Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Industry-Specific
Politician Statement Reaction & Credibility Survey
Captures how a specific statement from a public official lands with real people — whether they'd heard it, how they interpret it, and what it does to their trust. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each reaction, surfacing the specific words or context driving approval, skepticism, or backlash.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
Before today, had you heard about this statement?
- Yes, I saw or heard it directly (video, audio, or in person)
- Yes, I heard about it secondhand (news, social media, friends)
- No, this is the first I'm hearing of it
Q03
텍스트 하이라이트
Please read the statement below, then highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you — whether they strike you as compelling, concerning, vague, or anything else worth flagging.
"(Replace with the exact quote from the politician, including enough surrounding context to be fair.)" (Template note: paste the verbatim statement and cite the source/date before launching.)
Q04
의견 척도필수
How much do you agree with the sentiment expressed in this statement?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q05
객관식필수
Which of these best describes how the statement came across to you?
- Honest and straightforward
- Somewhat exaggerated
- Misleading
- Taken out of context
- Politically calculated
- I'm not sure
Q06
평점 척도필수
How has this statement affected your trust in this politician?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Much less trust최대:Much more trust
Q07
매트릭스
Thinking about the statement itself, how much do you agree with each of the following?
5개 행 × 5개 열
- It was clear and easy to understand
- It was honest
- It was relevant to issues that matter to me
- It was divisive
- It was consistent with things this politician has said before
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q08
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)
When you form an opinion about a statement like this, which factors matter most to you?
- Tone and delivery
- Factual accuracy
- Timing of the statement
- Media coverage around it
- How it compares to past statements from this politician
- Reactions from other politicians or officials
- How personally relevant it is to me
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to my opinion최악:Matters least to my opinion
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Explore the specific reasoning behind this respondent's reaction to the statement: which words or phrases from the highlighted passage drove their agreement or disagreement, and why. If they rated it as misleading or taken out of context, ask what context they think is missing. If they hadn't heard of the statement before this survey, probe their first impression now that they've read it and what would change their mind.
Q10
객관식
What, if anything, do you think this politician should do next?
- Clarify what they meant
- Apologize
- Stand by the statement
- Provide more context or evidence
- Nothing needs to be done
- Not sure
Q11
객관식
Which best describes your political affiliation?
- Left-leaning
- Center
- Right-leaning
- Independent / none
- Prefer not to say
Q12
드롭다운
What is your age range?
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
That's everything — thank you for your honest reactions. Your responses will be combined with others to build a picture of how this statement is landing with the public and where the biggest reactions are coming from.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Opens by establishing prior awareness of the statement, then uses text highlighting to pinpoint the exact words or phrases driving a respondent's reaction, rather than just capturing a general opinion
- Combines an opinion scale, a matrix of statement-specific agreement items, and a MaxDiff exercise on what factors matter most, giving both breadth and depth on how the statement is being judged
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that explores the specific reasoning behind each respondent's reaction, surfacing why certain wording triggered approval, skepticism, or backlash
- Captures downstream effects (trust rating, what the politician should do next) alongside political affiliation and age, so credibility shifts can be segmented by respondent background
SurveyMonkey
Which Politician Said... Survey TemplateThis is a lighter, quiz-style template built around guessing which politician said a given quote, not a structured instrument for measuring reaction, sentiment, or credibility impact. It's a fielding-ready form on a major platform, but its purpose (engagement/trivia) differs from a credibility research survey. Useful mainly as a reference point for how SurveyMonkey packages politician-statement content, not as a direct substitute.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use template on a widely recognized survey platform
- Simple, quick format likely to drive high completion rates
- Easy to customize question wording and answer choices via a familiar editor
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe the reasoning behind a reaction — it's a static question set
- No mechanism to identify which specific words or phrases in a statement drive a respondent's response
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or transparent methodology reporting
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Industry-Specific
멘토십 지지 및 후원 효과 설문
멘토십 프로그램이 단순한 조언 대화를 넘어 실질적인 지지 — 소개, 추천, 후원 — 를 만들어 내고 있는지를 측정합니다. 프로그램 담당자와 L&D 팀을 위해 설계되었으며, 수치 뒤에 숨겨진 지지의 구체적인 사례(또는 그 부재)를 드러내는 AI 후속 질문을 포함합니다.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Corporate Crisis Response Perception Survey
Measures how customers, employees, and other stakeholders perceived your company's official response to a recent incident or controversy — its clarity, credibility, and effect on trust — with an AI follow-up that uncovers exactly what shaped their reaction. Built for comms, PR, and exec teams evaluating crisis messaging.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Employee Pay Equity & Wage Gap Perception Survey
Measures how fairly employees believe compensation is distributed across gender, race, tenure, and role, and pinpoints which pay decisions or comparisons shape that perception. Built for HR and People Analytics teams auditing pay equity, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the specific story behind a respondent's lowest fairness rating instead of just the number.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Sports Program Registration Experience Survey
Measures how smooth (or frustrating) the sign-up process was for a sports league, camp, or class, what actually drives program choice, and how participants perceive the registration fee — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the specific moment registration got confusing or almost led to abandonment.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Public Attitudes on Gender Equality & Policy Survey
Measures how people perceive progress on gender equality, which policy issues they think deserve attention, and whether they've personally experienced unfair treatment. Built for researchers, advocacy groups, and pollsters tracking public opinion, with an AI follow-up that digs into the personal reasoning and lived experience behind the numbers.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Summer Camp Application Fit & Readiness Survey
Captures why a family is applying, which sessions and activities matter most, and how ready the camper feels for time away from home — with an AI follow-up that surfaces unspoken worries or hopes so counselors can prep the right support before day one.
템플릿 보기