Q01
Message
All templatesDeveloper & Engineering
Incident Response Postmortem & Communication Effectiveness Survey
Collects structured feedback from incident responders and stakeholders to evaluate response execution, communication quality, and accountability of follow-up actions. Use after any significant incident to identify process improvements.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
22 questions · ~10 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
What was your primary role during this incident?
- Incident commander
- Technical responder
- Communications/PR
- Customer support
- Leadership/Executive
- Stakeholder or observer
Q03
Dropdown
Approximately how long did it take from detection to the start of a coordinated response?
- Under 5 minutes
- 5–15 minutes
- 16–30 minutes
- 31–60 minutes
- 1–2 hours
- More than 2 hours
- I don't know
Q04
Opinion Scale
How would you rate the timeliness of communications during the incident?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q05
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with the timeliness of the post-incident review?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all satisfiedMax:Extremely satisfied
Q06
Multiple Choice
Which single change would most improve incident communications next time?
- Clearer audience owners
- Preset update cadence
- Single source of truth
- Fewer channels
- More status detail
- More executive summaries
- Automated stakeholder lists
- Other (please specify)
Q07
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you'd like to share about this incident or our response process?
Q08
Multiple Choice
Which department or group are you part of?
- Engineering
- SRE/Operations
- Security
- Support
- Product/PM
- Communications/PR
- Leadership/Executive
- Other
Q09
Message
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback directly informs our incident response improvements and will be reviewed by the postmortem team.
Q10
Dropdown
Which area was primarily impacted by this incident?
- Customer-facing systems
- Internal tools
- Data/analytics
- Infrastructure/network
- Security
- Compliance/regulatory
- Other
Q11
Multiple Choice
Did the team follow a documented runbook during this incident?
- Yes, fully followed
- Partially followed
- No, deviated from runbook
- No runbook exists
Q12
Opinion Scale
How would you rate the clarity and accuracy of communications during the incident?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q13
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree that action items from this incident were clearly defined with accountable owners?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q14
AI Interview
We'd like to explore your experience a bit further. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions about the incident response and communication. Please respond in your own words.
Q15
Dropdown
How many years of experience do you have with incident response?
- Under 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- 11+ years
Q16
Long Text
If applicable, what is the name or ID of the incident you are referencing?
Q17
Opinion Scale
Overall, how effective were the corrective actions taken during this incident?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all effectiveMax:Extremely effective
Q18
Opinion Scale
How would you rate the frequency of stakeholder updates during this incident?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Far too infrequentMax:Far too frequent
Q19
Opinion Scale
How confident are you that the identified actions will prevent a similar incident within the next 6 months?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Very confident
Q20
Dropdown
Which region best describes your primary working time zone?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Other/Multiple
Q21
Long Text
What were the top blockers or obstacles to achieving a faster resolution?
Q22
Ranking
Rank the following communication channels from most to least effective during this incident.
- Slack/Chat
- Incident tool/Timeline
- Video bridge
- Status page
- Phone/SMS
Drag to rank
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Combines structured incident-execution questions (role, impacted area, detection-to-coordination timeline, runbook adherence) with dedicated ratings for communication timeliness, clarity, and update frequency
- Includes a ranking question comparing communication channel effectiveness and opinion-scale items on action-item clarity and confidence in preventing recurrence
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended answers about blockers and improvement ideas rather than leaving them as static free-text
- Closes with reflective open-text and segmentation questions (department, experience level, time zone) so QuestionPunk's auto-generated report can break down findings by stakeholder group
SurveyMonkey
Incident Report Form TemplateThis is a general-purpose incident report form for logging basic details of an event (what happened, when, who was involved) rather than a structured postmortem instrument. It's fielding-ready out of the box and benefits from SurveyMonkey's broader analytics and distribution tools, but it doesn't specifically address communication-quality assessment or follow-up accountability. Best suited as an initial incident intake form rather than a post-incident retrospective.
What it does well
- Fielding-ready template usable immediately without customization
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and reporting dashboards
- Customizable question set for basic incident logging
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended answers
- No structured multi-dimensional rating of communication timeliness, clarity, and frequency
- No published methodology or transparent prompt logic behind question design
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Incident Response Postmortem & Communication Effectiveness Survey” template?
The template includes 22 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the Incident Postmortem Survey. This survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes and asks about your experience…” · “What was your primary role during this incident?” · “Approximately how long did it take from detection to the start of a coordinated response?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 22 questions in about 10 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Developer & Engineering
Developer Productivity & AI Tooling Adoption Survey
Measures developer productivity, AI coding tool adoption and barriers, code quality practices, and professional growth for engineering teams. Designed for 6–8 minute completion with branching logic for AI tool users vs. non-users.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
Incident Communication & Stakeholder Update Survey
Evaluates the timeliness, clarity, channel effectiveness, and overall quality of incident communications from stakeholders' perspectives to identify actionable improvements in crisis response.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
Incident Communication Effectiveness Survey
Measures customer perceptions of clarity, timeliness, and trust in crisis and outage communications. Designed for B2B operations teams seeking to benchmark and improve incident response communication.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
Post-Incident Trust & Communication Assessment
Measures incident impact, communication effectiveness, and trust recovery across stakeholder roles. Designed for internal post-incident reviews to identify systemic improvement priorities.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
Incident Communication Effectiveness Assessment
Evaluates stakeholder perceptions of incident communication timeliness, clarity, frequency, and helpfulness to identify priority improvements in crisis communication workflows.
View templateDeveloper & Engineering
Crisis Response Evaluation and Debrief Survey
Gathers structured feedback from employees or stakeholders on how your organization communicated and led through a specific crisis — speed, clarity, and trust in decision-making — plus an AI follow-up that reconstructs the moment communication broke down or worked well. Built for comms, HR, and leadership teams running a post-incident debrief.
View template