Crypto Wallet Setup & Recovery UX Study
Evaluates user comprehension, confidence, and preferences around non-custodial wallet setup flows, seed phrase recovery, and network fee transparency to identify UX friction points and reduce drop-off.
Perguntas de exemplo
Uma prévia do que há no modelo. Todas as perguntas podem ser editadas antes de publicar.
Have you ever set up a crypto wallet (e.g., MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Ledger)?
- Yes, I have set up a wallet
- No, this would be my first time
- Not sure / Can't remember
To what extent do you agree or disagree: "If I lose my seed phrase and have no other backup, no one—including the wallet company—can recover my funds."
Which recovery approaches have you heard of for non-custodial wallets? Select all that apply.
- Seed phrase (12/24 words) written or stored securely
- Encrypted cloud backup (protected by a password or passkey)
- Hardware device backup (e.g., hardware wallet)
- Social recovery with trusted contacts
- Email/SMS one-time codes
- Device-based recovery (MPC, no seed phrase)
- Custodial recovery by verifying identity with a company
- None of the above
Which best describes your current understanding of network fees (sometimes called 'gas fees') during wallet setup or first use?
- I know when fees occur and who receives them
- I somewhat understand fees but not all the details
- I thought fees were charged by the wallet company
- I did not notice any fees during setup
- I'm unsure
Which setup flow length would you prefer for a new wallet?
- One quick step now; guide me later as needed
- A guided flow of 3–5 concise steps
- A detailed flow of 6–8 steps with explanations
- Not sure
If a wallet app used the setup flow you described as preferred, how likely would you be to complete the entire setup process?
We'd like to explore your wallet setup and recovery experiences in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
Thank you for your time! Your feedback will help improve wallet setup, recovery, and fee transparency for all users.
For this survey, imagine you are setting up a new non-custodial (self-custody) crypto wallet today. If you've done this in the last 12 months, please answer based on your most recent setup experience. Otherwise, answer based on what you would expect from a clear setup flow.
How familiar are you with cryptocurrencies and Web3 concepts?
To what extent do you agree or disagree: "My private keys are stored by the wallet app company and they can reset them for me if needed."
If you had to choose one primary recovery method for a new non-custodial wallet, which would you prefer?
- Seed phrase backup (12/24 words)
- Encrypted cloud backup with password/passkey
- Social recovery with trusted contacts
- Device-based recovery (MPC, no seed phrase)
- Custodial recovery by verifying identity
- I'm not sure yet
Which parts of the wallet setup process feel most confusing or risky to you? Select all that apply.
- Choosing a recovery method
- Writing / storing a seed phrase
- Backing up to cloud storage
- Understanding what is actually backed up
- Estimating or approving network fees
- Linking or restoring on a second device
- App permissions or privacy notices
- Nothing felt confusing or risky
How would you rate your overall confidence in managing a non-custodial wallet on your own?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions for making wallet setup and recovery clearer.
What is your gender?
- Female
- Male
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
To what extent do you agree or disagree: "I understand the difference between a custodial wallet (e.g., Coinbase account) and a non-custodial wallet (e.g., MetaMask)."
How confident are you that you could recover access to your wallet if you lost your phone?
In which country or region do you currently reside?
- United States
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- European Union
- Australia
- India
- Singapore
- Latin America
- Africa
- Other
Please rank the following factors by how important they are to you when choosing a wallet recovery method, from most important to least important.
- Security / robustness
- Ease of use
- Privacy of my data
- Cost / fees
- Speed to recover
- Works across my devices
- No single point of failure (resilience)
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- High school or less
- Some college / Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate / Professional degree
- Other
In your own words, what is a seed phrase and when would you use it?
Which of the following best describes your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
O que está incluído
Acompanhamento com IA
Sondagens adaptativas nas respostas abertas que revelam detalhes que um formulário estático deixaria passar.
Verificações de atenção
Proteções integradas contra respostas apressadas e participantes de baixa qualidade.
Textos escritos por IA
Redação, ordem e ramificações escritas pela IA, ajustadas ao seu objetivo de pesquisa.
Relatório automático
Temas, citações e um resumo em linguagem simples se escrevem sozinhos assim que as respostas chegam.
Por que este modelo
Para que este modelo foi feito: não encontramos nenhum modelo diretamente comparável em outras ferramentas de pesquisa.
O que o diferencia
- Combines structured opinion-scale and multiple-choice questions on seed phrase understanding, private key custody, and network fee comprehension with an adaptive AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper into individual answers in real time
- Includes an open-text question asking respondents to explain a seed phrase in their own words, giving richer qualitative signal on comprehension gaps than closed-ended forms alone
- Captures preference data via ranking and multiple-choice questions on setup flow length and recovery method, plus a dedicated question on which parts of setup feel most confusing or risky
- Pairs quantitative confidence/familiarity scales with a final open-text reflection and demographic questions, then rolls everything into an automated report with transparent, reviewable AI prompts
Perguntas frequentes
Quais perguntas estão no modelo “Crypto Wallet Setup & Recovery UX Study”?
O modelo inclui 25 perguntas prontas para usar, começando por: “Thank you for participating in this study about crypto wallet setup experiences. Your responses are voluntary and confi…” · “Have you ever set up a crypto wallet (e.g., MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Ledger)?” · “To what extent do you agree or disagree: "If I lose my seed phrase and have no other backup, no one—including the wallet…”. O conjunto completo aparece acima e todas as perguntas podem ser editadas.
Quanto tempo leva para responder a esta pesquisa?
Os participantes normalmente terminam as 25 perguntas em cerca de 11 minutos.
Posso personalizar este modelo?
Sim: cada pergunta, cada opção de resposta e a ordem podem ser editadas antes de publicar. Você pode adicionar ou remover perguntas, ou pedir ao editor com IA para refazer a pesquisa em torno do seu objetivo.
Este modelo é gratuito?
Sim. Abra no editor e comece a personalizar agora: não é preciso criar conta para testar, e o plano gratuito cobre a publicação da sua pesquisa.
Pronto para publicar?
Abra este modelo no editor. Tudo é seu para mudar antes de o primeiro participante ver.
Modelos relacionados
Mais estudos sobre temas semelhantes.
Pesquisa de Experiência de Resolução de Contestação de Cartão de Crédito
Mede a satisfação, o esforço e as dificuldades dos titulares de cartão ao longo de todo o ciclo de contestação — da abertura à resolução — para identificar melhorias no processo e apoiar a retenção.
Ver modeloPesquisa sobre Configuração, Recuperação e Experiência de Transações em Carteiras de Criptomoedas
Avalia o atrito na integração de carteiras de autocustódia, a confiança na recuperação de frases-semente e a clareza das transações on-chain para identificar melhorias de UX. Desenvolvida para equipes de produto de carteiras de criptomoedas com foco em usuários ativos de carteiras.
Ver modeloPesquisa de Atritos na Experiência de Checkout e Pagamento em E-commerce
Diagnostique pontos de atrito ao longo do fluxo de checkout e pagamento em e-commerce—do carrinho à confirmação—para identificar os fatores que levam ao abandono de carrinho e priorizar melhorias de UX que aumentem as taxas de conversão.
Ver modeloPesquisa de UX: Prevenção de Fraude no Checkout vs. Conversão
Mede como os clientes de e-commerce percebem e reagem às etapas de prevenção de fraude durante o checkout, identificando os trade-offs entre atrito de segurança e conversão para orientar a otimização da UX.
Ver modeloAvaliação de Conhecimento e Confiança no Onboarding de Web3
Mede a compreensão de usuários novos e iniciantes de cripto sobre gas fees, redes blockchain e permissões de carteira/dApp, para identificar lacunas de conhecimento e pontos de fricção de UX nos fluxos de onboarding de Web3.
Ver modeloAvaliação de UX de Exclusão, Exportação e Portabilidade de Dados
Avalia as experiências dos usuários com fluxos de exclusão, exportação e portabilidade de dados em serviços digitais. Desenvolvido para pesquisadores de UX e equipes de conformidade que buscam identificar pontos de atrito e aprimorar interfaces de controle de dados.
Ver modelo