DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey
Measures member satisfaction with proposal processes, voting experience, and treasury transparency in decentralized communities. Designed to identify participation barriers, trust gaps, and priority improvements for governance leads.
No sign-up to try · Unlimited responses on the free plan
Welcome to the DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey. This survey takes approximately 13 minutes and asks about your experience with proposals, voting, and treasury transparency over the last 3 months. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to improve community governance. By continuing, you consent to participate.
Powered by QuestionPunk
Default theme. Colors and fonts are yours to change.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the last 3 months, how often have you actively contributed to this community?
- Weekly or more
- About monthly
- A few times
- Not in the last 3 months
Which types of contributions have you made in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.
- Code or technical work
- Proposal authoring
- Proposal feedback/discussion
- Voting participation
- Documentation or education
- Community moderation
- Design/UX
- Operations/project management
- Treasury/finance work
- Other (please specify)
What were the main reasons you have not contributed in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.
- Lack of time
- Unclear where to start
- I felt my input would not matter
- Too many proposals/threads to follow
- Discussions felt unwelcoming
- Other priorities outside the community
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about proposals in the last 3 months, please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement: Proposals are clearly written and easy to understand.
There is enough time to review and discuss proposals before a vote is called.
Community feedback is meaningfully incorporated into proposals before they go to a vote.
The proposal process is accessible to members regardless of technical expertise.
What is the single most important change that would improve the proposal process in the next quarter?
In the last 3 months, did you vote on any proposals?
- Yes
- No
How clear were the voting instructions and options in the last 3 months?
How confident are you that your votes were recorded and counted correctly?
To what extent do you agree or disagree: I am satisfied with the fairness of recent voting outcomes.
What were the main reasons you did not vote in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.
- Missed the voting window
- Unclear process or tools
- Too many proposals to evaluate
- Low perceived impact of my vote
- Technical issues (wallet/app)
- Conflicts of interest concerns
- Other (please specify)
To what extent do you agree or disagree: Overall, treasury activity has been transparent in the last 3 months.
Have you read a treasury report or budget update in the last 3 months?
- Yes
- No
Treasury reports are easy to understand.
Treasury reports are published frequently enough.
Treasury reports clearly link spending to approved proposals.
Please rank the following treasury transparency improvements from most to least important.
- More frequent updates
- Simpler summaries/visuals
- Deeper line-item detail
- Clearer links to approved proposals
- Independent audits/attestations
- Better notifications/alerts
How much do you trust the overall governance process today?
How likely are you to recommend participating in this community's governance to a peer?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions for improving governance in this community.
We'd like to learn more about your governance experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
Which roles do you identify with in this community? Select all that apply.
- Developer/Engineer
- Researcher/Analyst
- Delegate
- Token holder
- Contributor/Reviewer
- Community moderator/manager
- Operations/Project management
- Designer/UX
- Treasury/Finance
- Other (please specify)
How long have you been involved with this community?
- Under 3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–2 years
- More than 2 years
Which region do you primarily participate from?
- Americas
- Europe / Middle East / Africa
- Asia-Pacific
- Prefer not to say
What is your primary language for community participation?
- English
- Spanish
- Chinese (Mandarin)
- Portuguese
- French
- Japanese
- Korean
- Russian
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Are you currently a delegated voter (i.e., you vote on behalf of others)?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
Thank you for your time and insights! Your feedback will be used to improve community governance. Results will be shared in aggregate with the community.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Purpose-built for DAO governance, not generic membership: dedicated blocks on proposal clarity, review time, and whether feedback is incorporated before a vote is called
- Covers the full governance funnel in one flow — contribution frequency and barriers, voting confidence and perceived fairness, and treasury report readability/frequency, ending with a ranking of treasury transparency improvements
- Includes an AI follow-up interview segment so members can explain in their own words why they didn't vote or contribute, going beyond fixed-choice barrier lists
- Transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring give governance leads an auditable, ready-to-share report rather than raw export data
QuestionPro
Non Profit Member Satisfaction Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample-questionnaire guide for nonprofit membership organizations rather than a DAO- or web3-specific instrument, so proposal, voting, and treasury-transparency questions have to be built from scratch. It's a reasonable starting point for general member-satisfaction wording but not fielding-ready for decentralized governance out of the box.
What it does well
- Established survey platform with broad question-bank support for membership organizations
- Provides sample questionnaire text as a starting point rather than a blank page
- Applicable to general nonprofit/community contexts beyond a single use case
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe low satisfaction or non-participation answers
- No DAO-specific coverage of proposal process, on-chain voting confidence, or treasury reporting
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized into a report
Typeform
Member Satisfaction Survey TemplateA conversational, one-question-at-a-time member satisfaction template aimed at general membership communities rather than decentralized governance specifically. Good for a polished respondent experience, but it doesn't address proposal review time, vote-counting trust, or treasury transparency, so it would need heavy customization for a DAO context.
What it does well
- Clean, conversational form UI that's generally easy to complete on mobile
- Simple to duplicate and re-brand for a generic community membership survey
- Well-known platform with straightforward embedding/sharing options
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option — respondents get the same static question sequence regardless of answers
- No built-in items on proposal process, voting confidence, or treasury reporting specific to on-chain governance
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey” template?
The template includes 28 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “In the last 3 months, how often have you actively contributed to this community?” · “Which types of contributions have you made in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.” · “What were the main reasons you have not contributed in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 28 questions in about 13 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.






