Q01
Message
All templatesEducation & Academic
AI Lesson Planning & Grading: Teacher Workload Impact
Measures whether AI lesson-planning and grading tools are actually reducing teacher workload, which tasks see the biggest time savings, and how much teachers trust the output. Built for school and district leaders evaluating AI tool adoption, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a real week to separate genuine time savings from hidden re-work.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
14 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Which types of AI tools have you used for lesson planning or grading in the last month?
- AI lesson planning assistant (e.g., MagicSchool, Diffit)
- AI grading or feedback tool (e.g., Grade genie, Turnitin AI)
- AI rubric or differentiation generator
- General AI chatbot used for drafting materials (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude) (Template note: replace these tool examples with the ones your staff actually use)
- Something else
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how much have AI tools reduced your weekly workload for lesson planning and grading?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:No reduction at allMax:Major reduction
Q04
Number
About how many hours per week do these AI tools save you, compared to doing the same work without them?
Q05
Point AllocationRequired
Thinking about where AI actually saves you time, split 100 points across these tasks based on how much of the time savings comes from each.
- Lesson planning
- Grading and feedback
- Differentiating materials for different students
- Parent or student communication
- Administrative paperwork
Allocate 100 points
Q06
MatrixRequired
How much do you agree with each statement about the AI tools you use?
4 rows × 5 columns
- The AI-generated lesson plans align well with my curriculum standards
- The AI-generated feedback on student work is accurate
- I have to significantly edit AI output before I can use it
- I trust AI grading enough to use it on graded, not just practice, assignments
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
Which of these tasks would benefit most from additional AI support?
- Drafting initial lesson plans
- Creating differentiated materials for different skill levels
- Grading multiple-choice or short-answer assessments
- Writing narrative feedback on essays or open-ended work
- Generating quiz and test questions
- Translating materials for multilingual families
- Flagging students who need extra help based on their work
- Handling routine parent emails
Pick best & worst per setBest:Would help mostWorst:Would help least
Q08
Rating ScaleRequired
Overall, how would you rate the quality of the lesson plans or feedback AI tools generate for you?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Poor, needs heavy editingMax:Excellent, ready to use
Q09
AI Interview
Anchor on the respondent's workload-reduction rating and their trust-in-grading answer. Ask them to walk through one specific recent week: which task actually got faster because of AI, and where AI created extra work, like double-checking or fixing errors. If their workload-reduction rating was low, probe what's blocking bigger savings — tool limitations, school policy, or lack of trust. If they said they trust AI for graded work, ask what safeguards they use before finalizing a grade.
Q10
Multiple Choice
What has gotten in the way of using AI tools more for lesson planning or grading?
- School or district policy restrictions
- Concerns about accuracy or bias in the output
- Cost of tools not covered by my school
- Lack of training on how to use them well
- Concerns about student academic integrity
- I don't see enough time savings to bother
- Nothing — I use them as much as I want to
Q11
Multiple Choice
What subject area do you primarily teach?
- English / Language Arts
- Math
- Science
- Social Studies
- Elective or special subject
- Multiple subjects
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice
What grade level do you primarily teach?
- Elementary (K-5)
- Middle school (6-8)
- High school (9-12)
- Multiple levels
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Multiple Choice
How many years have you been teaching?
- Less than 3 years
- 3-9 years
- 10-19 years
- 20+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q14
Message
That's everything — thank you for the honest answers. Your responses will help school leaders decide which AI tools are worth keeping, dropping, or getting more training on.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a respondent's actual week to distinguish genuine time savings from hidden re-work, rather than relying on self-reported estimates alone
- Uses a constant-sum question to force teachers to allocate where AI actually saves time across specific tasks, plus a max-diff ranking of which tasks most need more AI support
- Combines a numeric estimate of hours saved with a matrix of trust/agreement statements and a rating of output quality, giving leaders both quantitative and attitudinal signal on AI grading tools
- Captures teaching context (subject, grade level, years teaching) and barriers to adoption so district leaders can segment results by who benefits most and what's blocking wider use
QuestionPro
Course evaluation sample questions and survey templateThis is a general course/teacher evaluation template aimed at gathering student feedback on instruction quality, not an AI-tool workload or adoption survey. It's a fielding-ready static template within the same broad education-survey space, but its questions don't touch AI lesson-planning or grading tools at all. Useful mainly as a point of comparison for general survey design quality in education, not as a direct substitute.
What it does well
- Established, education-specific survey template library
- Likely covers standard course/instructor evaluation dimensions (clarity, engagement, fairness) educators expect
- Backed by a broader survey platform with reporting and analytics features
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe individual responses or reconstruct actual behavior/time use
- Not designed to measure AI tool adoption, time savings, or trust in AI-generated output — different subject matter entirely
- As a static form, cannot distinguish self-reported perception from verified real-world workload impact the way a reconstructed-week interview can
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “AI Lesson Planning & Grading: Teacher Workload Impact” template?
The template includes 14 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes for this! We're trying to understand how AI tools for lesson planning and grading are ac…” · “Which types of AI tools have you used for lesson planning or grading in the last month?” · “Overall, how much have AI tools reduced your weekly workload for lesson planning and grading?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 14 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Education & Academic
Parent Attitudes Toward AI Tutors For Their Children
Measures how comfortable, trusting, and price-sensitive parents are about AI tutoring tools for their kids — covering current usage, top concerns, feature priorities, and willingness to pay. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific worry or hesitation behind each parent's answers, surfacing what would actually change their mind.
View templateEducation & Academic
Educator AI Adoption, Policy & Classroom Impact Survey
Measures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.
View templateEducation & Academic
AI Tutor Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes Survey
Measures how effectively an AI tutor supports student comprehension, engagement, and skill growth, for educators and edtech teams evaluating tutoring tools, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a recent tutoring session to surface what helped or confused the student.
View templateEducation & Academic
Faculty Perspectives on AI in Grading & Assessment
An academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
View templateEducation & Academic
Teacher Workload & Automation Readiness Assessment
A structured instrument for school and district leaders to quantify educator administrative burden, identify top time sinks, and assess readiness for workflow automation. Designed for K–12 teaching staff and instructional support roles.
View templateEducation & Academic
Instructor Readiness for AI Integration
This survey assesses instructor preparedness to integrate artificial intelligence into teaching, covering technology proficiency, AI literacy, pedagogical confidence, institutional support, professional development needs, and workload concerns. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
View template