AI Error Reporting Friction & Trust Impact Survey
Measures how AI users experience error reporting workflows and how unresolved issues affect trust and future reporting intent. Designed for product and UX teams seeking to reduce reporting friction and improve AI reliability perceptions.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the past 7 days, how often did you use our AI features?
- 0 times
- 1–2 times
- 3–5 times
- 6–10 times
- More than 10 times
In the past 30 days, did you encounter any AI output that was inaccurate, unhelpful, or not working as expected?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
This section asks about your experience reporting the issue. If you did not encounter an issue, you may skip ahead.
Right now, how much do you trust the AI's outputs for your tasks?
Based on your experiences, what would make AI issue reports easier to file and more complete?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time — your feedback helps us improve AI error reporting and follow-up. Your responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate.
What did you mainly use the AI for in the past 7 days? Select all that apply.
- Drafting or writing
- Data analysis
- Brainstorming ideas
- Customer support tasks
- Code assistance
- Research or lookup
- Summarization
- Planning or scheduling
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about your most recent AI issue, did you report it?
- Yes, using the in-product report button
- Yes, I contacted support
- Yes, I posted in a community or forum
- I tried but couldn't complete the report
- No, I didn't report it
Compared to before your most recent AI issue, how has your trust in the AI changed?
We'd like to learn more about your experience with AI errors and how they affect your trust. Please share your thoughts.
Which gender identities do you use? Select all that apply.
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How easy was it to find and complete the error reporting process?
How confident are you using AI assistance for important or high-stakes decisions?
Where do you primarily live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Middle East
- Prefer not to say
What, if anything, made reporting harder? Select all that apply.
- Couldn't find where to report
- Too many steps
- Unsure what information was needed
- Concerned about sharing data
- Report form was buggy
- No time
- Not worth the effort
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
How likely are you to report AI issues you encounter in the future?
What best describes your current role or work context?
- Full-time employee
- Part-time employee
- Self-employed or freelancer
- Student
- Not currently working
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how well did the reporting form allow you to describe the issue you experienced?
After submitting a report, did you receive any follow-up (such as an acknowledgment or resolution)?
- Yes, within 24 hours
- Yes, within 3 days
- Yes, after a week or more
- Not yet
- I did not submit a report
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
AI Error Tolerance & Recovery Experience Survey
Measures user experiences with AI errors, recovery preferences, and resulting trust impact. Designed for AI product teams seeking to prioritize reliability improvements and reduce error-driven churn.
View templateGenerative AI Trust, Safety & Guardrail Preferences Survey
Measures consumer trust in generative AI tools, perceived safety risks, transparency expectations, and guardrail preferences to inform responsible AI product design and policy.
View templateOn-Device AI Training: Consumer Trust & Privacy Perceptions
Measures consumer awareness, trust, privacy concerns, and adoption intentions regarding on-device AI training. Designed for product, UX, and privacy teams seeking to understand how users perceive and evaluate local AI learning features.
View templateEdge AI Governance & Monitoring Maturity Assessment
Assesses organizational readiness across edge AI governance, monitoring, risk, and MLOps practices. Designed for AI/ML leaders, DevOps, and compliance stakeholders to benchmark maturity and prioritize investment.
View templateDeveloper Content Filter False Positive Impact Assessment
Assess how content filter false positives affect developer productivity, workflow disruption, and tool adoption decisions. Designed for developer experience researchers and tooling teams seeking actionable improvement priorities from software practitioners.
View templateAI Bug Bounty: Scope, Fairness & Incentive Evaluation
An internal stakeholder survey evaluating scope clarity, decision fairness, and incentive effectiveness in your AI bug bounty program over the past 6 months to guide program improvements.
View template