모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Multiple Intelligences Strengths Self-Assessment

Helps individuals, coaches, and L&D teams identify a person's dominant ways of thinking and learning (word, number, picture, body, music, people, self, and nature smarts), then uses an AI follow-up interview to surface a concrete, real-life example of their top strength in action rather than just a self-rated label.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This short assessment explores the different ways you naturally think, learn, and solve problems — there are no right or wrong answers, just what feels most like you. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It takes about 6-8 minutes.

Q02
슬라이더 매트릭스필수

How often does each of these describe you?

8개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
  • I enjoy reading, writing, or playing with words
  • I like solving logic puzzles, patterns, or math problems
  • I think in pictures and enjoy drawing, designing, or visualizing ideas
  • I learn best by moving, building, or doing something hands-on
  • I can easily pick up melodies, rhythms, or song lyrics
  • 외 3개
슬라이더 0–10최소:Never like me최대:Always like me
Q03
순위 매기기필수

Rank these ways of thinking and doing from most to least natural for you.

  1. Word smart (language, writing, storytelling)
  2. Number/logic smart (reasoning, patterns, math)
  3. Picture smart (visual and spatial thinking)
  4. Body smart (movement, hands-on skill)
  5. Music smart (rhythm, melody, sound)
  6. People smart (understanding and working with others)
  7. Self smart (self-awareness and reflection)
  8. Nature smart (observing and categorizing the natural world)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q04
객관식필수

In a group project, which role do you gravitate toward first?

  • The one who organizes the plan and logic of the task
  • The one who sketches, designs, or visualizes the end result
  • The one who builds or physically assembles the solution
  • The one who keeps the group's morale and communication on track
  • The one who works out the details alone before sharing back
Q05
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that you know your own strongest way of thinking or learning?

척도: 15
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to describe a specific, recent moment when they were doing something that matched their top-ranked way of thinking (referencing their highest-ranked item from the earlier ranking question). Probe for concrete details: what task were they doing, what made it feel effortless or energizing, and how did it differ from a task that drained them. If their ranking and their slider answers point to different top strengths, gently ask them to reconcile the difference.

Q07
장문형

Is there a skill, hobby, or way of working that you feel doesn't fit neatly into the categories above? Describe it briefly.

Q08
메시지

Last part — a few quick background questions to help us understand patterns across different groups. All are optional.

Q09
객관식

Which best describes your current role or setting?

  • Student
  • Educator or trainer
  • Corporate professional
  • Creative or design field
  • Healthcare or caregiving
  • Trades or hands-on work
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for taking the time to reflect on how you think and learn! Your answers will be used to build a personalized strengths summary and to spot broader patterns across respondents.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a slider matrix and forced-choice ranking to triangulate self-rated strengths across all eight intelligence types, not just a single quiz score
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to ask respondents to describe a specific, recent moment when their top strength was in action, turning a label into a concrete example
  • Captures nuance with an open-ended question about skills or working styles that don't fit neatly into the standard categories, plus a confidence rating on self-knowledge
  • Collects role/setting, age range, and gender as background variables so coaches and L&D teams can look for patterns across groups, all wrapped in a conversational chat-message flow

Typeform

Multiple Intelligences Survey Form Template

A ready-to-field Typeform template covering the classic multiple intelligences framework with Typeform's signature clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface. It's built for self-scoring style assessment rather than deeper qualitative follow-up. Good for quick, polished distribution but stays at the level of fixed-choice questions.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, on-brand conversational form design
  • Quick to deploy and share via Typeform's distribution tools
  • Mobile-friendly, familiar UX for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe for a real-life example behind a self-rated strength
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • Static question set with no transparent AI prompt methodology

Jotform

Multiple Intelligence Survey Form Template

Jotform's template offers a straightforward, customizable form for gathering multiple intelligence self-ratings, backed by Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder and integrations. It's a solid fielding-ready static form but relies on fixed question types rather than any conversational or adaptive interviewing. Best suited for teams that just want a quick data-collection form to customize.

잘하는 점

  • Highly customizable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Wide range of integrations (sheets, CRMs, notifications)
  • Easy to embed or share as a standalone form

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview or voice interview option
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • No auto-generated narrative reports summarizing individual results

QuestionPro

Multiple Intelligence Survey for Students Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This QuestionPro page is presented as a sample questionnaire and question bank oriented toward students, more of a reference/guide with example questions than a single polished, ready-to-field template. It benefits from QuestionPro's broader survey logic and reporting tools, but the multiple-intelligence content itself is static question examples. Useful for inspiration or building your own survey rather than launching as-is.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by QuestionPro's mature survey logic and reporting suite
  • Provides sample questions across intelligence types for reference
  • Can be adapted using QuestionPro's broader survey customization options

아쉬운 점

  • Framed as a question guide/sample rather than a single fielding-ready template
  • No adaptive AI interview to surface a concrete example behind a stated strength
  • No transparent AI prompt or automated quality-scoring system

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Reiki Session Intake & Client Intention Survey

A pre-session intake for reiki and energy healing practitioners that captures a client's physical and emotional state, comfort with touch, and health considerations before hands-on work begins. An AI follow-up interview digs into the client's stated intention so practitioners can tailor the session to what's really driving the visit, not just the surface request.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Post-Workshop Feedback and Facilitator Effectiveness Survey

Captures how attendees rate a workshop's content, pacing, and facilitator right after it ends, plus how likely they are to recommend it — for training teams and event organizers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped each person's recommendation score, going beyond star ratings to what actually landed or fell flat.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Dance Audition Experience Feedback Survey

Captures how dancers experienced your audition process — from communication and choreography teaching to callback follow-up — so studios, companies, and choreographers can improve turnout and reputation. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind how results and feedback were (or weren't) communicated. Built for dance companies, casting directors, and studio owners running auditions.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

입주자 만족도 및 임대 계약 갱신 설문조사

입주자가 귀하의 건물에서 유지보수, 소통, 가치, 안전에 대해 어떻게 느끼는지, 그리고 실제로 갱신 결정을 이끄는 요인이 무엇인지를 측정합니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 일반적인 불만에 그치지 않고 가장 낮게 평가한 항목 뒤에 있는 구체적인 사건이나 절충점을 파고듭니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey

Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.

템플릿 보기