Executive Director Annual Performance Evaluation
A confidential board-administered review of the Executive Director's leadership, financial stewardship, fundraising, staff culture, and governance partnership. Combines multi-area rating batteries, a prioritization exercise, and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating and contract recommendation, giving the board a richer picture than scores alone.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Rate the Executive Director's performance in each area below, from a significant gap to outstanding.
- Strategic leadership and vision-setting
- Financial management and fiscal oversight
- Fundraising and resource development
- Staff leadership and organizational culture
- Support for board governance and decision-making
- +1 more
How much do you agree with each statement about the Executive Director's day-to-day working relationship with the board?
- Provides the board with timely, accurate information for decision-making
- Proactively flags risks, problems, or bad news rather than waiting to be asked
- Follows through on commitments made to the board
- Models the organization's stated values in their own conduct
Overall, how effectively is the Executive Director leading (Replace with Organization Name) toward its mission right now?
Compared to one year ago, how would you describe the Executive Director's performance?
- Declined significantly
- Declined somewhat
- Stayed about the same
- Improved somewhat
- Improved significantly
- I wasn't on the board / can't compare
Which of these areas is most important for the Executive Director to focus on developing over the next year, and which is least important right now?
- Strategic planning and vision-setting
- Financial oversight and budgeting discipline
- Fundraising strategy and donor cultivation
- Staff development and organizational culture
- Board communication and partnership
- Succession and leadership pipeline planning
- Community and external relations
- Change management and innovation
Based on current performance, what is your recommendation regarding the Executive Director's contract or continued tenure?
- Renew without conditions
- Renew with a formal development plan
- Extend probation / revisit in 6 months
- Do not renew
- I don't have enough information to recommend
What should the Executive Director start doing, stop doing, and continue doing to be more effective in the next year? Please be as specific as possible.
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall effectiveness rating and contract recommendation: ask for a specific recent example that anchors their score, what the Executive Director could have done differently in that situation, and how the board could better support them. If the respondent indicated a decline in performance or recommended anything short of unconditional renewal, dig into what changed, when it started, and whether it's an isolated incident or a pattern. If they say they don't have enough information, ask what would help them assess the Executive Director's performance better next cycle.
How long have you served on the board?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-6 years
- 7+ years
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your role on the board?
- Board chair
- Committee chair
- Board officer (e.g., treasurer, secretary)
- General board member
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. The board chair will compile all responses into a confidential summary used to guide the Executive Director's development plan and the board's own governance practices.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes multi-area rating batteries (slider matrix and agreement matrix) covering leadership, financial stewardship, fundraising, staff culture, and governance partnership in one instrument
- Adds a max-diff prioritization exercise so the board can rank which focus areas matter most, not just rate them in isolation
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind the overall effectiveness rating and contract recommendation, surfacing context static forms can't capture
- Closes with a long-text start/stop/continue prompt plus board-role and tenure questions, so qualitative feedback and respondent context are captured alongside the scores
Jotform
Executive Director Evaluation Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form builder template for evaluating an Executive Director, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop form editor and integrations. It's a static questionnaire rather than an interactive interview, so all follow-up on ambiguous or noteworthy answers would need to happen manually. Good for quick deployment but limited for probing the 'why' behind ratings.
What it does well
- Easy to customize within Jotform's widely-used form builder
- Likely supports common field types (rating scales, text, multiple choice) out of the box
- Can integrate with Jotform's broader ecosystem (e-signatures, notifications, storage)
Where it falls short
- Static form with no adaptive follow-up questioning based on individual responses
- No built-in per-response quality scoring
- No transparent, published methodology for how questions were designed or how prompts work
SurveySparrow
Executive Director Evaluation Form TemplateA conversational-style survey template for ED evaluation, leveraging SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel more engaging than a traditional grid. It remains a fixed-question survey, however, with no mechanism to dynamically dig deeper into a respondent's stated rationale. Best suited for organizations wanting a friendlier front-end than a raw form.
What it does well
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface can improve completion rates
- Supports typical rating and open-text question types
- Part of a broader survey platform with reporting dashboards
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interviewing to follow up on individual answers in real time
- No voice-based interview option
- No published, transparent prompt methodology behind question generation
Typeform
Executive Director Evaluation FormA polished, conversational form template from Typeform aimed at ED performance reviews, known for its clean design and one-question-per-screen flow. Like other form builders, it presents a fixed question set to every respondent regardless of their answers. It's a solid template for gathering structured feedback but not built for open-ended, adaptive follow-up.
What it does well
- Visually appealing, well-known conversational form format
- Simple to customize question wording and branding
- Good mobile completion experience
Where it falls short
- No adaptive follow-up interviewing—every respondent sees the same static question set
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No guided screen-share tasks or voice interview option
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Executive Director Annual Performance Evaluation” template?
The template includes 12 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thank you for taking part in (Replace with Organization Name)'s annual review of our Executive Director. Your honest, sp…” · “Rate the Executive Director's performance in each area below, from a significant gap to outstanding.” · “How much do you agree with each statement about the Executive Director's day-to-day working relationship with the board?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 12 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation
Evaluates how well a team communicates, makes decisions, shares workload, and supports its members — straight from the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR running regular team health checks, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind whatever obstacle or low score members flagged, not just the number they gave it.
View templateDistrict Executive Leadership Competency Assessment
Gathers 360-style feedback on how a District Executive (DE) or equivalent frontline sales leader performs across core competencies — coaching, recruiting, pipeline discipline, accountability, and culture. Built for RevOps and sales leadership teams; the AI follow-up interview digs into the one lowest-rated competency to surface concrete behavior, not just a score.
View templateEmployee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection
A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, combining competency self-ratings, goal progress, and development priorities with an AI follow-up that draws out the specific evidence behind an employee's accomplishments and challenges. Built for HR teams and managers running annual or quarterly review processes.
View templateSenior Management Leadership Evaluation Survey
Gathers employee ratings of senior leadership on vision, decision-making, transparency, and accountability, plus behavioral data on how often leaders are visible day-to-day. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision or moment that most shaped each person's confidence — surfacing concrete evidence behind the scores for HR and the executive team.
View templateEmployee Performance Review & Development Check-In
A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, covering goal progress, core competencies, manager support, and development priorities — paired with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the story behind the ratings, not just the numbers, for richer 1:1 prep and calibration.
View templateEmployee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection Survey
A structured self-evaluation for performance review cycles, covering goal achievement, competency ratings, challenges, and development priorities. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific evidence behind the employee's self-rating instead of accepting vague self-praise or self-criticism at face value. Built for HR and people managers running review or check-in cycles.
View template