Participant Preferences for Anonymized Data Sharing & Licensing
Measures research participants' comfort with anonymized data sharing, preferred licensing models, repository preferences, and required safeguards. Designed for IRB-compliant studies where researchers need informed consent data on secondary data use.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How familiar are you with Creative Commons or other data-sharing licenses?
- Very familiar
- Somewhat familiar
- Heard of them but not sure what they mean
- Not familiar at all
How comfortable are you with sharing anonymized data from this study with other researchers?
If this anonymized dataset were shared, which license type would you most prefer?
- CC BY (attribution required)
- CC BY-NC (non-commercial use only)
- CC0 (no restrictions / public domain)
- Other (please specify)
- Not sure / no preference
Please rank the following repository types in order of your preference for depositing this anonymized dataset (1 = most preferred).
- Institutional repository (university/organization)
- Domain/discipline-specific repository
- Generalist repository (e.g., Zenodo, Figshare)
- Controlled-access repository (application and review required)
- Private storage (no public sharing)
Which safeguards do you believe should be in place before anonymized data are shared? Select all that apply.
- Data use agreement (DUA) or terms of use
- Access committee review/approval
- Only aggregate or highly de-identified data released
- Embargo period before release
- User authentication (e.g., two-factor authentication)
- Citation and attribution requirements
- Access logs and audit trails
- None of the above
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional conditions, concerns, or thoughts that would affect your comfort with anonymized data sharing and licensing.
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses have been recorded and will be used in aggregate to inform data-sharing policies. If you have any questions, please contact the research team.
Have you previously contributed data to a research study that was later shared or deposited in a public repository?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
How concerned are you about the possibility that anonymized data could be linked back to you (re-identification)?
When choosing a data license, how important is it to you that others must give proper attribution when using the data?
After your data have been deposited in a repository, which best describes your preference for data withdrawal?
- I should be able to request withdrawal at any time
- Withdrawal should be allowed until public release, then no longer possible
- Withdrawal should not be possible after anonymization
- Not sure / it depends on the circumstances
We'd like to explore your views on anonymized data sharing in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Which types of data would you be comfortable sharing in anonymized form? Select all that apply.
- Survey responses
- Interview transcripts (de-identified)
- Audio or video recordings (voice/face removed or altered)
- Physiological or sensor data
- Location or time-stamped activity data
- Code or analysis scripts
- None of the above
How important is it to you that the data cannot be used for commercial purposes?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college / Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate (PhD/EdD)
- Professional degree (MD/JD)
- Prefer not to say
How important is it to you that reuse of the data is as easy and unrestricted as possible for other researchers?
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Not employed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
In which region do you currently reside?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- Oceania
- South America
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Captures nuanced preferences with dedicated opinion-scale items on attribution, commercial use restrictions, and reuse openness -- not just a single yes/no consent checkbox
- Includes a ranking question for repository preferences and multiple-choice items on safeguards and license type, giving researchers structured comparative data for IRB documentation
- Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind stated comfort levels and concerns, producing richer qualitative context than a static form
- Ends with standard demographic classification (age, gender, education, employment, region) alongside an auto-generated report, supporting subgroup analysis for IRB review
Jotform
Personal Data Consent Form TemplateThis is a static consent-capture form for collecting agreement to personal data use, not a research survey exploring licensing preferences or repository choices. It's fielding-ready for basic consent logging but doesn't measure nuanced attitudes toward anonymized data sharing. Useful as a simple signature/checkbox instrument rather than an attitudinal research tool.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for consent capture with a familiar Jotform drag-and-drop builder
- Likely supports e-signatures and quick deployment for basic compliance needs
- Free-tier accessible, low setup effort for simple consent logging
아쉬운 점
- No mechanism to probe participant reasoning or follow up adaptively on stated preferences
- No license-model, repository-ranking, or safeguard questions specific to secondary data use
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
자주 묻는 질문
“Participant Preferences for Anonymized Data Sharing & Licensing” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 21개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome to this survey on anonymized data sharing and licensing. The purpose of this survey is to understand your prefe…” · “How familiar are you with Creative Commons or other data-sharing licenses?” · “How comfortable are you with sharing anonymized data from this study with other researchers?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 21개를 약 10분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Data Retention Policy Comprehension & Usability Survey
Measures how well users understand your data retention policy, evaluates the discoverability and usability of retention-related controls, and identifies preferred communication formats to inform UX and compliance improvements.
템플릿 보기Health Data Sharing Trust & Privacy Preferences Survey
Measures patient comfort, consent preferences, and privacy concerns when sharing health data across providers, insurers, and digital health tools. Ideal for healthcare organizations, privacy teams, and compliance officers seeking to understand patient attitudes toward data sharing.
템플릿 보기Data Residency & Sovereignty Preferences Survey
Measures user and organizational preferences for data storage location, cross-border transfer conditions, and governance trade-offs to inform product policy, compliance strategy, and trust-building initiatives.
템플릿 보기원격 모니터링 및 데이터 공유에 대한 환자 편의성
원격 환자 모니터링(RPM) 기기에 대한 환자 경험, 이해관계자 간 건강 데이터 공유에 대한 편안함, 신뢰 및 동의 선호도, 도입을 위한 지원 요구 사항을 측정합니다.
템플릿 보기Media Release And Consent Preferences Survey
Captures how comfortable people are with having their photo, video, or quote used in marketing, training, or press materials — and under what conditions. The AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind any hesitation so legal and marketing teams know exactly what conditions to honor, not just a yes/no checkbox.
템플릿 보기User Trust & Consent Preferences for Privacy-Preserving Analytics
Measures users' comprehension of privacy-preserving analytics techniques, trust in identity protection, and preferences for consent controls and defaults. Designed for UX researchers and product teams evaluating analytics transparency features.
템플릿 보기