모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

How Well Do You Know Me Relationship Quiz

A guessing-game survey for partners, family, friends, or teammates to test how accurately they can predict someone's habits, preferences, and values — with an AI follow-up that unpacks the reasoning behind their most confident (and shakiest) guesses. Built to be customized with the actual subject's traits before sending.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Ready to find out how well you really know them? Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Answer as if you were guessing on their behalf — there are no wrong answers, just honest guesses. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

What's your relationship to the person you're guessing about?

  • Partner or spouse
  • Family member
  • Close friend
  • Coworker
  • Other
Q03
점수 배분필수

If they had a completely free Saturday, how do you think they'd split their time across these? Distribute 100 points to match your best guess. (Template note: swap in activity categories that fit this specific person before launching, e.g. 'gaming', 'hiking'.)

  • Resting at home
  • Time with people
  • A hobby or personal project
  • Errands or chores
  • Something adventurous
100점 배분
Q04
객관식필수

When they're stressed, what's their go-to comfort food or drink? (Template note: replace these options with real choices specific to this person before sending.)

  • Something sweet
  • Something salty and crunchy
  • A hot drink
  • Comfort food from home
  • They don't really do comfort food
Q05
객관식필수

What's their biggest pet peeve? (Template note: replace with plausible options specific to the subject; keep the 'other' option open.)

  • People being late
  • Loud chewing or noises
  • Being interrupted
  • Messiness
  • Small talk
Q06
순위 매기기필수

Guess how they'd rank these in terms of what matters most to them in life right now, from most to least important.

  1. Career or work
  2. Family
  3. Friendships
  4. Personal growth
  5. Financial security
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
매트릭스필수

How confident are you in what you know about each of these parts of their life?

5개 행 × 4개 열
  • Their hobbies and interests
  • Their work or daily routine
  • Their emotional needs and stress triggers
  • Their past experiences and history
  • Their sense of humor
: Know very well · Know somewhat · Not sure · No idea
Q08
의견 척도필수

Overall, how confident are you in your guesses on this survey?

척도: 110
최소:Just guessing blindly최대:Extremely confident
Q09
단문형

What's one thing about them you learned recently that actually surprised you?

Q10
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through the guess they felt most confident about and explain exactly why they believe it's true — what memory, habit, or conversation it's based on. Then ask them to do the same for their least confident guess, and probe gently on whether that uncertainty reflects distance in the relationship or just a topic that's never come up. If they mention a recent surprise, dig into what it revealed about how well they actually know this person.

Q11
객관식

How long have you known this person? (Optional)

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 3-10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which age range are you in? (Optional)

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's a wrap! Your guesses will be compared against their real answers to reveal how well you actually know each other — thanks for playing.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Built specifically as a customizable guessing-game framework where the sender inputs the actual subject's real traits before sending, rather than a fixed generic quiz
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through the reasoning behind their most confident guess, surfacing insight a static multiple-choice format can't capture
  • Combines ranking, constant-sum, matrix, and opinion-scale question types to measure both what respondents guess and how confident they are in each guess
  • Closes with a short-text reflection on a recent surprising discovery, adding a qualitative layer beyond simple right/wrong scoring

Jotform

How Well Do You Know Your Partner Quiz Form Template

A ready-to-field form template built around a couples-focused 'know your partner' quiz format, usable as-is or edited in Jotform's form builder. It's a static question set rather than an adaptive interview, aimed narrowly at romantic partners rather than the broader friends/family/teammates use case. Good for quick, low-cost fielding but with limited built-in follow-up depth.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for the partner-quiz use case with an easy drag-and-drop builder
  • Free to use and quick to deploy
  • Large template library for related quiz/form needs

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe reasoning behind guesses — questions are fixed once built
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or confidence analysis across answers
  • Scoped to partner relationships, not easily framed for family/teammate variants

QuestionPro

How Well Do You Know Me Survey Template

A general-purpose 'how well do you know me' survey template within QuestionPro's broader survey platform, suitable for fielding across relationship types. It provides a structured question set but relies on standard survey logic rather than conversational AI probing, and reporting is templated rather than interview-derived. Positioned as one template among QuestionPro's large enterprise survey catalog.

잘하는 점

  • Flexible template usable across friends, family, or coworker contexts
  • Backed by a full-featured enterprise survey platform with robust analytics
  • Established survey logic and branching tools for customization

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview or voice interview option to unpack reasoning behind guesses
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
  • No automated per-response quality scoring built into the guessing-game format itself

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Supermarket Shopping Attitudes and Habits Survey

Captures how shoppers choose, evaluate, and switch between grocery stores and channels — price sensitivity, loyalty behavior, and channel mix — for retail and CPG researchers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind a shopper's most recent store choice or channel switch, beyond what a closed question can capture.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

경쟁 소매점 비교 설문조사

가격, 상품 구색, 서비스, 편의성 측면에서 귀사의 매장을 지목된 경쟁사와 벤치마킹한 후, AI 후속 질문을 통해 쇼핑객이 특정 매장을 다른 매장보다 선택한 구체적인 순간을 재구성합니다. 지갑 점유율(share-of-wallet)과 경쟁적 포지셔닝을 추적하는 소매 인사이트 팀을 위해 제작되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

유기농 식품 구매 행동 및 신뢰도 설문조사

사람들이 실제로 유기농 식품을 얼마나 자주 구매하는지, 어떤 인증과 표시가 실제로 구매 결정을 좌우하는지, 유기농 라벨에 대한 신뢰도, 그리고 가격 민감도를 측정합니다 — 일반화된 태도가 아니라 최근의 유기농 구매(또는 구매하지 않은) 경험 뒤에 있는 실제 이야기를 재구성하는 AI 후속 인터뷰가 포함됩니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

슈퍼마켓 선택 기준 및 쇼핑객 충성도 설문

쇼핑객이 특정 슈퍼마켓을 선택하고 계속 이용하게 만드는 실제 요인 — 가격, 신선도, 편의성, 리워드 — 을 밝혀냅니다. 최선-최악 상충 관계 연습, 만족도 배터리, 그리고 최근의 매장 전환 또는 전환 고민의 실제 이야기를 재구성하는 AI 후속 인터뷰를 활용합니다. 식료품 소매 및 카테고리 인사이트 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Retail Shopping and Product Search Behavior Survey

Maps how shoppers browse, search, and decide across in-store, online, and marketplace channels — where product searches succeed or break down, which purchase factors carry the most weight, and what an AI follow-up interview uncovers about the last time someone couldn't find what they wanted. Built for retail, e-commerce, and merchandising teams optimizing search, navigation, and discovery.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Disaster Preparedness and Response Readiness Survey

Assesses how prepared people actually felt, what emergency communications and procedures worked, and where gaps showed up during a real event or drill. Built for emergency management teams, facilities, and HSE departments benchmarking readiness, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs exactly what happened during the respondent's most recent disaster or drill instead of relying on general perceptions.

템플릿 보기