest-gauging structure appropriate for initial outreach
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same static fields
- No per-response quality scoring or automated analysis of open-ended nuance
- No transparent, published methodology for how questions were designed
SurveySparrow
Group Therapy Interest Survey Template for FacilitatorsA conversational-style survey template aimed at facilitators assessing group therapy interest, leveraging SurveySparrow's chat-like UI for a friendlier respondent experience. It's a fixed-path template, so 'conversational' here refers to visual presentation rather than dynamic branching based on answers. Useful for a warmer intake feel but not for probing deeper into individual motivations.
잘하는 점
- Chat-style presentation may feel less clinical and more approachable to patients
- Purpose-built for facilitators evaluating group therapy demand
- Ready-to-field template requiring minimal setup
아쉬운 점
- No true AI-driven adaptive interviewing — the conversational format is presentation, not logic-based probing
- No voice AI interview option or screen-share guided tasks
- No transparent prompt visibility or automated report generation described
Typeform
Group Therapy Booking Form TemplateThis is primarily a booking/scheduling form for enrolling patients into group sessions rather than a pre-launch interest and preference survey, so it serves a different stage of the patient journey. It shares Typeform's clean, one-question-at-a-time interface, which improves completion but doesn't substitute for exploratory research on demand or barriers. Clinics already committed to a group program may find it useful downstream of a survey like this one.
잘하는 점
- Polished, mobile-friendly one-question-at-a-time interface known for high completion rates
- Purpose-built for the booking/logistics stage rather than open-ended research
- Easy integration with scheduling and calendar tools typical of Typeform's ecosystem
아쉬운 점
- Not designed to explore interest levels or barriers — no adaptive follow-up or motivation-probing capability
- No mechanism for surfacing why hesitant patients are hesitant before a program is designed
- No automated quality scoring or synthesized report of qualitative responses
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Dental Patient Experience & Satisfaction Survey
Measures how patients experience each stage of a dental visit — booking, wait times, pain management, cost transparency, and trust in the dentist — and what drives their willingness to recommend the practice. Built for dental practices and group practices benchmarking patient experience, with an AI follow-up that uncovers the real story behind low or high recommendation scores, especially around anxiety and trust.
템플릿 보기Minority Teacher Career Choice and Retention Survey
Explores why teachers from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds enter, stay in, or leave the profession — the pull factors, the barriers, and the workplace support that shapes retention. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific turning point behind each person's decision, surfacing detail closed questions can't capture. Built for district HR, teacher-prep programs, and equity researchers.
템플릿 보기의료 분야 경력 교육 및 개발 효과 설문조사
경력 교육 및 개발 프로그램이 임상 및 임상 지원 인력에게 얼마나 잘 제공되고 있는지를 평가합니다 — 무엇을 이수했는지, 직원들이 새로운 기술을 적용하는 데 얼마나 자신감을 느끼는지, 그리고 실천을 가로막는 요인이 무엇인지를 살펴봅니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 최근 실제로 교육 내용을 업무에 적용하려 했던 사례를 깊이 파고들어, 일반적인 만족도 점수로는 놓치는 격차를 드러냅니다.
템플릿 보기Clinical Supervision Quality & Effectiveness Survey
Gathers clinicians' honest experience of the clinical supervision they receive — safety to disclose mistakes, usefulness of feedback, and depth of case discussion — for supervisors, training directors, or agencies auditing supervision quality. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what happened in the most recent supervision session instead of relying on general impressions.
템플릿 보기Contactless Health Screening Experience at Expo Events
Captures how attendees, exhibitors, and staff actually experienced contactless health screening (temperature scans, symptom check-ins, digital health passes) at entry points of an expo or conference. Built for event organizers and venue health & safety teams, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment screening felt slow, confusing, or untrustworthy rather than just a satisfaction score.
템플릿 보기Oral Health Habits & Dental Care Experience Survey
Measures everyday brushing and flossing habits, common symptoms like gum bleeding or sensitivity, satisfaction with dental visits, and the real barriers keeping people from care. Built for dental practices, oral care brands, and public health researchers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific symptom or barrier each respondent flagged, uncovering the actual reasons behind it instead of a generic checkbox.
템플릿 보기