AI Agent Autonomy, Escalation & Control Preferences Survey
Measures user expectations for AI agent autonomy, preferred escalation and handoff mechanisms, permissible actions, spending thresholds, and risk concerns. Designed for UX researchers and product teams building agentic AI workflows.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the past 30 days, how often have you used any AI assistant (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Siri, Alexa)?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- A few times this month
- I have not used an AI assistant
The next few questions ask about specific behaviors an AI agent might exhibit. For each, please rate how important that behavior is to you.
By default, how much autonomy should an AI agent have when performing tasks in your workflow?
What concerns, if any, do you have about AI agents? (Select all that apply.)
- Privacy or data leakage
- Inaccuracies (hallucinations)
- Bias or unfair outcomes
- Security vulnerabilities
- Compliance or legal risk
- Unexpected costs or overuse
- Loss of personal skill or over-reliance
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
Overall, how much do you trust AI agents to carry out tasks on your behalf?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you'd like to share about your expectations or preferences for AI agents?
Finally, a few optional questions about you to help us understand patterns across different groups.
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to help improve AI agent design for everyone.
How important is it that an AI agent explains its reasoning before taking action?
When an AI agent is unsure about the correct action or detects a potential risk, what should it do first?
- Pause and escalate to a human immediately
- Ask me to review and approve the specific action
- Flag the uncertainty but continue with its best judgment
- Continue autonomously unless I intervene
- Other (please specify)
We'd like to explore your experiences with AI agents in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about situations where an AI agent met or fell short of your expectations.
What is your age range?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent asks for your confirmation before performing irreversible actions?
If an AI agent escalates an issue to a human, which handoff method(s) would you prefer? (Select all that apply.)
- Live chat with a human agent
- Open a support ticket
- Email a specialist
- Phone call
- Schedule a callback
- Forward to my team or shared inbox
- Other (please specify)
In which region do you primarily live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent cites sources or evidence for its claims?
What is the maximum amount you would allow an AI agent to spend on a single purchase without your approval?
- $0 – always require my approval
- $1–$25
- $26–$100
- $101–$500
- $501–$1,000
- More than $1,000
- Not applicable – my agent would not make purchases
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or vocational training
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent learns and improves from your corrections over time?
During longer tasks, how often should the AI agent send you status updates?
- Only when the task is complete
- At major milestones or decision points
- At regular intervals (e.g., every few minutes)
- After every individual step
- I don't need status updates
What is your current employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Not employed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent stays strictly within the scope of tasks you have assigned?
Which of the following actions, if any, should an AI agent be allowed to perform without asking you first? (Select all that apply.)
- Draft but do not send messages
- Send emails to internal recipients
- Schedule calendar events
- Browse and read web pages
- Access non-sensitive files
- Run code in a sandbox
- Create tickets or tasks
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Entertainment Chatbot Engagement & Satisfaction Survey
Measures how often people use an entertainment chatbot (companionship, roleplay, humor, storytelling), what keeps them coming back, and where the experience falls flat — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific memorable conversation to surface what actually made it feel fun, believable, or disappointing. Built for product and content teams shipping character or entertainment-focused AI experiences.
View templateFlight Booking Chatbot Usability & Trust Survey
Evaluates how well an airline or travel site's AI chatbot handles real booking, change, and support tasks — covering task completion, trust, and where users bail out to a human. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened in the respondent's most recent chatbot session, not just how they'd rate it in hindsight.
View templateDoctor Appointment Chatbot Experience Survey
Measures how well an AI scheduling chatbot helps patients book, reschedule, or get answers about medical appointments, covering task completion, trust, and friction points — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment the chatbot helped or failed.
View templateAI Tool Adoption in Research Teams
A survey studying how research teams evaluate, adopt, and integrate AI tools for data collection, analysis, and reporting. This instrument measures current tool usage, evaluation criteria, adoption barriers, training experiences, data quality perceptions, and team collaboration patterns.
View templateAI Adoption in Higher Education
A research survey exploring how faculty and students adopt, perceive, and experience AI tools in higher education settings. Covers current usage patterns, perceived benefits and barriers, institutional policy awareness, training needs, and impact on teaching and learning outcomes.
View templateAI Refusal Message Clarity & Tone Evaluation
A stimulus-comparison survey for UX researchers and AI product teams to evaluate the clarity, tone, and helpfulness of AI safety and refusal messages. Produces actionable data on user preferences and improvement priorities.
View template