Do you currently hold a teaching role (full-time, part-time, or adjunct) at a college or university?
- Yes
- No
This survey assesses instructor preparedness to integrate artificial intelligence into teaching, covering technology proficiency, AI literacy, pedagogical confidence, institutional support, professional development needs, and workload concerns. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
This is a general-purpose PD needs assessment template, not one focused specifically on AI readiness or instructor technology proficiency. It's a fielding-ready static form that could be adapted but would need significant editing to cover AI literacy, workload concerns, or institutional AI support. Good for basic PD topic/format preference gathering, but shallower than a purpose-built AI readiness instrument.
A broader professional development survey template rather than one designed around AI integration readiness specifically. It's a fixed, fielding-ready question set suitable for general training feedback, but would require heavy customization to capture AI literacy, pedagogical confidence with AI, or workload/time-cost concerns. Useful as a generic PD benchmarking tool rather than an AI-readiness diagnostic.
The template includes 25 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Do you currently hold a teaching role (full-time, part-time, or adjunct) at a college or university?” · “Welcome to the Instructor AI Readiness Survey. This survey explores your experiences with technology and artificial int…” · “How often do you use digital technology tools (e.g., learning management systems, presentation software, online collabor…”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
Respondents typically finish the 25 questions in about 11 minutes.
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
More studies on similar topics.
A research survey examining how AI tools are reshaping academic integrity norms among college and university students. Covers policy awareness, personal usage patterns, acceptability perceptions, peer behavior observations, and policy recommendations.
View templateMeasures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.
View templateA validated self-assessment instrument measuring undergraduate AI literacy across five dimensions: conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, and awareness of limitations. Estimated completion time: 10-12 minutes.
View templateAn academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.
View templateAn academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
View templateMeasures whether AI lesson-planning and grading tools are actually reducing teacher workload, which tasks see the biggest time savings, and how much teachers trust the output. Built for school and district leaders evaluating AI tool adoption, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a real week to separate genuine time savings from hidden re-work.
View template