AI Literacy Self-Assessment for Undergraduates
A validated self-assessment instrument measuring undergraduate AI literacy across five dimensions: conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, and awareness of limitations. Estimated completion time: 10-12 minutes.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Are you currently enrolled as an undergraduate student at a college or university?
- Yes
- No
How often do you use AI-powered tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Grammarly, DALL-E) for any purpose?
- Never
- A few times a year
- A few times a month
- A few times a week
- Daily or almost daily
The following statements describe knowledge and skills related to AI concepts. For each statement, please indicate how much you agree or disagree based on your current abilities.
I can use AI-powered tools effectively to help me complete academic tasks (e.g., research, writing, coding).
I can identify when an AI tool has generated inaccurate or fabricated information.
I can identify ethical concerns that arise from using AI tools in academic work.
I can describe the types of tasks where current AI systems are likely to perform poorly or unreliably.
Overall, how would you rate your current level of AI literacy?
Thinking about your responses throughout this survey, what do you see as the biggest gap in your own AI literacy, and what would help you address it?
Finally, we have a few questions about your background for classification purposes.
Which of the following AI-powered tools have you used at least once? Select all that apply.
- ChatGPT
- Microsoft Copilot
- Google Gemini
- Claude
- Grammarly
- DALL-E / Midjourney / other image generators
- GitHub Copilot / coding assistants
- AI-powered search (e.g., Perplexity, Bing AI)
- Other AI tools
- I have never used any AI tools
I can explain the basic concept of artificial intelligence in my own words.
I can write clear and specific prompts to get useful results from generative AI tools.
I can evaluate whether AI-generated content is well-reasoned and supported by evidence.
I can explain the privacy implications of sharing personal or sensitive data with AI tools.
I can explain why AI systems sometimes generate confident-sounding but incorrect responses.
How prepared do you feel to use AI tools responsibly and effectively in your academic and professional life?
What is your current year of undergraduate study?
- First year / Freshman
- Second year / Sophomore
- Third year / Junior
- Fourth year / Senior
- Fifth year or beyond
- Prefer not to say
Have you completed any formal course, workshop, or training that covered artificial intelligence or machine learning concepts?
- Yes, a full course (e.g., semester-long)
- Yes, a short workshop or training session
- No, but I have learned informally (e.g., online videos, articles)
- No, I have no formal or informal AI education
I can describe how a machine learning model learns patterns from data.
I can choose the most appropriate AI tool for a specific task from among the options available to me.
I can recognize potential biases in the outputs produced by AI systems.
I can evaluate whether using an AI tool in a specific academic situation would be considered a violation of academic integrity.
I can identify situations where it would be inappropriate or risky to rely on AI-generated outputs.
Which of the following best describes your primary field of study?
- Computer Science / Information Technology
- Engineering
- Natural Sciences (e.g., Biology, Chemistry, Physics)
- Mathematics / Statistics
- Social Sciences (e.g., Psychology, Sociology, Political Science)
- Business / Economics
- Humanities (e.g., English, History, Philosophy)
- Arts / Design / Media
- Health Sciences / Nursing
- Education
- Other
- Undeclared / Undecided
- Prefer not to say
I can explain the difference between AI that follows predefined rules and AI that learns from examples.
I can modify and refine AI-generated outputs to improve their quality and relevance for my needs.
I can verify AI-generated claims by cross-referencing them with credible sources.
I can articulate how AI systems might perpetuate or amplify societal inequities.
I understand that AI systems do not truly comprehend or understand information the way humans do.
What is your age?
- 18 or under
- 19-20
- 21-22
- 23-25
- 26-30
- 31 or older
- Prefer not to say
I can describe what training data is and why it matters for AI system performance.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Includes an AI follow-up interview question that asks respondents to reflect on the biggest gap in their AI literacy after seeing their own scale responses, enabling deeper, personalized probing that a static form cannot replicate
- Structured across the five stated dimensions (conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, awareness of limitations) with dedicated opinion-scale items for each, rather than a generic single-topic checklist
- Opens with screening questions (enrollment status, tool usage frequency, prior AI training) so responses can be segmented by actual undergraduate experience level before the literacy items begin
- Closes with classification questions (year of study, field of study, age) enabling cross-tab analysis of AI literacy by academic background, and produces an auto-generated report from the collected data
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
생성형 AI와 학생 학습 경험 설문조사
생성형 AI 도구가 학습 심화, 비판적 사고, 지식 유지, 메타인지 인식 전반에 걸쳐 학생의 학습 성과에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 측정하는 연구 도구입니다. 사전/사후 및 실험 연구 설계를 위해 고안되었습니다. 예상 소요 시간: 10~14분.
템플릿 보기AI Chatbot Effectiveness in Student Advising & Support
This survey evaluates student experiences with AI chatbot advising and support services. It measures usage patterns, task types, perceived success rates, satisfaction, trust, comparison to human advisors, and areas for improvement.
템플릿 보기Instructor Readiness for AI Integration
This survey assesses instructor preparedness to integrate artificial intelligence into teaching, covering technology proficiency, AI literacy, pedagogical confidence, institutional support, professional development needs, and workload concerns. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
템플릿 보기Faculty Perspectives on AI in Grading & Assessment
An academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
템플릿 보기Post-Training Learning Transfer Assessment
Measures how effectively employees apply recent training to their jobs, identifying barriers, enablers, and perceived outcomes to improve learning transfer and training ROI.
템플릿 보기Course Engagement & Learning Outcomes Pulse Survey
A bi-weekly pulse survey measuring student engagement behaviors, support resource usage, and perceived learning progress. Designed for course instructors and instructional designers seeking actionable insights to improve eLearning and hybrid course experiences.
템플릿 보기