Shared Prompt Library: Discovery & Reuse Experience Survey
Assesses how users find, customize, and derive value from a shared AI prompt library. Use this to identify discovery friction, reuse patterns, and outcome perceptions to prioritize product improvements.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Have you used one or more shared prompts from the library in the past 30 days?
- Yes
- No
In the last 30 days, how often did you use shared prompts from the library?
- Multiple times a day
- About once a day
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- Less than once a week
Where do you usually find shared prompts you try or reuse? Select all that apply.
- In-product gallery or browse
- Search results
- Home page or recommendations
- From teammates or community
- External links or articles
- Templates or starter packs
- Direct share from a colleague
- Other (please specify)
When you reuse a shared prompt, what do you typically do?
- Use it exactly as-is
- Make small edits (minor wording or parameters)
- Heavily customize it for my context
- Use it as inspiration only
- Other (please specify)
Using shared prompts has improved the quality of my AI outputs.
What one or two improvements would most enhance your experience discovering and reusing shared prompts?
Which best describes your primary role?
- Engineering / Developer
- Data / ML
- Product / Design / UX
- Operations / IT
- Marketing / Sales
- Support / Service
- Education / Research
- Other (please specify)
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to the shared prompt library. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.
Approximately how many distinct shared prompts did you reuse in the last 30 days?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21 or more
How easy or difficult is it to find a suitable shared prompt when you need one?
After finding a useful shared prompt, which of the following do you typically do? Select all that apply.
- Save or favorite it
- Add to a collection or folder
- Copy into my personal library
- Share it with others
- Follow updates or new versions
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Using shared prompts has saved me time compared to writing prompts from scratch.
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your experience with shared prompts in a bit more depth. Please share any additional thoughts about what works well, what frustrates you, or what you'd change—our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
How many people are in your organization?
- 1 (Just me)
- 2–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
Shared prompts in the library are named clearly enough that I can tell what they do.
Of the last 5 new shared prompts you tried, how many did you end up reusing?
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- I haven't tried 5 new prompts yet
Shared prompts have helped me achieve more consistent results across tasks.
Which best describes your organization type?
- Startup
- Small / Medium business
- Enterprise
- Non-profit
- Government
- Education
- Other (please specify)
I can quickly assess whether a shared prompt will produce good results for my task.
Overall, how would you rate the impact of shared prompts on your productivity?
How long have you been using shared prompts?
- Less than 1 month
- 1–3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–2 years
- More than 2 years
The metadata provided (tags, descriptions, examples) helps me evaluate shared prompts before trying them.
Rank the following barriers to finding shared prompts from biggest blocker (top) to smallest (bottom).
- Too many results to sift through
- Search doesn't surface what I need
- Unclear or inconsistent naming
- Low or variable content quality
- Hard to tell if a prompt fits my task
- Lack of metadata (tags, examples)
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Evaluation Fairness & Representation Perceptions Survey for Developers
Measures software developers' perceptions of fairness, bias, and representativeness in their evaluation practices. Ideal for engineering leadership and DEI teams seeking to identify gaps in evaluation methodology and build more inclusive processes.
템플릿 보기AI Error Reporting Friction & Trust Impact Survey
Measures how AI users experience error reporting workflows and how unresolved issues affect trust and future reporting intent. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to reduce reporting friction and improve AI reliability perceptions.
템플릿 보기AI Error Tolerance & Recovery Experience Survey
Measures user experiences with AI errors, recovery preferences, and resulting trust impact. Designed for AI product teams seeking to prioritize reliability improvements and reduce error-driven churn.
템플릿 보기온디바이스 AI 학습: 소비자 신뢰 및 프라이버시 인식
온디바이스 AI 학습에 대한 소비자 인지도, 신뢰, 프라이버시 우려, 채택 의향을 측정합니다. 사용자가 로컬 AI 학습 기능을 어떻게 인식하고 평가하는지 이해하고자 하는 제품, UX, 프라이버시 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기데이터 라벨링 QA, 편향성 및 지침 명확성 감사
데이터 라벨링 팀을 위한 운영 감사 설문으로, 지난 30일간의 지침 명확성, 편향 완화 관행, QA 엄격성, 워크플로 병목 현상을 측정합니다. 라벨러, 리뷰어, QA 리드를 대상으로 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기AI 변경 로그의 명확성 및 도입 영향 조사
사용자가 AI 제품 변경 로그의 명확성, 유용성, 행동적 영향을 어떻게 인식하는지 측정합니다. 릴리스 커뮤니케이션을 최적화하고 기능 도입을 촉진하려는 제품 및 개발자 경험 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기