Industry-Specific

Online Proposal Experience & Decision Feedback Survey

Captures how recipients experienced a business proposal sent through an online proposal tool — clarity, ease of review, trust signals, and what ultimately drove their decision. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real reasoning behind an accept, decline, or stall, going beyond the surface-level rating. Built for sales, agency, and proposal-software teams who want to improve close rates.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for taking a moment to share feedback on the proposal you recently received! This helps the team improve how proposals are put together. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 8 minutes, and there are no wrong answers.

Q02

객관식필수

What was the outcome of the proposal you received?

I accepted it
I'm still deciding
I declined it
I requested changes before deciding

Q03

객관식

How did you mainly review the proposal?

On a desktop or laptop computer
On a phone
On a tablet
Printed it out

Q04

평점 척도필수

How easy was it to navigate and understand the online proposal itself (sections, pricing tables, attachments)?

범위: 1 – 5

최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy

Q05

의견 척도필수

How clear was the pricing and scope of work laid out in the proposal?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Very unclear최대:Completely clear

Q06

매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about the proposal you received?

4개 행 × 5개 열

It looked professional and well put-together
It gave me confidence in this company's ability to deliver
It answered my questions without needing to ask follow-ups
It made comparing options (packages, add-ons) easy

열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree

Q07

객관식

About how long did it take you to reach a decision after receiving the proposal?

Same day
A few days
About a week
More than two weeks
I still haven't decided

Q08

순위 매기기필수

Rank the factors below by how much they influenced your decision, from most to least important.

Price
Timeline / delivery date
References or past work shown
Clarity of scope
How the proposal looked and felt
Communication with the sender

드래그하여 순위 지정

Q09

AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the real story behind this respondent's decision: what specifically in the proposal (pricing, scope, timeline, presentation) tipped them toward accepting, declining, or staying undecided. If they requested changes or are still deciding, probe exactly what is missing or unclear and what would need to happen next. Anchor questions on concrete details from the proposal rather than general impressions.

Q10

의견 척도필수

Based on this proposal experience, how likely are you to recommend working with this company to a colleague?

척도: 0 – 10

최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely

Q11

장문형

What, if anything, would have made the proposal more compelling or easier to say yes to?

Q12

객관식

Which best describes your role in this decision?

Final decision-maker
Key influencer / recommender
Evaluating on behalf of someone else
Other
Prefer not to say

Q13

객관식

What's the approximate size of your organization?

Just me / solo
2-10 employees
11-50 employees
51-200 employees
201-1000 employees
1000+ employees
Prefer not to say

Q14

메시지

That's everything — thank you for the honest feedback! Your answers will be used to make future proposals clearer and easier to say yes to.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Goes beyond a satisfaction rating with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual reasoning behind an accept, decline, or stall — not just what respondents rate, but why.
Includes a ranking exercise that forces respondents to prioritize the specific factors (price, clarity, trust signals, etc.) that drove their decision, giving sales and proposal teams actionable weightings.
Pairs structured measures — navigation ease rating, pricing/scope clarity, a multi-statement agreement matrix, and decision-timeline questions — with an open-ended 'what would have made it more compelling' question and a final recommendation score for a full before/after picture.
Segments by decision role and organization size so proposal-software and agency teams can see whether friction points differ for economic buyers vs. influencers, or SMB vs. enterprise recipients.

SurveySparrow

Online Proposal Form Template

This is a static, fielding-ready form template focused on collecting proposal details rather than reconstructing recipient decision-making. It's a solid starting point for basic proposal feedback collection but relies on fixed question sets with no adaptive follow-up. Best suited for teams that just need a quick structured form rather than a deeper post-decision investigation.

잘하는 점

Ready-to-use, purpose-built template specifically for the proposal use case
Simple setup likely aligned with SurveySparrow's broader survey/form builder ecosystem
Accessible template gallery entry point for teams unfamiliar with proposal feedback surveys

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI probing — respondents answer fixed questions with no follow-up that adjusts to their specific answer or outcome
No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for richer qualitative context
No published methodology or per-response quality scoring, so it's unclear how response depth or reliability is assessed

자주 묻는 질문