Customer Experience

Guest Blog Contributor Experience Survey

Measures how guest bloggers and outside contributors experienced your pitching, editorial, and publishing process — from response times to backlink fairness. Built for content marketing and editorial teams that manage a guest-posting program. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific friction points behind low satisfaction or referral scores so you know exactly what to fix before your next contributor.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Hi! Thanks for contributing a guest post for us. We'd love to hear how the process felt from your side so we can make it smoother for future writers. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02

객관식필수

How did you first connect with us about writing a guest post?

I pitched them directly
They invited/reached out to me
Found the opportunity through a search or directory
Referred by another writer or contact
Saw a call for contributors on social media
Other

Q03

의견 척도필수

How easy was it to pitch your idea and get it approved?

척도: 1 – 5

최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy

Q04

매트릭스필수

Rate the following parts of the editorial process:

4개 행 × 5개 열

Speed of their response to your pitch
Clarity of their content/style guidelines
Quality and usefulness of editorial feedback
Turnaround time on edits before publishing

열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very Good · Excellent

Q05

의견 척도필수

How satisfied are you with how your post turned out once it was published?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied

Q06

객관식필수

Did you receive the byline, author bio, and backlink you expected in exchange for your post?

Yes, fully as expected
Partially — something was missing or altered
No, I did not receive what was expected
Not applicable — I wasn't expecting attribution

Q07

의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend writing a guest post for this site to another writer you know?

척도: 0 – 10

최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely

Q08

AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their satisfaction with the published result. If the score was low, identify the single most frustrating moment in the pitching, editing, or publishing process and what would have fixed it. If the score was high, find out which specific part of the experience (response speed, editorial feedback, attribution, communication) made the biggest positive difference, and whether any part still fell short despite the overall good experience.

Q09

객관식필수

Based on this experience, would you write another guest post for us in the future?

Yes, definitely
Maybe, depending on the topic or terms
Unlikely
No

Q10

장문형

If you could change one thing about our guest posting process, what would it be?

Q11

객관식

Which best describes you as a writer?

Independent blogger
Freelance writer
Industry expert/practitioner
Marketer/PR professional pitching on behalf of a brand
Other
Prefer not to say

Q12

객관식

How many years have you been writing content for publication (blogs, articles, etc.)?

Less than 1 year
1-3 years
4-7 years
8+ years
Prefer not to say

Q13

메시지

That's everything — thank you for taking the time to share your experience! Your feedback goes directly to our editorial team and will shape how we work with guest contributors going forward.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Goes beyond a one-time intake form by asking about the full experience — from first pitch outreach through post-publication satisfaction, byline/backlink delivery, and likelihood to recommend or write again
Includes a matrix question rating multiple parts of the editorial process side by side, so you can pinpoint exactly where friction occurred (pitching, editing, publishing, etc.)
An AI follow-up interview automatically probes the reasoning behind a low recommend or satisfaction score, surfacing the specific friction points you'd otherwise have to guess at
Captures writer segmentation (writer type, years of experience) and an open-ended 'one thing to change' question, giving editorial teams both quantifiable and qualitative fixes to act on

Jotform

Guest Blog Posting Form Template

This is a static intake form for collecting guest post submissions (pitch details, bio, content), not a post-experience satisfaction survey. It's fielding-ready as a submission form but doesn't measure how contributors felt about your editorial process afterward. Useful for the front-end of a guest-posting program rather than the feedback loop.

잘하는 점

Simple drag-and-drop form builder with quick setup
Likely offers a free tier for basic form collection
Familiar, widely-used form platform for content submission intake

아쉬운 점

Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into why a contributor was dissatisfied
No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated experience report
Focused on submission intake, not on measuring satisfaction, backlink fairness, or likelihood to refer

SurveySparrow

Guest Blog Posting Form

Another submission-style form template for guest post pitches, framed as a marketing template rather than a dedicated contributor-experience survey. It can collect basic pitch and bio information but isn't built to measure satisfaction with editorial turnaround, backlink delivery, or referral likelihood. Fielding-ready for intake, not for post-publication feedback.

잘하는 점

Conversational form format that may feel more approachable to contributors
Part of a broader survey/form platform with built-in analytics dashboards
Quick to deploy for capturing pitch submissions

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI interview to explore the reasoning behind low satisfaction or referral scores
No mention of voice AI interviews or screen-share guided tasks
Built for pitch intake rather than measuring the end-to-end contributor experience

자주 묻는 질문