모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Magazine Reader Engagement & Content Satisfaction Survey

Measures how readers actually consume a magazine — print or digital — how satisfied they are with specific sections, and which content types they'd trade off against each other. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each reader's satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing the specific articles, sections, or frustrations that closed questions miss.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Hi! Thanks for reading — we'd love a few minutes of your time to understand what you think of the magazine. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Honest answers help us plan future issues. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

How do you typically read this magazine?

  • Print copy
  • Digital edition or app
  • Website articles
  • Both print and digital
Q03
객관식필수

Out of the last 3 issues, how many did you read all or most of?

  • None
  • One
  • Two
  • All three
Q04
매트릭스필수

How would you rate your satisfaction with each of these parts of the magazine?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Feature articles
  • Columns and opinion pieces
  • Photography and visual design
  • Cover design
  • Balance of advertising to editorial content
: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these content types matter most to you when deciding whether to pick up or open an issue?

  • Investigative or long-form features
  • Celebrity or personality profiles
  • How-to or practical guides
  • Opinion and commentary
  • Photography or visual essays
  • Industry news and trends
  • Reader letters or community content
  • Product or service reviews
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to me최악:Matters least to me
Q06
평점 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with this magazine right now?

범위: 15
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this magazine to a friend or colleague?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation and satisfaction scores. Anchor on the actual issue, article, or section they're thinking of. If the score was low, probe what would need to change for them to recommend it; if high, probe what specifically made them an advocate. If they mentioned a content type as least valuable in the trade-off question, ask why it still runs in the magazine from their perspective.

Q09
객관식

Going forward, which format would you prefer to read this magazine in?

  • Print only
  • Digital only
  • Both print and digital
  • No preference
Q10
객관식필수

How do you currently access this magazine?

  • Paid subscriber
  • Newsstand or single-copy buyer
  • Free or complimentary reader
  • Digital-only access
Q11
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which gender do you identify as?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for sharing your honest feedback! Your answers will feed directly into editorial planning for upcoming issues.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific reasoning behind each reader's satisfaction and recommendation scores, not just a static open-text box
  • Combines quantitative measures (satisfaction matrix, MaxDiff content trade-offs, recommendation scale) with qualitative depth in one flow
  • Captures format and access habits (print vs. digital, how often issues are read) alongside content satisfaction for a fuller consumption picture
  • Auto-generates a report from responses, saving manual analysis of open-ended feedback

Jotform

Magazine Reader Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's designed for quick deployment and easy branding/embedding but relies on standard closed-ended questions. No mention of adaptive follow-up questioning or automated response scoring.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template with drag-and-drop customization
  • Backed by Jotform's broad form-building ecosystem and integrations
  • Easy to embed or share via link

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI probing into individual answers
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses

Typeform

Magazine Reader Survey Template

A polished, conversational-style survey template known for Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time UX. It's fielding-ready and visually engaging, but the conversational feel is templated logic, not true AI-driven follow-up interviewing. No voice interview or guided task options are indicated.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, one-question-at-a-time interface that boosts completion rates
  • Fielding-ready with strong design customization
  • Good brand recognition for engaging survey experiences

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — logic branches are pre-set, not generated from each response
  • No voice AI interview or screen-share task capability
  • No transparent prompt or automated scoring methodology published

SurveySparrow

Reader Satisfaction Survey Template

A conversational, chat-style survey template aimed at reader satisfaction measurement, fielding-ready out of the box. It emphasizes a friendly conversational tone similar to a chat interface, but questioning still follows fixed paths rather than true adaptive interviewing. No automated per-response quality scoring is indicated.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template with a conversational chat-style format
  • Marketing-focused template positioning for reader/audience feedback
  • Easy to customize within SurveySparrow's platform

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview that digs deeper based on individual answers
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated report generation or per-response quality scoring described

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Pre-Visit Psychiatric Evaluation Intake Questionnaire

A pre-appointment intake for mental health clinics that captures a patient's presenting concern, symptom frequency across common domains, functional impact, safety status, and treatment history before a first psychiatric visit. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs concrete recent examples behind the ratings and checks in sensitively on any safety responses. Not a substitute for crisis assessment.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

GMP Audit Checklist And Compliance Readiness Survey

A structured self-assessment for Good Manufacturing Practice audits — covering documentation, training, equipment, supplier qualification, validation, and CAPA management. An AI follow-up interview digs into the root cause behind your most significant finding, going beyond a pass/fail checklist to surface systemic issues before the next regulatory inspection.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Auditor Job Application Screening Survey

A structured intake for auditor candidates that captures experience level, certifications, technical proficiency, and role priorities, then uses an AI follow-up interview to probe a real audit challenge the candidate has handled. Built for audit firm recruiters and hiring managers who need comparable, behavior-based screening data before a live interview.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation

Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Psychiatric Intake and Symptom Screening Survey

A pre-appointment intake for mental health practices that captures presenting concerns, symptom frequency over the last two weeks, treatment history, and safety screening before the first visit — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the story behind the symptoms (onset, triggers, what's changed) so clinicians walk in with context instead of a blank checklist.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Public Opinion Poll on a Current Issue

A flexible opinion-poll template for gauging where people stand on a policy, event, or public issue — covering awareness, position, reasoning, and priority concerns. An AI follow-up interview digs into the personal experience or belief behind each respondent's stance instead of just recording a for/against label. Swap in your specific issue and options before launch.

템플릿 보기