All templates
Education & Academic

Post-Study Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment

Assesses whether research participants understood key elements of informed consent—study purpose, risks, data handling, and participant rights. Designed for post-study administration to support IRB compliance and iterative improvement of consent materials.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

29 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome, and thank you for taking part in our study. This short survey (approximately 13 minutes) asks about your experience with the consent information you received before the study. There are no right or wrong answers — we are simply interested in your honest impressions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve our consent materials. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Before starting the study, did you read the consent information provided to you?

  • Yes, thoroughly
  • Yes, I skimmed it
  • I started but did not finish
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
Long Text

In your own words, what was the main purpose of the study you participated in?

Q04
Multiple Choice

To the best of your recollection, how were your study data handled?

  • Anonymous (no identifiers collected)
  • De-identified (coded; no direct identifiers)
  • Identifiable (name or contact info attached)
  • Not sure
Q05
Multiple Choice

Were you provided with contact details for questions or concerns about the study?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q06
Opinion Scale

The consent information was an appropriate length.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q07
Dropdown

What is your age range?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is invaluable and will help us improve our consent materials and the participant experience in future studies. If you have any questions, please contact the research team using the details provided in your consent form.

Q09
Dropdown

Approximately how long did you spend reading the consent information?

  • Less than 1 minute
  • 1–2 minutes
  • 3–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • More than 10 minutes
  • I did not read it
Q10
Opinion Scale

How clear was the study's purpose to you before you began?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all clearMax:Extremely clear
Q11
Multiple Choice

Which of the following best matches what you recall about how your data may be shared?

  • Only the study team could access my data
  • The team and approved collaborators could access my data
  • De-identified data might be shared publicly (e.g., repositories)
  • Data would not be shared beyond the team
  • I don't remember
Q12
Multiple Choice

Do you recall being told how to request that your data be deleted or corrected?

  • Yes, I remember how
  • I was told but don't remember the details
  • I don't recall being told
  • Not sure
Q13
Long Text

Was any information in the consent materials missing, unclear, or in need of improvement? Please explain.

Q14
Multiple Choice

How do you describe your gender? Select all that apply.

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Another gender identity
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
Multiple Choice

Was this your first time participating in a study with this research team?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q16
Opinion Scale

How clearly were the potential risks of the study explained to you?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all clearlyMax:Very clearly
Q17
Multiple Choice

What do you recall about how long your data will be retained?

  • Only during data analysis
  • For several years
  • Indefinitely
  • I don't remember
Q18
Opinion Scale

I understood that I could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q19
AI Interview

We'd like to understand your experience with the consent process in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q20
Dropdown

In which region do you currently reside?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • South America
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
Multiple Choice

Based on what you were told, what level of risk did this study pose to you?

  • None
  • Minimal
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Not sure
Q22
Opinion Scale

How confident are you that your data will be kept confidential as described in the consent information?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q23
Opinion Scale

I understood that I had the right to ask questions about the study at any point.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q24
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about the consent information or your study experience?

Q25
Multiple Choice

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college / Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctoral or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
Opinion Scale

I was clearly informed about any compensation or incentives for participating.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q27
Multiple Choice

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Not employed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
Multiple Choice

To what extent did payment or incentives influence your decision to participate?

  • Not at all
  • A little
  • Somewhat
  • A lot
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
Multiple Choice

Have you previously participated in academic research at any institution?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Directly tests comprehension of purpose, risks, data handling, and rights with dedicated opinion-scale and multiple-choice items rather than just collecting a signature
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes participants' understanding of the consent process in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice recall questions
  • Open-text items capture verbatim participant explanations of study purpose and flag any consent materials that were unclear or incomplete, directly supporting iterative consent-form improvement
  • Captures prior research experience and demographic context so IRBs can check whether comprehension varies across participant subgroups

Jotform

Research Informed Consent Form Template

This is a pre-study consent FORM used to obtain and document a participant's agreement to join a study, not a post-study instrument for checking whether they actually understood what they agreed to. It's a fielding-ready static form, well suited for the consent-collection step but not for measuring comprehension afterward. Teams would need a separate instrument (like this one) to verify understanding and support IRB reporting.

What it does well

  • Quick to deploy for the consent-signing step of a study
  • Customizable form fields and layout typical of Jotform's builder
  • Likely supports e-signature/acknowledgment capture for compliance records

Where it falls short

  • Collects a signed agreement rather than testing whether participants understood purpose, risks, data handling, or rights
  • Static form with no adaptive follow-up questioning or voice AI interview to probe understanding
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or generated comprehension report for IRB review

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Education & Academic

Course Communication & Support Effectiveness Survey

Measures student perceptions of messaging timeliness, channel preference, and support quality in online or fintech cohort programs to identify actionable communication improvements.

View template
Education & Academic

Mixed-Methods Integration Quality Assessment

A team-level diagnostic for mixed-methods research projects, evaluating convergence, divergence, and integration rigor across qualitative and quantitative strands to guide analytic next steps.

View template
Education & Academic

Student Perceptions of Certificates & Microcredentials

Measures student awareness, perceived value, enrollment drivers, outcomes, and barriers related to certificates and microcredentials. Designed for higher-education and online-learning researchers seeking actionable segmentation and intent data.

View template
Education & Academic

Longitudinal Study Attrition & Retention Diagnostic

Diagnoses why participants miss or consider skipping follow-up time points in longitudinal research, and identifies actionable levers—reminders, incentives, burden reduction—to improve retention and compliance.

View template
Education & Academic

Student Internship Support & Learning Outcomes Survey

Measures the quality of institutional internship support, supervision quality, and skill development outcomes to guide program improvement for higher education administrators and career services teams.

View template
Education & Academic

Post-Launch Feature Awareness Pulse Survey

Measures awareness decay of recently launched features across user segments, identifying which communication channels sustain visibility and where messaging drop-offs occur post-launch.

View template