Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Industry-Specific
Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll
Finds the best date, time, and format for an upcoming meeting or event by checking real availability against a shortlist of options — for anyone coordinating a group across busy calendars. The AI follow-up digs into the scheduling conflicts and recurring constraints that a simple poll misses, so organizers don't pick a slot that quietly excludes key people.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
매트릭스필수
How well does each proposed date and time work for you? (Template note: replace these rows with your actual candidate dates/times before sending.)
3개 행 × 3개 열
- (Replace with Option A: e.g., Tue Oct 14, 10:00 AM)
- (Replace with Option B: e.g., Wed Oct 15, 2:00 PM)
- (Replace with Option C: e.g., Thu Oct 16, 9:00 AM)
열: Works great · Could work · Doesn't work
Q03
순위 매기기필수
Of the options above, rank your top choices from most to least preferred.
- (Replace with Option A)
- (Replace with Option B)
- (Replace with Option C)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q04
드롭다운필수
What time zone should we use when scheduling you?
- Pacific (PT)
- Mountain (MT)
- Central (CT)
- Eastern (ET)
- UK / GMT
- Central Europe (CET)
- India (IST)
- China / Singapore (CST/SGT)
- Japan / Korea (JST/KST)
- Other
Q05
객관식
What meeting format works best for you?
- In person
- Virtual
- Hybrid (some in person, some virtual)
- No strong preference
Q06
객관식
Which days of the week generally work best for you, aside from the specific dates above?
- Monday
- Tuesday
- Wednesday
- Thursday
- Friday
- Saturday
- Sunday
Q07
의견 척도필수
How flexible is your schedule during this window if none of the proposed options end up working?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not flexible at all최대:Extremely flexible
Q08
의견 척도
How important is it to you personally that this meeting happens?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not important at all최대:Extremely important
Q09
단문형
Any recurring conflicts or constraints we should know about (e.g., standing meetings, school pickup, travel)?
Q10
AI 인터뷰
Probe the respondent's real availability behind their ratings: for any date/time they marked 'Could work' or 'Doesn't work,' find out exactly what the conflict is and whether it's fixed or movable. If they flagged low flexibility, dig into what specifically would need to change for them to attend, and whether there's a fallback slot they haven't mentioned. If they marked everything as working perfectly, sanity-check by asking about recurring commitments they might have overlooked.
Q11
객관식
Which team or department are you scheduling on behalf of? (Template note: replace with your actual team list.)
- (Replace with Team/Department A)
- (Replace with Team/Department B)
- (Replace with Team/Department C)
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
Thanks for sharing your availability! We'll use everyone's responses to lock in the final date and send a calendar invite shortly.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasons behind low-availability ratings and uncovers recurring scheduling conflicts a static poll would miss
- Combines a matrix rating of each proposed date/time with a ranked preference question, so organizers get both granularity and a clear tiebreaker
- Captures time zone, meeting format, and general day-of-week preferences alongside the specific date options, reducing the risk of picking a slot that quietly excludes key people
- Uses opening and closing chat messages plus opinion-scale questions on flexibility and meeting importance to add context AI templates can't gather
Jotform
Scheduling Poll Form TemplateA ready-to-field static form for collecting availability from a group, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers the basics of gathering date/time preferences but doesn't probe deeper into why a respondent marked a slot as unavailable. Good for simple polls, less suited to uncovering hidden scheduling conflicts.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template within a widely used form builder
- Likely supports easy customization of date/time fields and branding
- Part of a broad template library with integrations (payments, notifications, etc.)
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore conflicts behind low-availability answers
- No automated quality scoring of responses
- No transparent, published methodology for how the form logic was designed
SurveyMonkey
Online Scheduling Poll TemplateA standard survey template for polling group availability, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and reporting. It's a fielding-ready poll but relies on fixed multiple-choice/matrix-style questions rather than any conversational probing. Reporting is likely solid for aggregate results but not tailored to individual respondent nuance.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
- Likely offers clean aggregate visualizations of availability across respondents
- Simple, familiar poll format for quick group scheduling
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into recurring constraints or conflicts
- No voice interview or guided task option for richer context
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Typeform
Scheduling Poll Form TemplateA conversational-style, fielding-ready form for collecting meeting availability, leveraging Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UX. It's more engaging to fill out than a plain grid but the question flow is still fixed rather than adaptive to individual answers. Useful for simple scheduling polls without deeper conflict discovery.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational UI that likely improves completion rates
- Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup
- Supports logic jumps for basic branching between questions
아쉬운 점
- No true adaptive AI interviewing that follows up based on specific availability answers
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Industry-Specific
New Client Counseling Intake Assessment
A pre-session intake for therapy and counseling practices that captures presenting concerns, symptom frequency, safety screening, and personal goals before the first appointment. An AI follow-up interview explores the client's own account of what's going on and what they hope will change, giving clinicians richer context than checkboxes alone before the first session.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
New Patient Acupuncture Intake Assessment
Captures a new acupuncture patient's health history, presenting complaint, and treatment goals before their first visit, with an AI follow-up that probes the story behind their main complaint the way a practitioner would in an initial consult. Built for acupuncture and TCM clinics streamlining intake paperwork.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
SEO Agency Client Satisfaction & Retention Survey
Measures how SEO clients actually perceive results, reporting clarity, communication, and value from their agency or consultant — for quarterly or renewal-time check-ins. The AI follow-up digs into the real reason behind a client's loyalty score instead of taking the number at face value.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Subscription Box Curation & Retention Survey
Diagnoses what keeps subscribers renewing a recurring box — unboxing experience, product-value fit, and pricing sensitivity — using a best-worst trade-off to prioritize curation levers and an AI follow-up that surfaces the real reason behind a subscriber's renewal or cancel intent. Built for subscription box brands optimizing retention.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Employee Probationary Period Performance Evaluation
A structured manager assessment of how a new hire is performing during their probationary period, covering core competencies, training support, and readiness for confirmed employment. An AI follow-up interview probes the concrete incidents and evidence behind the manager's recommendation rather than just the rating, producing feedback the employee can actually act on.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Hair Salon New Client Intake & Hair History Survey
Captures a new or returning client's hair type, chemical history, sensitivities, and styling goals before their appointment, so stylists arrive prepared instead of guessing. An AI follow-up interview digs into the client's hair story and what 'success' looks like to them, surfacing details a checkbox form would miss.
템플릿 보기