Employee & HR

Employee Job Satisfaction & Engagement Survey

Measures overall job satisfaction, the specific drivers behind it (workload, manager support, growth, recognition, pay, work-life balance), and retention risk — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the real reason behind each employee's satisfaction score instead of just the number. Built for HR teams running quarterly or annual pulse checks.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Hi! We're checking in on how things are going at work. Your answers are used to improve the employee experience, and individual responses are kept confidential. This should take about 6 minutes — thanks for your honesty.

Q02

의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with your job right now?

척도: 1 – 5

최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied

Q03

매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your current role?

6개 행 × 5개 열

My workload is manageable
My manager supports me when I need it
I have clear opportunities to grow here
My contributions are recognized
I'm paid fairly for the work I do
외 1개

열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree

Q04

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

If you could improve only a few things about your job, which would matter most to you — and which would matter least?

Compensation and benefits
Career growth opportunities
Work-life balance
Recognition for my work
Quality of management
Team culture and relationships
Job security
Meaningful, interesting work

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least

Q05

평점 척도필수

How would you rate your direct manager overall?

범위: 1 – 5

최소:Poor최대:Excellent

Q06

의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this company as a good place to work to a friend or former colleague?

척도: 0 – 10

최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely

Q07

객관식필수

How often have you thought about leaving your job in the last 3 months?

Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Almost constantly

Q08

AI 인터뷰

Probe the real story behind this person's overall satisfaction score and their thoughts about leaving: ask what specifically drives that score, anchor on a recent example (a good week or a frustrating one) rather than general impressions. If they picked a top priority in the trade-off question, dig into what a real fix would look like for them. If they've been thinking about leaving 'often' or 'almost constantly', gently probe whether it's role-specific, manager-specific, or company-wide, without being alarmist.

Q09

장문형

Is there anything about your job or team that we haven't asked about but should know?

Q10

객관식

Which department do you work in? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list before launching.)

Engineering
Sales
Marketing
Customer Support
Operations
People/HR
Finance
Other

Q11

객관식

How long have you worked at the company?

Less than 6 months
6 months to 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Prefer not to say

Q12

객관식

Which best describes your role?

Individual contributor
People manager
Senior leadership
Prefer not to say

Q13

메시지

Thank you for sharing this with us. Your responses will be combined with your team's (never shared individually) to shape concrete changes to management practices, growth paths, and workload.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Goes beyond a satisfaction score with an AI follow-up interview that probes the real story behind each employee's rating and retention risk, rather than leaving low scores unexplained
Combines structured drivers (workload, manager support, growth, recognition, pay, work-life balance via a matrix and rating question) with an open-ended catch-all question so nothing important gets missed
Includes a MaxDiff prioritization question so HR teams learn which improvements matter most to employees, not just how they feel overall
Built specifically for recurring quarterly/annual pulse cycles, with department, tenure, and role questions ready to be customized per organization

Jotform

Healthcare Employee Satisfaction Survey Form Template

This is a niche variant built for healthcare employers rather than a general-purpose job satisfaction survey, so it's only partially comparable. It's a static, fielding-ready form rather than an interview-style tool. Jotform's strength is fast form building and integrations, not deep qualitative follow-up.

잘하는 점

Ready-to-deploy form specifically tailored to healthcare workplace context
Benefits from Jotform's broader form-building ecosystem (logic, integrations, styling)

아쉬운 점

Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore why an employee gave a particular rating
Healthcare-specific framing makes it less directly reusable for general corporate HR teams
No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted

QuestionPro

Employee Satisfaction Survey Template

A general employee satisfaction template from an established survey platform, covering standard satisfaction and engagement topics. It's a conventional static questionnaire aimed at broad HR use cases rather than a guided interview experience. Good baseline coverage but leaves interpretation of 'why' scores occur to the HR team.

잘하는 점

Broad, established template library and enterprise survey infrastructure
Likely includes standard engagement/satisfaction question banks and reporting dashboards

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI probing into the reasons behind a satisfaction or eNPS-style score
Static question flow, so follow-up depth depends entirely on how many questions HR pre-writes
No transparent, publishable prompt logic since it isn't an AI-interview format

SurveyMonkey

Employee Satisfaction Survey Template

A widely used, general-purpose employee satisfaction template well suited to quick deployment and benchmarking. It relies on standard closed-ended questions and comment boxes rather than conversational follow-up. Strong for broad reach and familiarity, less suited to uncovering the specific 'why' behind each response.

잘하는 점

Well-known, easy-to-deploy template with strong brand trust for HR audiences
Likely supports benchmarking against SurveyMonkey's aggregate survey data

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI interview to dig into individual reasons behind scores; relies on generic open-text boxes
No voice-based interview option for capturing richer qualitative feedback
No per-response quality scoring or automated methodology transparency

SurveySparrow

Company Satisfaction Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template covering overall company satisfaction, which overlaps meaningfully with job satisfaction and engagement topics. It's built as a single fixed-flow chat-like survey rather than one with true adaptive AI-driven follow-up. Useful for a friendlier survey-taking experience, but not an interview-based probing tool.

잘하는 점

Conversational UI style that can feel more approachable than a traditional form
General company satisfaction focus that touches on engagement and retention themes

아쉬운 점

Conversational format does not include AI-generated follow-up questions tailored to each answer
No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt documentation

자주 묻는 질문