Mailing List Subscriber Engagement Survey
Finds out whether your email newsletter is earning opens, feels relevant, and is sent at the right cadence — for anyone who owns a mailing list. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reason behind low relevance or satisfaction scores instead of settling for a number.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 30 days, how many of our emails did you open?
- None of them
- One or two
- About half
- Most or all of them
How relevant is the content in our emails to your interests right now?
How useful is each type of content we send?
- Product updates (Replace with your own content type)
- Tips and how-tos (Replace with your own content type)
- Promotions and discounts (Replace with your own content type)
- Industry news (Replace with your own content type)
How often would you ideally like to hear from us?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- Once a week
- Every two weeks
- Once a month or less
Which of these topics matter most to you in future emails, and which matter least?
- New product announcements (Replace with your own topic)
- How-to guides and tutorials (Replace with your own topic)
- Customer success stories (Replace with your own topic)
- Discounts and special offers (Replace with your own topic)
- Industry trends and news (Replace with your own topic)
- Behind-the-scenes company updates (Replace with your own topic)
- Event and webinar invites (Replace with your own topic)
Overall, how satisfied are you with our emails?
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's relevance and satisfaction ratings, anchoring on whichever content type they rated least useful in the earlier grid. If they gave a low relevance score, find out what content or topic would make the emails feel worth opening; if they gave a high score, find out which specific email or moment stood out and why. If they mention wanting a different frequency, ask what triggered that preference (too much volume, missed emails, timing).
If you could change one thing about our emails, what would it be?
How long have you been subscribed to our mailing list?
- Less than a month
- 1-6 months
- 6-12 months
- Over a year
- Not sure
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your relationship to us?
- Current customer
- Past customer
- Prospective customer
- Just interested in the content
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for the feedback! We use responses like yours to decide what we send, how often, and to whom — nothing here affects whether you stay on the list unless you choose to unsubscribe.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Combines closed-ended cadence, relevance, and satisfaction ratings with an AI follow-up interview that automatically probes why a subscriber gave a low relevance or satisfaction score, instead of leaving that reasoning to guesswork
- Includes a matrix question to compare usefulness across content types and a max-diff exercise to rank future topic priorities, giving structured signal beyond a single satisfaction number
- Captures subscriber tenure and relationship type so low scores can be segmented by how long someone has been on the list or how they relate to the brand
- Ends with a short open-text question and a transparent closing message explaining how responses will be used, and every AI prompt used in the interview is disclosed rather than hidden
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
펀런 등록 경험 및 가격 설문조사
참가자들이 펀런에 등록한 이유, 온라인 등록 및 결제 과정이 얼마나 매끄러웠는지, 그리고 어떤 참가비가 적정하다고 느끼는지를 파악합니다. 아울러 등록 편의성 평가가 낮은 배경에 있는 구체적인 불편 요소를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문이 포함되어 있습니다. 등록 흐름, 커뮤니케이션, 가격 정책을 개선하려는 대회 주최자와 이벤트 마케터를 위해 제작되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Politician Statement Reaction & Credibility Survey
Captures how a specific statement from a public official lands with real people — whether they'd heard it, how they interpret it, and what it does to their trust. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each reaction, surfacing the specific words or context driving approval, skepticism, or backlash.
템플릿 보기멘토십 지지 및 후원 효과 설문
멘토십 프로그램이 단순한 조언 대화를 넘어 실질적인 지지 — 소개, 추천, 후원 — 를 만들어 내고 있는지를 측정합니다. 프로그램 담당자와 L&D 팀을 위해 설계되었으며, 수치 뒤에 숨겨진 지지의 구체적인 사례(또는 그 부재)를 드러내는 AI 후속 질문을 포함합니다.
템플릿 보기Employee Pay Equity & Wage Gap Perception Survey
Measures how fairly employees believe compensation is distributed across gender, race, tenure, and role, and pinpoints which pay decisions or comparisons shape that perception. Built for HR and People Analytics teams auditing pay equity, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the specific story behind a respondent's lowest fairness rating instead of just the number.
템플릿 보기Grant Application Process Experience Survey
Captures how applicants experienced your grant application process — from finding guidelines to hearing back on a decision — for foundations, government agencies, and grant-making bodies. An AI follow-up interview digs into the exact stage that caused the most friction, so program teams know precisely what to fix before the next funding cycle.
템플릿 보기Pet Adoption Experience & Post-Adoption Outcomes Survey
Measures how satisfied recent adopters are with your shelter or rescue's adoption process, pet-matching accuracy, and post-adoption support — for animal welfare organizations wanting to improve placement quality. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment where expectations about the pet's health, temperament, or care needs diverged from reality.
템플릿 보기